FUNNY: PROGRESSIVE SOCIALIST DEMOCRATS MERGING GLOBAL WARMING AND CIVIL RIGHTS: SELLING RACIAL VIOLATION OFFSETS?

One Citizen Speaking...

---

FUNNY: PROGRESSIVE SOCIALIST DEMOCRATS MERGING GLOBAL WARMING AND CIVIL RIGHTS: SELLING RACIAL VIOLATION OFFSETS? Posted: 30 Apr 2014 05:46 PM PDT I couldn’t stop laughing at this parody billboard that was inspired by the Los Angeles Chapter of the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) who was about to award racist asshole NBA Clippers owner Donald Sterling its major “lifetime achievement” award at a ceremony to be held just weeks after he was heard banning his girlfriend from bringing blacks to Clippers’ games. Just like polluters can continue polluting by purchasing government-sanctioned indulgences (aka carbon offset credits), perhaps racial transgressions can be monetized by non-profits seeking money to pay their overpaid executives … Stunning hypocrisy … Stunning, the apparent hypocrisy of non-profit organizations who take big bucks in return for bestowing credibility, awards, and support for miscreants who work the process. It appears only when they get caught up in a public brouhaha do they repent and decline to support the bad guy. Here the NAACP is honoring two blatant racists, one black and one white! What is even more stunning is that a poll finds black people, when it comes to whites and other minorities, are often among the most racist people in the land … More Americans View Blacks As Racist Than Whites, Hispanics Americans consider blacks more likely to be racist than whites and Hispanics in this country. Thirty-seven percent (37%) of American Adults think most black Americans are racist, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Just 15% consider most white Americans racist, while 18% say the same of most Hispanic Americans. (To see survey question wording, click here.) There is a huge ideological difference on this topic. Among conservative Americans, 49% consider most blacks racist, and only 12% see most whites that way. Among liberal voters, 27% see most white Americans as racist, and 21% say the same about black Americans. From a partisan perspective, 49% of Republicans see most black Americans as racist, along with 36% of unaffiliated adults and 29% of Democrats. Among black Americans, 31% think most blacks are racist, while 24% consider most whites racist and 15% view most Hispanics that way. Among white adults, 10% think most white Americans are racist; 38% believe most blacks are racist, and 17% say most Hispanics are racist. Source: Rasmussen Reports (2013) Bottom line … It would be poetic justice if militant blacks like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Spike Lee and others who have profited from the promotion of racism would have their private conversations taped and released to the public – and be denied the opportunity to pursue their commercial interests without being convicted of a crime. Such blatant hypocrisy from the progressive socialist democrats. Unbelievable. -- steve  Related articles RACIST CHARLIE RANGEL: Tea Party Is 'Same Group' Of 'White Crackers' Who Fought Civil Rights George Orwell Would Be So Proud of Today's Progressive Socialist Democrats Getting Real: Why Do Donald Sterling's Racist Comments Get Us More Outraged than Obama's Lies? Racist Clippers owner a Democrat scheduled to be honored by NAACP Let's kick racism out of sport ... forever! Why Would a Racist Vote Democrat? What Donald Sterling and Cliven Bundy can Teach Us about Racism in America Looking for an Excuse to Hate Hysteria Builds Over Donald Sterling's Racist Remarks

UCLA HYPOCRITES REJECT $3 MILLION GIFT FROM A RACIST, BUT ACCEPT MONEY FROM YAKUZA CRIME FAMILY HEAD Posted: 30 Apr 2014 03:18 PM PDT I was astounded that the oh so politically correct UCLA (University of California at Los Angeles) would reject a $3 million medical research gift from the disgraced NBA Clippers owner, Donald Sterling, based on nothing more than political correctness  …   UCLA rejects Donald Sterling gift Mr. Sterling’s divisive and hurtful comments demonstrate that he does not share UCLA’s core values as a public university that fosters diversity, inclusion and respect. For those reasons, UCLA has decided to return Mr. Sterling’s initial payment of $425,000 and reject the remainder of a $3 million pledge he recently made to support basic kidney research by the UCLA Division of Nephrology. UCLA has received numerous inquiries about an advertisement in Sunday’s Los Angeles Times falsely suggesting that it was UCLA publicly thanking him for the gift. The ad was placed by Mr. Sterling, not the university. <Source> This is not the first time wealthy miscreants have purchased favorable publicity to sway public opinion. In Sterling's case, just look at the black-eye given to the Los Angeles Chapter of the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) who was about to bestow a lifetime acheivement award on a person whose racist rant against black people -- as well as his previous court-adjudicated racist actions -- caused the present public outrage. Of course, the award was canceled ... but they refused to strip him of their previous awards. Money talks, bullshit walks. I strongly suggest that it wasn’t the tainted money that bothered the hypocrites at UCLA, but the public advertisement placed by Sterling’s people. It is not uncommon among big donors to dictate how the recipient must respond to a donation, specifying contractual obligations concerning naming rights to buildings, programs, scholarships, etc. and to specify the type and amount of publicity – including the granting of honorary degrees, titles, and awards. While UCLA has a problem taking research money from a man who has committed no crime, they do not seem to have problems taking money from real criminals and murderers …  After livers, cash to UCLA A powerful Japanese gang boss who received a liver transplant at UCLA Medical Center donated $100,000 to the Westwood hospital shortly after the surgery, The Times has learned. A plaque dated November 2001 at the entryway to a seventh-floor surgery office reads, "In grateful recognition of the Goto Research Fund established through the generosity of Mr. Tadamasa Goto." UCLA confirmed the amount of the donation Friday. Law enforcement sources say Goto, 65, is the leader of the ruthless Goto-gumi gang. He received a transplant at UCLA in July 2001, The Times reported Thursday. He made his donation less than three months later. UCLA also acknowledged that it received a separate $100,000 donation from another man who figured in Thursday's story. He donated in 2002, the year of his transplant. The man was identified by a law enforcement official as one of four Japanese men now barred from entering the United States because of their suspected gang affiliations, criminal records, or both. All four received new livers at UCLA between 2000 and 2004, <Source> Of course, this raised serious ethical questions of how foreign-born criminals may have managed to bypass the UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing) guidelines to disadvantage American citizens waiting desperately for a liver. Not to mention how criminals managed to enter the United States through a VISA program that should have flagged members of organized crime. I could not find any mention where UCLA returned the “tainted” donations or removed the plaque. Bottom line … If your organization is more worried about appearances and socialist political correctness, I guess it is unacceptable to take money from a self-aggrandizing racist asshole who has committed no crime, when contributions from real criminals are no problem. But, then again, I believe that entire University of California system has been tainted by appointing Janet Napolitano, who with no academic background and a history of managerial failure at the Department of Homeland Defense, as their President. In the final analysis, with progressive socialist democrats, it is more about the perception than the reality – even when the money could save innumerable lives should a cure be found for kidney disease. -- steve