Sunday, October 9, 2011

Steve Jobs and the Adullamites Who Occupy Wall Street


Steve Jobs and the Adullamites Who Occupy Wall Street

By Clarice Feldman
The president and his attorney general, along with a number of other high-ranking administration officials, found themselves in deep trouble this week as their scandalous conduct in Solyndra and Fast and Furious received increased congressional scrutiny and some media attention.  To distract voters from the real cause of their unhappiness, the friends and supporters of the almost-hero of Altgeld Gardens (Obama, the community organizer who almost got the asbestos out of that Chicago slum property but never succeeded) have organized largely astroturf occupations of Wall Street, D.C., and elsewhere which demonize the very forces which could and do improve our lives.
My friend who posts under the pen name "Danube of Thought" calls the people occupying Wall Street and elsewhere Adullamites, after the Biblical description (Samuel 22:1-2) of those who gathered around David when he escaped Saul and went to the cave of Adullam: "everyone who was in distress, everyone who was in debt, and everyone who was discontented."  It seems a perfect fit for these mobs.
Unlike Altgeld Gardens, where there was a defined target -- asbestos removal -- the goal of these folks (besides getting others to give them the wherewithal, like blankets and food, to carry on) is unclear.
It seems to me that today's Adullamites' message is at bottom:
When do we want it?
Now!
What do we want?
???????
On what might -- were this not billed as a totally unstructured movement -- be deemed Occupy Wall Street's "official website," one poster listed these demands:
Demand one: Restoration of the living wage. This demand can only be met by ending "Freetrade" by re-imposing trade tariffs on all imported goods entering the American market to level the playing field for domestic family farming and domestic manufacturing as most nations that are dumping cheap products onto the American market have radical wage and environmental regulation advantages. Another policy that must be instituted is raise the minimum wage to twenty dollars an hr.
Demand two: Institute a universal single payer healthcare system. To do this all private insurers must be banned from the healthcare market as their only effect on the health of patients is to take money away from doctors, nurses and hospitals preventing them from doing their jobs and hand that money to wall st. investors.
Demand three: Guaranteed living wage income regardless of employment.
Demand four: Free college education.
Demand five: Begin a fast track process to bring the fossil fuel economy to an end while at the same bringing the alternative energy economy up to energy demand.
Demand six: One trillion dollars in infrastructure (Water, Sewer, Rail, Roads and Bridges and Electrical Grid) spending now.
Demand seven: One trillion dollars in ecological restoration planting forests, reestablishing wetlands and the natural flow of river systems and decommissioning of all of America's nuclear power plants.
Demand eight: Racial and gender equal rights amendment.
Demand nine: Open borders migration. anyone can travel anywhere to work and live.
Demand ten: Bring American elections up to international standards of a paper ballot precinct counted and recounted in front of an independent and party observers system.
Demand eleven: Immediate across the board debt forgiveness for all. Debt forgiveness of sovereign debt, commercial loans, home mortgages, home equity loans, credit card debt, student loans andpersonal loans now! All debt must be stricken from the "Books." World Bank Loans to all Nations, Bank to Bank Debt and all Bonds and Margin Call Debt in the stock market including all Derivatives or Credit Default Swaps, all 65 trillion dollars of them must also be stricken from the "Books." And I don't mean debt that is in default, I mean all debt on the entire planet period.
Demand twelve: Outlaw all credit reporting agencies.
Demand thirteen: Allow all workers to sign a ballot at any time during a union organizing campaign or at any time that represents their yeah or nay to having a union represent them in collective bargaining or to form a union.
These demands will create so many jobs it will be completely impossible to fill them without an open borders policy.
The administrators of the website, however, indicate that this was not a position adopted by "consensus"; it represents only one supporter's view.  But there is hardly more clarity elsewhere, and this utterly childish list seems to accurately convey the varied naïve and unworkable demands by a powerless group of dopes and dupes.
In D.C., the turnout was paltry.  The legitimate ranks the event turned out were even thinner than they appeared.  The marchers included Hispanics who were paid to carry signs whose meaning they didn't understand.
In Los Angeles, the crowd was also thin and astroturfed byvarious labor unions:
"The marchers also included scores of people bused in by various labor unions, which led observer Andrew Breitbart to smell conspiracy. The conservative blogger was videotaping the march and argued that the union involvement meant the demonstration had been 'astroturfed' -- that is, manufactured to give the false appearance that it was a public groundswell." Well, when even sympathetic media accounts can only report "hundreds" of protesters it's not a very successful false appearance.
But it is clear that whatever these people think they are doing, Nancy Pelosi applauds them and blesses them "for their spontaneity.  It's independent ... it's young, it's spontaneous, and it's focused.  And it's going to be effective."  Like maggots drawn to rotting meat, she's joined by other rich lefties eggingthe demonstrators on.
Hip hop and credit card mogul Russell Simmons (net worth: $340 million), alleged comedian Roseanne Barr (net worth: $80 million), actress Susan Sarandon (net worth: $50 million), and celluloid propagandist Michael Moore (net worth: $50 million) have all dropped by to cheer on the protesters in their quest to redistribute wealth while radically transforming the nation.
Simmons stood beside Frances Fox Piven as the Bolshevik academic unwittingly created an impromptu parody of the "we're all individuals" crowd scene in Monty Python's Life of Brian. "Wall Street is the center of the neo-liberal cancer that has spread across the world," Piven said, pausing every few seconds to allow the mob to repeat her words.
After Piven finished, Simmons stood up and did the same routine like an automaton from a creepy cult. As the mob repeated his words, Simmons condemned the "class warfare being waged on the poor and the middle class" and claimed:
The fact is our problem, at least our number one problem, is the corporations and the other special interest groups that are more important to our politicians than the people. The lobbyists and the money gotta get the f*** out of Washington.
But as Professor Bainbridge and our own Rick Moran note, the claim that the corporations run the government is ridiculous on its face.
This "corporations run the government" meme has been around since the 1970s, and it's no more true now than it was then. As Rick Moran points out, if corporations really ran the government would we have an EPA, OSHA, SEC, the EEOC, the FHA, the Department of Labor, or any of the other number of state and federal agencies regulate corporate behavior? If corporations truly "ran" the government, then why would any of these organizations exist?
Corporations do influence the government, of course. But then so do labor unions, the legal profession, the medical profession, special interest groups based on one form of racial or ethnic grievance or another, and lobbying interests ranging from Iowa corn to Texas oil. The problem isn't corporations, the problem is that we have a government that has its fingers in nearly every aspect of the economy. That means that policy makers have the ability to pick economic winners and losers every day, and it's only natural that those policies would be of concern to the people that they're going to impact most directly, the businesses affected by them. That's lobbying and petitioning the government for redress of grievances, not "running the government." This kind of reflexive anti-business mentality seems to be quite common in some sectors of society, but it has little basis in reality and seems firmly entrenched in resentment and envy rather than an honest examination of the country's political system.
In any event, those who are supporting the Occupiers and marching with them include many who are the very beneficiaries of Obama's stimulus legislation, which bailed out them and their employers.
"Several major labor groups--including the Transport Workers Union, the Service Employees International Union, the United Federation of Teachers and the United Auto Workers--took part in the march," the Times adds, although "some more traditionally conservative ones, like those in the construction trades, stayed away."
One common characteristic of the four unions the Times cites is that they all include members who work for the government or, in the case of the UAW, for corporate welfare cases. As Michael Barone noted in a February 2010 column: "One-third of [2009's] $787 billion stimulus package was aid to state and local governments--an obvious attempt to bolster public-sector unions."
In the interest of truth in advertising, the unions ought to print up signs that read "Project funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act." And now of course President Obama is demanding yet another stimulus, which would subsidize these protests further.
Thus far Occupiers have been carrying around largely hand-lettered signs saying things like "I could lose my job 4 having a voice" or "Bank's got bailed-out We got sold out!!!" to quote verbatim a couple of examples from a recent slide show from London's Daily Mail.
I think it clear that the Occupiers cannot refine or focus their demands.  If they do pick discrete objectives, it will alienate significant portions of their already limited number of supporters.  The mob is not particularly cohesive.  They have a wide range of inconsistent desires.  I doubt that without a goal there can be a victory, just as I doubt that hiring organizers to mobilize tenants instead of engaging asbestos removal teams was the way to go at Altgeld Gardens.  These folks need engineers, entrepreneurs, and people willing to invest again, not rabble-rousers, if they wish to recharge our economy, which has been battered by Obama-generated uncertainty and regulatory overreach.
The untimely death of Steve Jobs last week underscored the vast difference between organizing malcontents and improving the world.  Online, the picture of the occupation that most emphasized the incongruity of it all to me was an anti-corporation protester being taped on an Apple iPad.  And surely, the tweets and texting and e-mailing and reporting on the demonstrations involved the use of millions of Jobs-created Apple products.
Heritage's Edwin Feulner described the divide between the occupiers and Jobs better than I can:
Jobs and innovators like him epitomize that immeasurable quality the left somehow finds most abject -- American exceptionalism.
The meme of the left is that drudgery and mediocrity is not just our future but probably also our just deserts-for being too imperialistic, consumerist, wasteful, patriarchal, or what have you. (For an inexhaustible list of all our ills and sins, please check with the mob gathered at the "Occupy Wall Street" protest.) One should compare this deadened vision with the wonders Jobs wrought.
Apple Computer, the company Jobs founded at the age of 21 along with his friend Steve Wozniak, was valued at the close of business yesterday at $350 billion and some change, more than $100 billion ahead of Microsoft. General Electric, another American giant, weighed in at less than half the price, $161 billion. Ford, GM and Volkswagen? Respectively, $40 billion, $35 billion and $42 billion. That should give some idea of where we are in the 21st century.
That beauty contest, how much a company is worth, is a result of decisions made by millions of investors voting with people's savings (that is, for most of us, the sweat of our brow and our hedge against an uncertain future). Investors voted for Jobs' company because consumers loved its products, and consumers bought Apple products not because they were ordered to do so by central planners but because they saw them as magic.
From computing to music to journalism, Jobs changed the way the world did its business and leisure. ...
All this was the result of the happy coincidence of genius in an individual and a system. Jobs was an individual with special DNA, no question. But this half-Arab boy who was given up for adoption at birth and went on to drop out of college was able to transform the lives of individuals across the world because he lived and worked in this country.
The genius of the American system is comprised of the rule of law, respect for private property and the freedom of the individual to strive to be better than himself and his neighbor and reap the rewards that come from his innate abilities and effort. All of these and many other liberties are safeguarded in our Constitution. It is all part of what makes us an exceptional country.
Already have an account with American Thinker? Login below.
 | 

COMMENTS ON AMERICANTHINKER

Showing 21 comments

  • StokeyBob Today 02:34 AM
    The root that drives these protest is fiat currency. Maybe this will help you understand why no matter how much money you and your friends can get together to build your world the way you want, others can fire up the fake money presses and print what ever it takes to get their way.

    Imagine you and I are setting across from each other. We create enough money to represent all of the world's wealth. Each one of us has one SUPER DOLLAR in front of him. You own half of everything and so do I. I'm the government though. I get bribed into creating a central bank. Your not doing what I want you to be doing so I print up myself eight more SUPER DOLLARS to manipulate you with. All of a sudden your SUPPER DOLLAR only represents one tenth of the wealth of the world!

    That isn't the only thing though. You need to get busy and get to work because you've been stiffed with the bill for the money I printed up to get you to do what I wanted.That to me represents what has happened to our economy, and us, and why so many of...
     show more
  • Galen Hoover Today 05:24 AM
    As Rick Moran points out, if corporations really ran the government would we have an
    EPA, OSHA, SEC, the EEOC, the FHA, the Department of Labor, or any of the other number of state and federal agencies regulate corporate behavior?


    Let me give you one small example of the naivete of this statement. In order to purchase the cold medicine pseudoephedrine, you now must go to the pharmacy counter and be identified. Before, it was on the shelf as brand name "Sudafed" with cheaper generics stocked next to it. There was fierce competition when the product was on the shelf accessible to all. Now, competition has been crushed. The pharmacy has limited shelf space and many times little time to spend with EACH customer explaining the differences in price of brand and generic. The result? Only brand name is stocked. The maker of "Sudafed" now controls nearly the entire market. Competition is flushed down the commode.

    Government regulations through the myriad departments listed in the quote favors the well establish corporation. New entries face significant, expensive regulatory hurdles to start competing. Automobile manufacturing is a perfect example. What would it cost for an upstart to start making standard...
     show more
  • PatrickofAtlantis Today 06:08 AM
    I was talking to a Wiccan last night and referenced the Books of Samuel on the witch of Endor, so it is fresh on my mind. David was fleeing from Saul, not Solomon, when he went to the cave at Adullam. Solomon wasn't born yet.
  • George S Today 06:26 AM
    Apple is worth 350 billion? Next year the federal government will spend that amount in one month. And yet we can't fix bridges and fill potholes. But the protestors see right through the deception -- corporations are not making enough money. That's why they're evil.
  • HicksvilleKid Today 07:02 AM
    Another example of naivete is the situation with Sudafed. The reason that Sudafed (as well as other brands containing pseudoephedrine hydrochloride) is that it is used by methamphetamine addicts to make methamphetamine. The government wants to control it so that meth addicts don't buy up all the 'generics' and Sudafed to make their brew. I've been taking it for more years than I can remember and the generic works just as well as the brandname. You must sign for it at the counter and the database lets the state know when the same name shows up. If it shows up too many times you can expect to be rejected for the sale. I've never been rejected (it takes months to go through a box) and I always get the generic. And, by the way....the crap out on the shelves without the pseudophedrine hydrochloride doesn't work. Don't be fooled. Just my two cents.
  • Bear1909 Today 08:01 AM
    The government is a corporation.  The President is its CEO.  The Board is Congress.  It's enterprise units are the cabinet level departments which spend the capital provided by units of production- taxpayers.  It is the most unique corporate entity in the world; and, the most foolhardy in how it has squandered its assets with debt.  Other nations are in the same condition.  Fiat currency leads to this ruin.  Banking cartels make their money financing governments and running their funds through the FOREX casino.  In 2007, Bank of America turned a 350 million dollar net profit just by trading currency on the Foreign Exchange-- the largest casino in the world.  It was the insde game played by Daimler Benz that same year so it could turn a profit the same way, not by building and selling cars.  The globe is awash in a sea of dead paper.  At what point the bell will ring and all noteholders (that is what you are when you have a buck in your pocket or have some in a bank) at once call for their debts to be repaid or their markers brought in, that point is anybody's guess.  But it will bring down some...
     show more
  • Terry Gain Today 08:04 AM
    My favourite is demand 3:  "Guaranteed living wage income, regardless of employment." Or more succintly: Bucks For Breathing.
  • I am really surprised at the comments to this site. I work for a computer company and I try to run 2 companies of my own. Farming and cattle. I live in an area that is one of the most prolific in the production of Meth. My area is ALL DemocRAT! Most on Welfare/SS or disablity! Very few are actually productive! I see "fiat currency", "Sudafed" as a symptom not cause. What? The cause is that a lot of folks of this Great country have become pathologially dependent.
    Read "The Liberal Mind: The Physchological Causes of Political Madness" if you can. Start you own company! Read the article again. Again and again. If you think; this article hits home! Now for homework; why do you think that corporations are moving their companies and workforce over seas? Hint: you.
  • Robert Smith Today 08:25 AM
    When I heard that one of the Wall Street protesters' recent demands was a $20 per hour minimum wage I remembered that the UAW workers were also there to support them.  Is it just a coincidence that General Motors just signed a new union contract which provides entry level workers with a $19.28 per hour starting wage?
  • Navyvet Today 08:44 AM
    Steve Jobs was just as much an "evil capitalist" than any of the other Wall Street millionaires that these protestors are demonstrating against. Don't they realize that his "cool products" were the result of his hard-driving stewardship of Apple in which CEO Jobs was just as nasty and tyrannical as any other head of a large corporation. Plus he was using Chinese labor in sweat shops that probably are worse than any factory in America's past. When will the liberals wake up and realize capitalism created their world--and their "cool" products like I-phones and I-pods? And they think we should adopt socialism as a model! They suffer from the worst case of intellectual dissonance that I've ever seen!
  • PattyMor Today 09:14 AM
    This ragtag bunch of protestors is just the warm up for next year.  Why next year?  Its because its an election year and the Prez is very unpopular.  Rampant spending, but no jobs makes for a very toxic brew.  And the Leftist are not willing to give up power.  Remember, Obama was THE ONE.
    One what, you ask?  A full blown totalitarian.  This is just the dress  rehersal for the riots for 2012.  Then Obamalini will have an "excuse" to cancel the elections.  Its for the people, you know.  Its always for the people.
  • allen7777 Today 09:23 AM
    To simplify matters, the demonstrators want benefits, paid for by the despised productive rich. It is true that they don't have a clear perspective as to how things work. Yet that overlooks the psychology of the irresponsible who feel they want it and that's all that matters. Moreover their approach has worked for a long time, where the government distributes wealth, and tells its beneficiaries that they deserve it. So are they being irrational when they carry on?
  • Paul Murphy Today 10:13 AM
    Dear Ms. Feldmann:
    I think you're missing a couple of things here:
    1) the organizers, probably including the guy whose list of demands you quote, for the "occupy" movement are in and from Vancouver, Canada. That's foreign interference in American affairs - I'm Canadian too, but this goes, I think, beyond reasonable limits.
    2) the beneficiaries are in Washington - Pelosi's support is not a happy coincidence and neither is union involvment - this is part of the hate movement underlying Democratic party election strategies. It's scarily like what happened in Germany in about 1933/4 when another national socialist movement swept  all barriers of decency away in an avalange of hate.
    3) You seem to think the occupiers miss the message implicit in the technology they use. I doubt that, I think these people are grown children - emotional six year olds searching for a daddy whose money and power are infinite and whose gifts simply appear from thin air. You seem to think they're stupid and selfish, I think they're manipulated victims with no idea of what's been done to them.
  • Paul from SA Today 10:39 AM
    The national media coverage of the protesters is getting amusing.  They are trying so hard to make them appear authentic, legit, smart and thoughtful.  They want so much for this to inspire turnout against Republicans, and for Obama.  I think it will fizzle out.  They are too unappealing to America.  Much like Bill Maher, Rosie O'Donnel, Janeane Garafola, and Michael Moore, the liberal media don't really want this group to become some type of national spokemen or face for the Democrat party.  They are an embarrassment.  Let's see more.  Let's report what they are saying.

    They tried to drum up an OWS protest in San Antonio.  The top story from local news that day, from morning to night, was that one female protester was naked wearing only 2 pot leaves.  30 people showed up.  I'm not sure what that says about them or us!
  • joinamerica Today 11:00 AM
    Ms. Feldman's remark about Obama's organizational tendencies also brought to mind the 100 million dollars in grant money that Mr. Obama and Bill Ayers were given to improve the Chicago Schools. They used the money to teach the parents how to organize and demand more for their children. At the end of the grant period, Mr. Obama and Mr. Ayers admitted that their was no improvement in the Chicago schools as a result of their project.

    What was so upsetting was that these schools are so wretched, they cannot even get teachers or even substitute teachers and many children will sit unattended in a classroom for an entire day, never mind actually being taught anything, these children aren't even supervised. And the misguided Mr. Obama and Mr. Ayers wasted 100 million dollars on community organizing, a failed, useless undertaking in inner cities demoralized by 3 generations of welfare.

    I believe that history will judge the liberals very severely for the millions of lives their vote buying (aka welfare) destroyed and continues to destroy. Damaging the lives of those people, in my mind, is far more damning than the 13 trillion dollars of taxpayers' money which has been the cost to...
     show more
  • cliffyk Today 11:02 AM
    PattyMor, I am saddened to say that I place 50/50 odds on what you describe actually happening--it is not going to be pretty...
  • clarice Today 11:14 AM
    Patty, I think they are really turning off more people than they are turning on, but we shall see.
  • curved space Today 11:38 AM
    These unwittingly able, trainable, chanting, marching, energy-surplussed young urban combatants are making the best case for reinstatement of the military draft we've seen since 1973.
  • This manifesto is merely union driven card check in disguise.  Demand wickedly labeled Number 13 - CARD CHECK!!!

    This is so clearly a union-driven hoax. First clue was the only jobs asked to be protected were all public sector jobs: police, fire, teachers nurses -- all union jobs. The big scandal only a few month ago was the righteous outrage about the huge and unsustainable salaries, benefits, job security, paid days off and retirement benefits granted only public sector employees. That remains the primary drain on young people's futures. Yet, this astro-turf deflection driven by those very unions is trying to bury this real assault on US prosperity. Don't let them. Plus how bogus  to claim 1% of the "corporation" voters can drown out their claim of 99% they claim are being now disenfranchised by this one percent. They are voters, But they keep voting in the problems - public sector union friends in Congress and now inserting card check in this highly devious agenda hoping people stop reading after the first few outrageous demands.
  • They don't want jobs. They want money. Someone else's money. And they don't want to work for it.
  • NavyVet was right about Jobs......before u start applying Sainthood to him....remember with all that worth Apple employed 300,000 people......over 250,000 of those jobs were in mainland China.....he was visionary, but he was always a businessman.....

Friday, October 7, 2011

H CAIN GIVES MSNBC LIBTARD A DONKEY WHOOPPING


MEDIAYOU‘RE ’DISTORTING’ WHAT I SAID: HERMAN CAIN BATTLES LAWRENCE O’DONNELL ON MSNBC

There’s a lot we could cover regarding the back-and-forth interview Thursday night between Lawrence O’Donnell and Herman Cain. A lot. But we’ll focus on one thing: O‘Donnell’s smug accusations that Cain sat on the “sidelines” during the Civil Rights Movement and Cain’s response. Oh boy — here we go.
Let‘s start with Mediaite’s explanation of the exchange:
O’Donnell and Cain talked about so much more, as well, from a passage in Cain’s book where he describes “staying out of trouble” rather than directly participate in the civil rights movement, to Cain’s military service. O’Donnell, in fact, openly admonished Cain for his lack of participation in the movement — which, obviously, did not sit well with Cain one bit. “Did you expect every black student and every black college in America to be out there in the middle of every fight? The answer is no.”
That’s a good start. But there’s also plenty of of other quotes to work in. Like this one from O’Donnell:
“Mr. Cain, in fact you were in college from 1963 to 1967, at the height of the Civil Rights Movement, exactly when the most important demonstrations and protests were going on. You could easily, as a student at Morehouse [College]…actively participated in the kinds of protests that got African-Americans  the rights they enjoy today. You watched from that perspective at Morehouse when you were not participating in those processes…black college students form around the country and white college students from around the country come to the South and be murdered fighting for the right of African-Americans. Do you regret sitting on those sidelines at that time?”
Wow. That question followed an earlier one where O’Donnell suggested that if Rosa Parks and 60s-era black would have taken his [Cain's] father’s advice and stayed out of trouble, blacks would not have won their civil rights.
Not surprisingly, as the tension built and Cain increasingly became annoyed at the accusatory and suggestive questions, Cain finally let O’Donnell have it:
“Lawrence, Lawrence, Lawrence, I’m going to– I’m going to try this one more time. I graduated from High School in 1963. I didn’t start college until the fall of 1963. Now I don‘t understand why you’re trying to make a big deal out of this small point, when we have an economy on life support. WE got 14 million people out of work, and you want to try and deduce something that is incorrect form my words in my book. OK? Let’s do the people of this country a service, Lawrence.”
And with that, O’Donnell moved on to — homosexuality.
You can watch the Civil Rights Movement part in the first clip, and the rest of the interview in the second one:

Gone in 60 Nanoseconds A scientific discovery changes everything we think we know about the world.


CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER
Gone in 60 Nanoseconds 
A scientific discovery changes everything we think we know about the world.

“We don’t allow faster-than-light neutrinos in here,” says the bartender.
A neutrino walks into a bar.
— Joke circulating on the Internet
The world as we know it is on the brink of disintegration, on the verge of dissolution. No, I’m not talking about the collapse of the euro, of international finance, of the Western economies, of the democratic future, of the unipolar moment, of the American dream, of French banks, of Greece as a going concern, of Europe as an idea, of Pax Americana.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ADVERTISEMENT
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I am talking about something far more important. Which is why it made only the back pages of your newspaper, if it made it at all. Scientists at CERN (the European high-energy physics consortium) have announced the discovery of a particle that can travel faster than light.
Neutrinos fired 454 miles from a supercollider outside Geneva to an underground laboratory in Gran Sasso, Italy, took less time (60 nanoseconds less) than light to get there. Or so the physicists think. Or so they measured. Or so they have concluded after checking for every possible artifact and experimental error.
The implications of such a discovery are so mind boggling, however, that these same scientists immediately requested that other labs around the world try to replicate the experiment. Something must have been wrong to account for a result that, if we know anything about the universe, is impossible.
And that’s the problem. It has to be impossible because, if not, everything we know about the universe is wrong.
The fundamental axiom of Einstein’s theory of relativity is the absolute prohibition on speed faster than light. Einstein’s predictions about how time slows and mass increases as one approaches the speed of light have been verified by a mountain of experimental evidence. As velocity increases, mass approaches infinity and time slows to zero, making it progressively and, ultimately, infinitely difficult to achieve light speed. Which is why nothing does. And nothing ever has.
Until two weeks ago Thursday.
That’s when the results were announced. To oversimplify grossly: If the Gran Sasso scientists had a plate to record the arrival of the neutrinos and a super-powerful telescope to peer (through the Alps!) directly into the lab in Geneva from which they were being fired, the Gran Sasso guys would have “heard” the neutrinos clanging against the plate before they observed the Geneva guys squeeze the trigger on the neutrino gun.
Sixty nanoseconds before, to be precise. Wrap your mind around that one.
It’s as if someone told you that yesterday at drive time Topeka was released from Earth’s gravity. These things don’t happen. Natural laws don’t just expire between shifts at McDonald’s.
Not that there aren’t already mysteries in physics. Neutrinos themselves are ghostly particles that travel through nearly everything unimpeded. (Thousands are traversing your body as you read this.) But that is simplicity itself compared to quantum mechanics, whose random arbitrariness so offended Einstein that he famously objected that God does not play dice with the universe.
Aphorisms don’t trump reality, however. They are but a frail, poignant protest against a Nature that disdains the most cherished human notions of order and elegance, truth and beauty.
But if quantum mechanics was a challenge to human sensibilities, this pesky Swiss-Italian neutrino is their undoing. It means that Einstein’s relativity — a theory of uncommon beauty upon which all of physics has been built for 100 years — is wrong. Not just inaccurate. Not just flawed. But deeply, fundamentally, indescribably wrong.
It means that the “standard model” of subatomic particles that stands at the center of all modern physics is wrong.
Nor does it stop there. This will not just overthrow physics. Astronomy and cosmology measure time and distance in the universe on the assumption of light speed as the cosmic limit. Their foundations will shake as well.
It cannot be. Yet, this is not a couple of guys in a garage peddling cold fusion. This is no crank wheeling a perpetual-motion machine into the patent office. These are the best researchers in the world using the finest measuring instruments, having subjected their data to the highest levels of scrutiny, including six months of cross-checking by 160 scientists from eleven countries.
But there must be some error. Because otherwise everything changes. We shall need a new physics. A new cosmology. New understandings of past and future, of cause and effect. Then shortly and surely, new theologies.
Why? Because you can’t have neutrinos getting kicked out of taverns they have not yet entered.
— Charles Krauthammer is a national syndicated columnist. © 2011, The Washington Post Writers Group.

Thursday, October 6, 2011

Detroit terror suspect accused of vehicular jihad against FBI agent


Detroit terror suspect accused of vehicular jihad against FBI agent

DETROIT – A federal judge in Michigan has ordered a man suspected of supporting terrorist groups held on allegations he tried to crash into the car of an FBI agent who was following him as part of heightened security for the 10th anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks.
Reed S. Berry, 26, of St. Joseph was under surveillance because of his suspected terrorist links, according to an FBI affidavit filed in U.S. District Court in Grand Rapids.
The government has said the links include Internet communication with one or more groups involved in international terrorism.
Defense lawyer Elias Muawad said what the government has labeled terrorist links in court filings appear to be online speech protected by the First Amendment. He also said his client, Berry, has been upset about being under investigation for months, subject to searches and barred from air travel.
“He was feeling like a caged person,” Muawad told The Associated Press on Sunday.
According to the Sept. 23 complaint that charged Berry with assaulting a federal officer, the FBI executed a search warrant March 9 seeking evidence linking Berry to foreign terrorist groups.
“The FBI investigation to date has developed information that Berry was using the Internet both to contact and to provide affirmative support to one or more FTOs,” or foreign terrorist organizations, the complaint said.
The FBI then got a warrant May 11 to search Berry’s Yahoo email account, and investigators now are reviewing its contents, the complaint said.
In anticipation of the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, “the FBI decided to maintain around-the-clock knowledge of Berry’s whereabouts that weekend,” the complaint said.
FBI Special Agent Samuel Moore and Michigan State Police Detective Sgt. Larry Dyksterhouse were watching Berry the night of Sept. 9 and had been told that their “target” was aware he was under surveillance, the complaint said.
The agents followed Berry as he drove around Benton Harbor and St. Joseph. They said he traveled to various locations and at one point turned his headlights off and just sat in the vehicle.
Moore said Berry eventually put his car in reverse and began speeding toward Moore’s stopped vehicle. The agent said he “immediately accelerated forward and to the hard left, avoiding a direct collision” with Berry.
On Wednesday, U.S. Magistrate Hugh Brenneman in Grand Rapids ordered Berry detained before the assault trial.
“In addition to the present offense, defendant is well aware the FBI is using considerable resources to investigate whether defendant has been participating in terrorist-related activities,” Brenneman wrote in his order that Berry stay behind bars until trial.
Brenneman also cited the fact that Berry has a wife in London and “has told the FBI he wants to leave this country and never return.” And, the judge said, Berry’s state criminal record shows “a repeated disregard of the judicial system” with bond and parole revocations.

Frank Miller’s superhero takes on al Qaeda in ‘Holy Terror’ (video)


Frank Miller’s superhero takes on al Qaeda in ‘Holy Terror’ (video)

The trailer:
Bonus below the fold: Where has all the good propaganda gone?
Imagine if all the well-known superheroes and Hollywood would have taken on al Qaeda full speed after 9/11 instead of cowering and appeasing Muslims?

Featured Post

RT @anti_commie32: Keep up the great work!!! https://t.co/FIAnl1hxwG

RT @anti_commie32: Keep up the great work!!! https://t.co/FIAnl1hxwG — Joseph Moran (@JMM7156) May 2, 2023 from Twitter https://twitter....