Posted: 16 Jun 2016 11:47 PM PDT
Once again we are presented with the fact that Islam is unlikely to change for the single reason that, unlike the Bible, the Quran is the literal word of Allah as dictated to his Prophet Mohammad. And, therefore cannot be changed in any substantive manner without an accusation of apostasy or blasphemy; both capital crimes in the strictest interpretation of Islam. The fact that Mohammad was a power-mad warlord bent on conquest or that the Christian Crusades were actually a response to Muslim aggression does not seem to change President Obama’s opinions nor will it likely to change the moral equivalency that he often cites to justify Islamic terror.
Is there any refutation that this is incorrect?
While the Administration is banning the use of certain words or officially limiting instructional materials to be used to explain Islam to governmental agencies, someone must be aware of the clear and present danger presented by the Obama Administration and the Clinton Administration if Hillary Clinton be elected President. It appears that our politicians have had no compunction with lining their pockets with Muslim cash. Some payments, like those to the Clinton Global Initiative, being more blatant than others.
Bottom line …
The problem is not that Islam is not a true religion, but that it is a hybrid religion that merges church and state in such a fashion that there is zero tolerance for non-Muslims; and even for Muslims not in the mainstream. The choice: convert, live in servitude as subhuman slaves, or be put to the sword.
When will the civilized nations agree that there is evil on this earth and it comes dressed in the cloak of religion? Perhaps we do not need to bomb them into oblivion, but simply spray them with porcine blood and offering them an alternate salvation in the afterlife. Failing that, evil on Earth must be contained or destroyed.