Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Why Obama May Win in 2012?

      DR. WILLIAMS predicts that Obama can not  lose the 2012 election.    IN ADDITION TO THE VOTING BLOCKS HE MENTIONS, THERE IS ANOTHER HUGE  GROUP:  THE NEARLY ONE-HALF OF ALL ADULTS WHO DO NOT PAY ANY TAXES  AND, IN FACT, MOST OF THEM RECEIVE MONEY FROM THE GOVERNMENT. THESE  PEOPLE DO NOT WANT TO "SHAKE THE BOAT" TO DO ANYTHING TO STOP  THE FLOW OF TAXPAYER MONEY TO THEMSELVES.                          Dr. Williams  prediction:  Maybe you have read some newspaper articles  written by Dr. Williams a conservative economist who happens to be  Black. He has taught at several Universities and is currently  teaching at George Mason University .                     =                     No Matter  What    By Dr. Walter  Williams        Can President Obama be defeated in 2012?  No.  He can't. I am going on record as saying that  President Barak Obama will win a second term.    The media won't tell  you this because a good election campaign means hundreds of  millions (or in Obama's case billions) of dollars to them in  advertising.    But the truth is,  there simply are no conditions under which Barak Obama can be  defeated in 2012.     The quality of the Republican candidate doesn't matter.  Obama gets reelected.  Nine percent unemployment?   No problem.  Obama will win.  Gas  prices moving toward five  dollars a gallon?  He still wins.  The economy soars  or goes into the gutter.  Obama wins.  War in the Middle East ?  He wins a second term.    America's role as the  leading Superpower disappears?  Hurrah for Barak  Obama!  The US government rushes toward bankruptcy, the  dollar continues to sink on world markets and  the price of daily goods and services soars due to inflation  fueled by Obama's extraordinary deficit spending?  Obama wins handily.      You are  crazy Williams..  Don't you understand how volatile politics can be when overall economic, government, and world conditions are declining?  Sure I do.    And that's why I know  Obama will win.  The American people are notoriously  ignorant of economics..  And economics is the key to why Obama should be defeated.    Even when Obama's  policies lead the nation to final ruin, the majority of the  American people are going to believe the bait-and- switch  tactics Obama and his supporters in the media will use to explain why it isn't his fault.  After all, things were much worse than understood when he took office.    Obama's reelection is really a very, very simple math problem.           Consider the  following:    1) Blacks will vote  for Obama blindly.   Period.  Doesn't matter what he does.  It's a race thing.  He's one of us.            2) College educated women will vote for Obama.  Though they will be offended by this, they swoon at his oratory.  It's really not more complex than  that,         3)  Liberals will vote for Obama .  He is their great  hope,       4) Democrats will vote for Obama..  He is the leader of their  party and his coattails will carry them to victory nationwide,       5)  Hispanics will vote for Obama.   He is the path to  citizenship for those who are illegal and Hispanic leaders  recognize the political clout they carry in the Democratic  Party,       6) Union members will vote overwhelmingly for Obama .  He is their  key to money and power in business, state and local  politics,       7) Big Business will support Obama .  They already have.  He  has almost $1 Billion dollars in his reelection purse gained  largely from his connections with Big Business and  is gaining more everyday.  Big Business loves Obama  because he gives them access to taxpayer money so long as they  support his social and political  agenda,       8) The media love him.   They may attack the people  who work for  him, but they love him.  After all, to not love him would  be racist,       9) Most other minorities and special interest groups  will vote for  him. Oddly, the overwhelming majority of Jews and  Muslims will support him because they won't vote  Republican. American Indians will  support him.  Obviously homosexuals tend to vote  Democratic.  And lastly,    10) Approximately half  of independents will vote for Obama. And he doesn't need  anywhere near that number because he has all of the groups  previously mentioned.  The President will win an  overwhelming victory in 2012.     -- Dr.  Walter  Williams                    Obituary-Very Interesting!                         Born 1776, Died 2008     It doesn't hurt to read this several times.     Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline   University School of Law in St.. Paul , Minnesota , points out  some interesting facts concerning   the last    Presidential election:              Number of  States won by: Obama:19 McCain: 29       ·         Square miles  of land won by: Obama:580,000 McCain: 2,427,000     ·             ·         Population of counties won by: Obama:127 million McCain: 143 million     ·             ·         Murder rate  per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Obama: 13.2  McCain: 2.1   Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory McCain won  was mostly   the land owned  by the taxpaying citizens of the country. Obama territory mostly   encompassed those citizens living in   low income tenements and  living off various   forms of government  welfare..." Olson believes theUnited States is  now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of  Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty  percent of the nation's population already having reached the  "governmental dependency" phase.  If Congress  grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal  invaders called illegal's - and they vote - then we can say  goodbye to the USA in fewer  than five years.   If you are in favor of this, then by all means,  delete this message. If you are not,  then pass this along to help everyone realize just how much  is at stake,   knowing that   apathy is the greatest  danger to our freedom

Obama’s Genocidal Mediator

Obama’s Genocidal Mediator
Presidential Candidates Survey     Do you want to know who you are leaning towards as far as the presidential candidates? Take this interesting survey to verify your choice. It's very interesting. Have Fun!!   Here's the link for the survey:   http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/fullpage?id=15177995 No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4710 - Release Date: 12/29/11

Donald Trump On Obamacare

 No one can sum it up better than Trump   Let me get this straight . . We're going to be "gifted" with a health care plan we are forced to purchase and fined if we don't,  which purportedly covers at least ten million more people, without adding a single new doctor, but provides for 16,000 new IRS agents, written by a committee whose chairman says he doesn't understand it, passed by a Congress that didn't read it but exempted themselves from it, and signed by a President who smokes, with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes, for which we'll be taxed for four years before any benefits take effect, by a government which has already bankrupted Social Security and Medicare, all to be overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and financed by a country that is broke!!!!!   'What in the world could possibly go wrong?'  

The Year We Lost Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Turkey, Tunisia and Most of the Middle East

The Year We Lost Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Turkey, Tunisia and Most of the Middle East Posted by Daniel Greenfield Bio ↓ on Jan 3rd, 2012  Print This Post A A A About the only people having a Happy New Year in the Muslim world aren’t the Christians who are huddling and waiting out the storm, but the Islamists who use a different calendar, but are having the best time of their lives since the last Caliphate. The news that the Obama Administration has brought in genocidal Muslim Brotherhood honcho Yusuf Al-Qaradawi to discuss terms of surrender for the transfer of Afghanistan to the Taliban caps a year in which the Brotherhood and the Salafists are looking to carve up Egypt, the Islamists won Tunisia’s elections, Turkey’s Islamist AKP Party purged the last bastions of the secular opposition and Libya’s future as an Islamist state was secured by American, British and French jets and special forces. Time Magazine declared that 2011 was the Year of the Protester, they might have more honestly called it the Year of the Islamist. In 2010 the Taliban were still hiding in caves. In 2012 they are set to be in power from Tunisia to Afghanistan and from Egypt to Yemen. They won’t go by that name of course. Most of them will have elaborate names with the words “Justice” or “Community” in them, but they will for the most part be minor variations on the Muslim Brotherhood theme. 2011 will indeed be remembered, but not because of any Arab Spring or OWS nonsense. It will be a pivotal year in the rise of the next Caliphate. A rise disguised by angry protesters waving cell phones and flags. And clueless media coverage that treated Tahrir Square as the new fall of the Berlin Wall. This was the year that Obama helped topple several regimes that served as the obstacles to Islamist takeovers. The biggest fish that Ibn Hussein speared out of the sea for Al-Qaradawi was Egypt, a prize that the Islamists had wanted for the longest time, but had never managed to catch. That is until the Caliph-in-Chief got it for them. Egyptian Democracy splits the take between the Brotherhood and the Salafists, whom the media is already quick to describe as moderates. First up against the wall are the Christians. Second up against the wall are the Jews. Third up is all that military equipment we provided to the Egyptian military which will shortly be finding its way to various “moderate militants” who want to discuss our foreign policy with us. But there’s no reason to sell the fall of Tunisia short or the transition in Yemen. And when mob protests didn’t work, NATO sent in the jets to pound Libya until Al-Qaeda got its way there. Turkey’s fate had been written some time ago, but 2011 was the year that the AKP completed its death grip on the country with a final crackdown on the military, which has now ceased to be a force for stability. Left out of the picture is Somalia. Liberals fulminated when Bush helped drive out Al-Shaab and its jolly Muslim lads with a habit of beheading people who didn’t grow beards or watched too much soccer. Any number of editorials complained that we had destabilized the country and that the Islamic Courts Union were really a bunch of moderates in disguise. Sadly Obama has not been able to salvage the position of Al-Shabab which is low on money and has turned to forcing 12 year old girls into prostitution and torturing and murdering those who refuse. They’re also forcing the elderly to join its militias. But there is good news. Like every terrorist group, Al-Shabab has gotten itself a Twitter account and when O finds 5 minutes in between vacations and golf tournaments, the White House will order neighboring African countries to withdraw their armies and send in Al-Qaradawi to negotiate. But even if the Islamists don’t get Somalia, they’ve got a nice chunk of North Africa to chew over, not to mention a few more slices of the Middle-Eastern pie, and Afghanistan will be back in their hands as soon as they manage to outmaneuver Karzai, which given his paranoia and cunning may admittedly take a while. But the Taliban are not big on maneuvers, they have the manpower, which means it’s only a matter of time until they do what the Mujaheddin did to the puppet Soviet regime. A history that everyone in the region is quite familiar with. The ugliest part of this story isn’t what Obama did. It’s when he did it. If he really had no interest in winning Afghanistan, and if as he had said, the Taliban are not our enemy, then why did we stay for so long and lose so many lives fighting a war that the White House had no intention of winning? The ugly conclusion that must be drawn from the timing of the Iraq and Afghanistan withdrawals is that the wars were being played out to draw down around the time of the next election. Continue reading page: 1 2 About Daniel Greenfield Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century. Do you like this story? Tags: Afghanistan, afghanistan photos, egypt, islamist, muslim brotherhood, Tunisia Related Posts Egypt’s Mubarak promises to crush jihad groups Lessons on the Long Road to Hijab The Specter of Jizya Returns to Egypt The Dangers of Democracy Egypt’s Defining Period Begins

Featured Post

RT @anti_commie32: Keep up the great work!!! https://t.co/FIAnl1hxwG

RT @anti_commie32: Keep up the great work!!! https://t.co/FIAnl1hxwG — Joseph Moran (@JMM7156) May 2, 2023 from Twitter https://twitter....