Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Why France and not US?

.


After overextending itself in the Middle East for a decade, the United States is now resolved to avoid wars that never end.

As the world's most powerful nation relinquishes its role as global policeman, other countries will step in to stabilize crises that directly threaten their interests. France, for example, has taken the lead in Mali. With Europe enmeshed in a financial fiasco, Paris can't allow North African jihadists to threaten its energy investments and other assets in the region.

Which other nations will risk military overextension by protecting their interests, now that the U.S. will not do so on their behalf? Subscribe to Stratfor to understand the real implications of this shift in U.S. foreign policy.

Get beyond-the-headlines analysis of crises and major trends around the around. This week only, save 63% off a 1-year subscription and enjoy a trilogy of Stratfor global books to kick off your deep understanding of world affairs.

Subscribe now to access these reports & more.

International Intervention Strains
Mali's Jihadists
In Algeria, Militants Attack a
Vulnerable Target
The Arab Spring Matures
*This offer is only valid for new Stratfor subscribers. These prices cannot be applied to existing or renewal of Stratfor accounts. Memberships cannot be purchased to replace other higher priced memberships. Other exclusions or limitations may apply.
Questions? Contact feedback@stratfor.com or (512) 744-4300 ext 2


Stratfor
221 W. 6th Street, Suite 400
Austin, TX 78701, USA
www.Stratfor.com


No comments:

Post a Comment

Featured Post

RT @anti_commie32: Keep up the great work!!! https://t.co/FIAnl1hxwG

RT @anti_commie32: Keep up the great work!!! https://t.co/FIAnl1hxwG — Joseph Moran (@JMM7156) May 2, 2023 from Twitter https://twitter....