Monday, October 3, 2011

CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATS AND IDENTITY THEFT ...


One Citizen Speaking:  October 03, 2011

Shock Photos: BARACK OBAMA Marched With New Black Panthers at 2007 Selma Rally


 
 
Shock Photos!
New Panther National Chief Malik Zulu Shabazz is seen speaking at the rally on the left. Then Obama speaks to the Selma crowd at the same rally.
Barack Obama marched with New Black Panthers at a rally in 2007.
Andrew Breitbart at Big Government reported:
New photographs obtained exclusively by BigGovernment.com reveal that Barack Obama appeared and marched with members of the New Black Panther Party as he campaigned for president in Selma, Alabama in March 2007.
The photographs, captured from a Flickr photo-sharing account before it was scrubbed, are the latest evidence of the mainstream media’s failure to examine Obama’s extremist ties and radical roots.
In addition, the new images raise questions about the possible motives of the Obama administration in its infamous decision to drop the prosecution of the Panthers for voter intimidation.
The images, presented below, also renew doubts about the transparency of the White House’s guest logs–in particular, whether Panther National Chief Malik Zulu Shabazz is the same “Malik Shabazz” listed among the Obama administration’s early visitors.
Tomorrow, J. Christian Adams, the Department of Justice whistleblower in the New Black Panther Party case, will release his new book, Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department (Regnery).
The book exposes Obama administration corruption far beyond the Panther dismissal, and reveals how the institutional Left has turned the power of the DOJ into an ideological weapon.
Adams’s book also describes, in detail, the Selma march at which then-Senator Obama was joined by a group of Panthers who had come to support his candidacy.
Among those appearing with Obama was Shabazz, the Panther leader who was one of the defendants in the voter intimidation case that Attorney General Eric Holder dismissed. Also present was the Panthers’ “Minister of War,” Najee Muhammed, who had called for murdering Dekalb County, Georgia, police officers with AK-47’s and then mocking their widows in this video (7:20 – 8:29).
This was the same visit to Selma where Obama credited the 1965 marchers with empowering his black father and white mother to marry… Obama was born in 1961. He was off by 4 years. But, it made a good speech.
Here is his political speech inside the church.


1% tax on all bank transactions HR4646 Watch for this

Direct Deposit and All other Bank Account Transactions Many people have social security pensions and other sources of income directly deposited to their bank accounts as well as recurring payments such as utility bills, credit cards, and the like directly charged to their accounts. Starting January 1, 2012, the Obama ' redistribute the wealth' administration will have these transactions automatically 'taxed' 1%, deducted from your bank account and sent directly to the U. S. Treasury. See below. ON JANUARY 1 ST 2012, THE GOVERNMENT IS REQUIRING EVERYONE TO HAVE DIRECT DEPOSIT FOR SS CHECKS. WONDER WHY? 1% tax on all bank transactions HR4646 Watch for this AFTER November elections; remember this BEFORE you VOTE in case you think Obama's looking out for your best interest. 1% tax on all bank transactions HR 4646 This government just cannot think of enough ways to hurt the American people! I sure hope this dies!!!!! FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW! 1% tax on all bank transactions HR 4646 - ANOTHER NEW OBAMA TAX SLIPPED IN WHILE WE WERE ASLEEP. Checked this on snopes, it's true! Check out HR 4646. President Obama's finance team is recommending a one percent (1%) transaction fee (TAX). Obama's plan is to sneak it in after the November elections to keep it under the radar. This is a 1% tax on all transactionsat any financial institution - banks, credit unions, savings and loans, etc. Any deposit you make, or even a transfer within your account, will have a 1% tax charged. ~If your paycheck or your social security or whatever is direct deposit, it will get a 1% tax charged for the transaction. ~If your paycheck is $1000, then you will pay Obama $10 just for the privilege of depositing your paycheck in your bank. Even if you hand carry your paycheck or any check into your bank for a deposit, 1% tax will be charged. ~You receive a $5,000 stock dividend from your broker, Obama takes $50 just to allow you to deposit that check in the bank.. ~If you take $1,000 cash to deposit at your bank, 1% tax will be charged. Mind you, this is from the man who promised that, if you make under $250,000 per year, you will not see one penny of new tax. Keep your eyes and ears open, you will be amazed at what you learn about this guy's under-the-table moves to increase the number of ways you are taxed. Oh, and by the way, if you receive a tax payment refund from the IRS next year and you have it direct deposited or you walk in to deposit that check, you guessed it. You will pay a 1% charge of that money just for putting it in your bank. Remember, any money, cash, check or whatever, no matter where it came from, you will pay a 1% fee if you put it in the bank. Some will say, oh well, it's just 1%. Are you kidding me? It's a 1% tax increase across the board. Remember, once the tax is there, they can also raise it at will. And if anyone protests, they will just say, "Oh,that's not really a tax, it's a user fee"! Think this is no big deal? Go back and look at the transactions you made on one year's banking statements. Then add the total of all those transactions and deduct 1%. Still think it's no big deal? " A government big enough to give you everything you want is also big enough to take away everything you have." - Barry Goldwater here is a copy from Snopes: Diane 1. <http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/debtfree.asp>; snopes.com: Debt Free America Act Is the U.S. government proposing a 1% tax on debit card usage and/or banking transactions? ...It is true. The bill is HR-4646 introduced by US Rep Peter deFazio D-Oregon and US Senator Tom Harkin D-Iowa. Their plan is to sneak it in after the... ...would be a minimal tax on the people, but 1 percent every time you pay a bill or make a deposit is not minimal. This would no doubt tax investment... ...which they introduce legislation in Congress after Congress, although their bills never come close to passing, or even clear committee to be put to votes... Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:26:25 GMT http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/debtfree.

2012 is near: You may have seen some version of this, but it can’t be repeated too often.


You may have seen some version of this, but it can’t be repeated too often.


SOME OF YOU WILL APPRECIATE THIS
AND SOME OF YOU WILL NOT.

I DO NOT APOLOGIZE FOR SENDING THIS
BECAUSE ALL OF IT IS TRUE.


If any other of our presidents
Had doubled the National Debt, which
Had taken more than two centuries
To accumulate, in one year,
Would You have Approved?

If any other of our presidents
Had then proposed to Double
The debt again within 10 years,
Would you have approved?

If any other of our presidents
Had criticized a State Law that
He admitted he never even read,
Would you think that he is
Just an ignorant hot Head?

If any other of our presidents
Joined the country of Mexico and sued a
State in the United States to force that State
To continue to allow Illegal Immigration,
Would you question his patriotism
And wonder who's side he was on?

If any other of our presidents
Had pronounced the Marine Corps
As if it were the Marine Corpse,
Would you think him an Idiot?

If any other of our presidents
Had put 87,000 workers out of work
By arbitrarily placing a moratorium on
Offshore oil drilling on companies that have
One of the best safety records of any industry
Because one foreign company had an accident,
Would you have agreed?

If any other of our presidents
Had used a forged document as the
Basis of the moratorium that would render
87000 American workers unemployed,
Would you support him?

If any other of our presidents
Had been the first President to need a
Teleprompter installed to be able to get through
A press conference, would you have laughed and said
This is more proof of how inept he is on his own and is
Really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes?

If any other of our presidents
Had spent hundreds of thousands of Dollars
To take his First Lady to a play in NYC,
Would you have approved?

If any other of our presidents
Had reduced your retirement plan holdings
Of GM stock by 90% and given the
Unions a majority stake in GM,
Would you have approved?

If any other of our presidents
Had made a joke at the expense
Of the Special Olympics,
Would you have approved?

If any other of our presidents
Had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive
And incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown
Had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift,
Would you have approved?

If any other of our presidents
Had given the Queen of England an
IPod containing videos of his speeches,
Would you have thought it to be a
Proud moment for America ?

If any other of our presidents
Had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia ,
Would you have approved?

If any other of our presidents
Had visited Austria and made reference
To the nonexistent "Austrian language,"
Would you have brushed it off
As a minor slip?

If any other of our presidents
Had filled his Cabinet and circle of
Advisers with people who cannot seem
To keep current on their Income Taxes,
Would you have approved?

If any other of our presidents
Had stated that there were 57 states in
The United States , wouldn't you have had
Second thoughts about his capabilities?

If any other of our presidents
Would have flown all the way to Denmark
To make a five minute speech about how the Olympics
Would benefit him walking out his front door in his
Home town, would you not have thought he was
A self-important, conceited, egotistical jerk?

If any other of our presidents
had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to
"Cinco de Cuatro" in front of the Mexican ambassador
when it was "The 5th of May" (Cinco de Mayo),
and then continue to flub it when he tried again,
wouldn't you have winced in embarrassment?

If any other of our presidents
had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel
to go plant a single tree on Earth Day,
would you have concluded he's a Hypocrite?

If any other of our presidents'
Administrations had okayed Air Force One
flying low over millions of people followed by
a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing
widespread panic, would you have wondered
whether they actually get what happened on 9-11?

If any other of our presidents
had failed to send relief aid to flood victims
throughout the Midwest, with more people killed
or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you
want it made into a major ongoing Political issue
with claims of racism and incompetence?

If any other of our presidents
had created the positions of 32 Czars
who report directly to him, bypassing
the House and Senate on much of
what is happening in America ,
would you have approved?

If any other of our presidents
had ordered the firing of the CEO
of a major corporation, even though he
had no constitutional authority to do so,
would you have approved?


So, tell me again,
what is it about Obama that
makes him so brilliant and impressive?

Can't think of anything?
Then you'd better start worrying.
He's done all these things in 28 months --
and you have less than 19 months
to come up with an answer.

Every statement and action in this email
is factual and correctly attributable
to Barrack Hussein Obama.
Every bumble is a matter of record
and completely verifiable.


I WONDER ......
HOW MANY OF YOU
WILL FORWARD THIS?
"All it takes for evil to triumph
is for good men to do nothing."

'Catching Pigs' read and remember! 2012!


CATCHING PIGS

There was a chemistry professor in a large college

that had some exchange students in the class. One day

while the class was in the lab, the Prof noticed one

young man, an exchange student, who kept rubbing his

back and stretching as if his back hurt.


The professor asked the young man what was the matter.

The student told him he had a bullet lodged in his back.
He had been shot while fighting communists in his native country who were trying to overthrow his country's government and install a new communist regime.

In the midst of his story, he looked at the professor

and asked a strange question He asked:

"Do you know how to catch wild pigs?"

The professor thought it was a joke and asked for the

punch line. The young man said that it was no joke.

"You catch wild pigs by finding a suitable place in

the woods and putting corn on the ground. The pigs

find it and begin to come everyday to eat the free

corn. When they are used to coming every day, you put
a fence down one side of the place where they are used
to coming.

When they get used to the fence, they begin to eat the

corn again and you put up another side of the fence.

They get used to that and start to eat again. You

continue until you have all four sides of the fence up

with a gate in the last side.

The pigs, which are used to the free corn, start to

come through the gate to eat that free corn again.

You then slam the gate on them and catch the whole

herd. Suddenly the wild pigs have lost their freedom.

They run around and around inside the fence, but they

are caught.

Soon they go back to eating the free corn . They are so used
to it that they have forgotten how to forage in the

woods for themselves, so they accept their captivity."

The young man then told the professor that is exactly

what he sees happening in America .. The government

keeps pushing us toward Communism/Socialism and keeps

spreading the free corn out in the form of programs

such as supplemental income, tax credit for unearned

income, , tax exemptions, tobacco subsidies,

dairy subsidies, payments not to plant crops (CRP),

welfare, medicine, drugs, etc. while we continually

lose our freedoms, just a little at a time.

One should always remember two truths:
1) There is no such thing as a free lunch, someone is
paying for it
2) and when you begin to think that having your government
provide for you and make your decisions is ok, realize that you’ve

also given up the freedom that goes with making your own choices.

If you see that all of this wonderful government

'help' is a problem confronting the future of

democracy in America, you might want to send this on

to your friends.

If you think the “free ride” is essential to your way of

life, then you will probably delete this email.

But God help you when the gate slams shut

Rasmussen Rpts: Daily Update


Logo 
Daily Update

Americans believe more strongly than ever that China is a long-term threat to the United States, and they overwhelmingly feel that threat is economic rather than military.

More Reasons to Go Platinum! 


Platinum Service members can now receive e-mail alerts the moment new poll results are available.  And with more detailed articles, demographic breakdowns, and insight and analysis from Scott Rasmussen, you have even more reasons to go Platinum.  If you're not already a member, sign up today!   
Forward to a Friend
Self-Governance Box Ad 
Pulse Opinion Research Banner Ad 

From their beginning in 2008, the bailouts for Wall Street and the auto industry have been among the most unpopular government actions in recent American history. New polling shows that even after three years, the attitudes haven't changed all that much.   

  
Most voters still favor repeal of the national health care law, but support for repeal is at its lowest level since May. Most also continue to expect the law to drive up health care costs and the federal deficit.
 



In case you missed yesterday's edition of The Rasmussen Reportlisten here.  

Scott Rasmussen's book, Mad As Hell: How the Tea Party Movement Is Fundamentally Remaking Our Two-Party System, is now available in paperback
  
Coming Soon:
(Times below reflect public site release. Platinum Servicemembers can log in earlier or sign up for e-mail alerts for an advanced look at the poll results.)

Noon Eastern:  Election 2012:  Perry v. Obama

1 p.m. Eastern:  Obama Month-to-Month Update

3 p.m. Eastern:  Generic Congressional Ballot Update 
  

Majority of IEDs are traced to Pakistan


Majority of IEDs are traced to Pakistan



WASHINGTON – Pakistan is the source of explosives in the vast majority of makeshift bombs insurgents in Afghanistan planted this summer to attack U.S. troops, according to U.S. military commanders.
  • The U.S. military is working to beef up security against IEDs.
    By Johannes Eisele, AFP/Getty Images
    The U.S. military is working to beef up security against IEDs.

By Johannes Eisele, AFP/Getty Images

The U.S. military is working to beef up security against IEDs.

From June through August, U.S. troops detected or were hit by 5,088 improvised explosive devices (IEDs), the most for any three-month period since the war began in 2001.
Those bombs killed 63 troops and wounded 1,234,Defense Department records show.
More than 80% of the IEDs are homemade explosives using calcium ammonium nitrate fertilizer produced in Pakistan, said Navy Capt. Douglas Borrebach, deputy director for resources and requirements at the Pentagon's Joint IED Defeat Organization.
"The border is a sieve," Borrebach said. "You can do your checkpoints, but that's not going to help stem the supply."
The military is working with the State Department, other U.S. agencies and Pakistan's government to prevent fertilizer from reaching the insurgents' bomb factories.

Bomb casualties

U.S. troop casualties from improvised explosive devices in Afghanistan*:

* June through August; Source: U.S. Defense Department

The U.S. government increasingly has been blaming Pakistan for failing to corral insurgents. Two weeks ago, Adm. Michael Mullen, then the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the Haqqani terror network linked to attacks in Afghanistan had ties to Pakistan's spy agency.
A Senate bill includes funds to train border guards and customs officials in Pakistan and Afghanistan. It also supports agricultural extension programs that encourage Pakistani farmers to use alternative fertilizers.
Sen. Robert Casey, D-Pa., met with top civilian and military leaders in Pakistan in August to urge them to stop the flow of bomb-making materials into Afghanistan. They promised to help, but did not reveal a sense of urgency, Casey told USA TODAY after the trip.
Choking off the source of fertilizer is critical, Borrebach said. "How do we work with Pakistan to be able to reduce the amount of calcium ammonium nitrate coming across the border?" he said. "That's the key to this."
Not necessarily, said Seth Jones, an expert on Afghanistan at the RAND Corp. who has advised the special operations forces there. "You could bang your head against a wall for eternity trying to keep ammonium nitrate from crossing the border," Jones said.
The Taliban and other insurgent groups operate out of a border region between Pakistan and Afghanistan, over which the Pakistani government has little control.
Beefing up local security forces in Afghanistan, he said, shows more promise in defeating the IED problem. He pointed to areas of Kandahar province where homegrown security forces, assisted by the U.S. troops, had made life better for local citizens. They, in turn, rejected insurgents, sided with the security forces and pointed out bomb caches. The IED problems subsided, he said.

By Tom Vanden Brook, USA TODAY



Featured Post

RT @anti_commie32: Keep up the great work!!! https://t.co/FIAnl1hxwG

RT @anti_commie32: Keep up the great work!!! https://t.co/FIAnl1hxwG — Joseph Moran (@JMM7156) May 2, 2023 from Twitter https://twitter....