Friday, October 21, 2011

iPad 2 Tips, Tricks, and Shortcuts


iPad 2 Tips, Tricks, and Shortcuts

If you've seen an Apple commercial, you have an idea of the latest iPad can do, but iOS holds some hidden gems—we've uncovered 20 of them.
Apple iPad 2
While some might argue that it can almost replace a full-fledged computer, the iPad was designed to be simple. Even if you have very little tech savvy, you can probably pick up Apple's latest tablet and master most of the basic features in a matter of minutes. And the longer you spend swiping your way around the touch-based iOS operatingsystem, the more you'll learn. Like it is with any OS, though, there are just some things that aren't obvious. You could (gasp!) pore through the 22-chapter iPad 2 User Guide (it's got three appendices too), to make sure you're not missing out on anything, but where's the fun in that?
After a couple of months of testing and using the iPad 2, we've learned some cool tricks and we want to share them with you. In the slideshow, you'll find general tips that apply to multiple applications, along with those specific to Safari, Maps, iPod, and Photos. Whether you're a seasoned Mac or iOS user, or even an Apple newbie, there's something here tohelp you get the most out of your iPad 2. (Actually, come to think of it, a lot of these tips also apply to the original iPad.) Have a tip, trick, or shortcut of your own to share? Let us know in the comments below.
Looking for some great iPad apps to get your started? Check out The 75 Best iPad Apps. Also, 10 Apps that Show off the iPad 2's New Hardware offers up some picks optimized for the latest tablet.

Respected Historian Has This To Say About U.S.


David Kaiser - Respected Historian Has This To Say About U.S.  (This attribution may be incorrect be sure to read the Snopes analysis at bottom)  Who ever wrote it, I believe the analysis is very good.   SM1.

David Kaiser is a respected historian whose published works have covered a broad range of topics, from European Warfare to American League Baseball. Born in 1947, the son of a diplomat, Kaiser spent his childhood in three capital cities: Washington D.C. , Albany , New York , and Dakar , Senegal . He attended Harvard University , graduating there in 1969 with a B.A. in history. He then spent several years more at Harvard, gaining a PhD in history, which he obtained in 1976. He served in the Army Reserve from 1970 to 1976.

He is a professor in the Strategy and Policy Department of the United States Naval War College . He has previously taught at Carnegie Mellon, Williams College and Harvard University . Kaiser's latest book, The Road to Dallas , about the Kennedy assassination, was just published by Harvard University Press.

Dr. David Kaiser

History Unfolding

I am a student of history. Professionally, I have written 15 books on history that have been published in six languages, and I have studied history all my life. I have come to think there is something monumentally large afoot, and I do not believe it is simply a banking crisis, or a mortgage crisis, or a credit crisis. Yes these exist, but they are merely single facets on a very large gemstone that is only now coming into a sharper focus.

Something of historic proportions is happening. I can sense it because I know how it feels, smells, what it looks like, and how people react to it. Yes, a perfect storm may be brewing, but there is something happening within our country that has been evolving for about ten to fifteen years. The pace has dramatically quickened in the past two.

We demand and then codify into law the requirement that our banks make massive loans to people we know they can never pay back? Why?

We learned just days ago that the Federal Reserve, which has little or no real oversight by anyone, has "loaned" two trillion dollars (that is $2,000,000,000,000) over the past few months, but will not tell us to whom or why or disclose the terms. That is our money. Yours and mine. And that is three times the $700 billion we all argued about so strenuously just this past September. Who has this money? Why do they have it? Why are the terms unavailable to us? Who asked for it? Who authorized it? I thought this was a government of "we the people," who loaned our powers to our elected leaders. Apparently not.

We have spent two or more decades intentionally de-industrializing our economy. Why?

We have intentionally dumbed down our schools, ignored our history, and no longer teach our founding documents, why we are exceptional, and why we are worth preserving. Students by and large cannot write, think critically, read, or articulate. Parents are not revolting, teachers are not picketing, school boards continue to back mediocrity. Why?

We have now established the precedent of protesting every close election (violently in California over a proposition that is so controversial that it simply wants marriage to remain defined as between one man and one woman. Did you ever think such a thing possible just a decade ago?) We have corrupted our sacred political process by allowing unelected judges to write laws that radically change our way of life, and then mainstream Marxist groups like ACORN and others to turn our voting system into a banana republic. To what purpose?

Now our mortgage industry is collapsing, housing prices are in free fall, major industries are failing, our banking system is on the verge of collapse, social security is nearly bankrupt, as is Medicare and our entire government. Our education system is worse than a joke (I teach college and I know precisely what I am talking about) - the list is staggering in its length, breadth, and depth. It is potentially 1929 x ten...And we are at war with an enemy we cannot even name for fear of offending people of the same religion, who, in turn, cannot wait to slit the throats of your children if they have the opportunity to do so.

And finally, we have elected a man that no one really knows anything about, who has never run so much as a Dairy Queen, let alone a town as big as Wasilla , Alaska ... All of his associations and alliances are with real radicals in their chosen fields of employment, and everything we learn about him, drip by drip, is unsettling if not downright scary (Surely you have heard him speak about his idea to create and fund a mandatory civilian defense force stronger than our military for use inside our borders? No? Oh, of course. The media would never play that for you over and over and then demand he answer it.

Mr. Obama's winning platform can be boiled down to one word: Change. Why?

I have never been so afraid for my country and for my children as I am now.

This man campaigned on bringing people together, something he has never, ever done in his professional life. In my assessment, Obama will divide us along philosophical lines, push us apart, and then try to realign the pieces into a new and different power structure. Change is indeed coming. And when it comes, you will never see the same nation again.

And that is only the beginning..

As a serious student of history, I thought I would never come to experience what the ordinary, moral German must have felt in the mid-1930s In those times, the "savior" was a former smooth-talking rabble-rouser from the streets, about whom the average German knew next to nothing. What they should have known was that he was associated with groups that shouted, shoved, and pushed around people with whom they disagreed; he edged his way onto the political stage through great oratory. Conservative "losers" read it right now.

And there were the promises. Economic times were tough, people were losing jobs, and he was a great speaker. And he smiled and frowned and waved a lot. And people, even newspapers, were afraid to speak out for fear that his "brown shirts" would bully and beat them into submission. Which they did - regularly. And then, he was duly elected to office, while a full-throttled economic crisis bloomed at hand - the Great Depression. Slowly, but surely, he seized the controls of government power, person-by-person, department-by-department, and bureaucracy-by-bureaucracy. The children of German citizens were, at first, encouraged to join a Youth Movement in his name where they were taught exactly what to think. Later, they were required to do so. No Jews of course,

How did he get people on his side? He did it by promising jobs to the jobless, money to the money-less, and rewards for the military-industrial complex. He did it by indoctrinating the children, advocating gun control, health care for all, better wages, better jobs, and promising to re-instill pride once again in the country, across Europe , and across the world. He did it with a compliant media - did you know that? And he did this all in the name of justice and ..... change. And the people surely got what they voted for.

If you think I am exaggerating, look it up. It's all there in the history books.

So read your history books. Many people of conscience objected in 1933 and were shouted down, called names, laughed at, and ridiculed. When Winston Churchill pointed out the obvious in the late 1930s while seated in the House of Lords in England (he was not yet Prime Minister), he was booed into his seat and called a crazy troublemaker. He was right, though. And the world came to regret that he was not listened to..

Do not forget that Germany was the most educated, the most cultured country in Europe . It was full of music, art, museums, hospitals, laboratories, and universities. And yet, in less than six years (a shorter time span than just two terms of the U. S. presidency) it was rounding up its own citizens, killing others, abrogating its laws, turning children against parents, and neighbors against neighbors. All with the best of intentions, of course. The road to Hell is paved with them.

As a practical thinker, one not overly prone to emotional decisions, I have a choice: I can either believe what the objective pieces of evidence tell me (even if they make me cringe with disgust); I can believe what history is shouting to me from across the chasm of seven decades; or I can hope I am wrong by closing my eyes, having another latte, and ignoring what is transpiring around me.

I choose to believe the evidence. No doubt some people will scoff at me, others laugh, or think I am foolish, naive, or both. To some degree, perhaps I am. But I have never been afraid to look people in the eye and tell them exactly what I believe-and why I believe it.

I pray I am wrong. I do not think I am. Perhaps the only hope is our vote in the next elections.

David Kaiser

Jamestown , Rhode Island


Re: David Kaiser - Respected Historian Has This To Say About U.S.

Except, uh, David Kaiser says he didn't say that.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/proportions.asp


 

Obama's New Economy - Creeping Socialism


Obama's New Economy - Creeping Socialism

By Nicholas Contompasis

"Make people dependent on government and they will embrace Socialism"
- N.P. Contompasis

Have you noticed that the Obama Administration is attempting to create a new economy within our existing economy. A new economy that is funded by your tax dollars and controlled by friends of Obama.
Friends of Obama include union leaders, many non-profit organizations, campaign contributors and many foreign interests that want harm to come to our great economy.
After reviewing most of these new Obama led companies and their handling of your tax dollars, I predict they will continue to lose money. This will put added pressure to raise even more taxes to keep the failing companies going. General Motors, Chrysler, Solyndra, Tefla and many more are companies invented or propped up by the far Left. They would never survive in a normal capitalist environment.
Now, envision a cancerous tumor spreading throughout a host body as it slowly takes over, with an ultimate outcome of complete domination of the host. You would then have a new economy funded purely by your tax dollars. The majority of what you earn would be sent to the government to be redistributed, not to the poor, but the new industrial leaders of the country's new economy - friends of Obama.
Our current private sector companies get little to no help from government. As a matter of fact, our government, led by Obama, is doing everything possible to overburden our existing private sector with regulations that are killing its efficiencies. This policy works in favor of Obama's new economy, pushing down the traditional while funding and promoting his new Obama led companies that will suck the country dry due to their inefficiencies.
You can then deduce that these companies exist for only one reason. That reason is to enrich the friends of Obama and, of course, Obama himself.
You would think that Obama would've learned from the failed socialist states now crumbling around the world!
Under Socialism, sharing the wealth equitably is fine, but it never seems to work out that way, now does it?

New golf terms


New golf terms
Some new golf terms to use when you're
Out on the course...
A 'Rock Hudson' - a putt that looked straight, but wasn't.
A 'Saddam Hussein' - from one bunker into another.
A 'Yasser Arafat' - butt ugly and in the sand.
A 'John Kennedy Jr.' - didn't quite make it over the water.
A 'Rodney King' - over-clubbed.
An 'O.J.'- got away with one.
A 'Princess Grace' - should have used a driver.
A 'Princess Di' - shouldn't have used the driver.
A 'Condom' - safe, but didn't feel very good.
A 'Brazilian' - shaved the hole.
A 'Rush Limbaugh' - a little to the right.
A 'Nancy Pelosi' - Way to the left and out of bounds.
A 'James Joyce' - a putt that's impossible to read.
A 'Ted Kennedy' - goes in the water and jumps out.
A 'Pee Wee Herman' - too much wrist.
A 'Sonny Bono' - straight into the trees.
A 'Paris Hilton' - a very expensive hole.
A `Tiger Woods' - Oops, Wrong Hole.

iPhone 4S Review


iPhone 4S Review

The iPhone 4S is the best phone you can buy right now. That's been true of every iPhone, really.
The other thing that's been true about every new iPhone, except perhaps the iPhone 4: Most of the fresh magic is in the software. When Steve Jobs announced the original iPhone, he said the software is "five years ahead of what's on any other phone." It's kind of crazy that he wasn't far off, since it's taken nearly five years for other phone software to even come close, with the latest Windows Phone and possibly the next Android.
And it's really subtle, but perhaps the most important thing about the 4S—not to me or to you—is that it's the first iPhone that's truly post-PC, thanks to a couple pieces of software called Siri and iCloud. (I know Android was there first, but if you want to quibble over that, you're missing the point. I have an HP TouchPad I'd like to sell you, though.)
***
It doesn't look new. It looks the way you now expect a phone to look. Glass and metal and glass. The iPhone 4 was breathtaking because it was a radical reinvention within a radically constrained space, an utterly functionalist reduction of a touchscreen phone to its bare essentials. The antenna literally holds the phone together. It was unmistakably an iPhone. But it was unmistakably different. The 4S is very mistakably undifferent.
It's hard to reinvent the phonewheel every year, I guess. There perhaps still isn't a better designed or constructed phone in the world. I don't know of one coming any time soon. And the one flaw of that design, the external antenna's weak spot, is dead. But I'm considering putting my iPhone in a case for the very first time. Something organic, like bamboo. So you'll know mine is different from yours.
***
iPhone 4S ReviewThe iPhone 4S's camera is probably better than your phone's camera. The iPhone 4's camera was the first good camera in a phone I'd genuinely tell you to buy since, like, the Nokia N95, but it has a tendency to oversaturate, trading accuracy for eye-pleasing punch. The 4S's photos pack more pixels, the colors are more accurate, the details are shaper, the low light performance is better. And it's faster. Noticeably, but not dramatically so. Of the cameras in some of the highest end American phones you can buy today—the Amaze 4G, Droid Bionic and Galaxy S II—I think the 4S's photos are the best, followed closely by the Galaxy S II, whose color palette is slightly more neutral. (You can judge for yourself with these untouched, full-res photos and videos, of course.) I rarely pulled out my beloved S90 after I got an iPhone 4. The 4's photosedged into good enough. The 4S sits there, quite comfortably. I don't think you'll need a separate point-and-shoot again, either.
And if the Flip camera had not died a year ago, it would be on a death march. The 4S's 1080p, 30-frames-per-second HD video is excellent, surprisingly so. It's not the best, though. The 1080p video taken by the Galaxy S II is ever so slightly more detailed, the colors more accurate—the 4S's video has a definite sense of warmth that sometimes doesn't quite exist in reality. It's why I'd get a 32GB phone, though.
It's my favorite camera to use on any phone, because it is the easiest, and almost always does exactly what I want it to.
***
If you have an iPhone 4, the least compelling reason to upgrade is speed. It has a dual-core A5 chip and it is demonstrably, incontradictably faster than the iPhone 4. But not blisteringly so, not enough I felt the speed on a day-to-day basis, like you did between the 3GS and the 4. And I think sometimes Windows Phone feels even faster, but that's mostly because of the clever way it's animated. (The Galaxy S II may be equally quick, but the shitty, stuttering animations make it seem less responsive.) Watching Infinity Blade load, I don't doubt that dual-core A5 chip and 7x faster graphics will come in handy with apps coming out over the next year, though.
And apparently you need the power for Siri, according to Apple. She only rides in Ferraris. Made out of silicon.
***
iPhone 4S ReviewI don't know if you've ever heard me speak. My normal voice is like drunken slurring thrown in a blender with a mumbling dock worker and the geekiest kid you knew in high school, but on methamphetamines. Siri, the iPhone 4S's virtual assistant, understands me almost as well as humans do—I'd gauge around 85 percent. Windows Phone's voice command hovers somewhere around 80 percent, and Android's around 70 percent.


What makes Siri vastly better than what's on any other phone right now is that it groks humanspeak. It's human enough. "Is it going to be cold tomorrow?" I'm looking at the weather report for NYC. "Where I can grab a beer?" A list of bars appears. "Is Brian Lam around?" Find My Friends, and I'm staring at a light purple dot on the western fringes of Brooklyn. Or a million other commands, nefarious or otherwise. It's so cleverly designed you never quite feel like you're being forced to remember a script, so whenever Siri failed to understand me, I was far more forgiving than when my Kinect, with its handful of keywords, doesn't know what the hell I'm asking it to do. It still made me sad, though: the higher the expectations, the higher the fall.
Siri's a lot of fun. But I mostly stopped reaching out to her after the third day, slipping back into my old routines. I suspect when I'm driving a lot over the next month, Siri and I might be friends again.
***
There are reasons to go with every carrier. I'm sticking it out with AT&T, because I have unlimited data, and its 4S can be faster for data than Verizon or Sprint's. Verizon's network is the most reliable, at least in New York, and it'll likely have the best 4G network for whenever the iPhone gets 4G. Sprint's the only carrier to offer unlimited data plans to new iPhone customers. There are reasons to not go with every carrier, too. AT&T's network can be crummy like bad biscuits in New York (it hasn't seemed better with the 4S than the 4). Verizon's 4S data speeds are slower, and I hate their customer service. Sprint's iPhone 4S has the slowest data we've seen, and they recently yanked away unlimited data from hotspots without grandfathering in current customers.

Does somebody wanna start a wireless carrier with me?
***
iPhone 4S ReviewThere's a feeling from Android that you never quite used to get from the iPhone, this sensation of being constantly connected, always in the middle of everything, like you were standing barefoot in the middle of a cold, shallow stream. That's there now with iOS 5.
The Notifications Center is the primary reason, I think, because everything that's waiting for you to deal with it is right there, with a swipe. It completely changed the way I use my iPhone, and the way I feel when I use it. It's like I can touch a million different parts of it simultaneously, like if I were a giant octopus with a million tentacles. Things could be even better though: Why do I have to manually clear out Facebook notifications still waiting for me after I've already opened the app? Why are the X's to clear stuff out so damn small? Why can't it be smarter, like webOS and the Android? And multitasking in general: It needs to feel more fluid, more natural, more powerful, less like a bolted-on afterthought than it does now.
Then there's iMessages. It didn't feel different from texting, other than the fact it'd work on Wi-Fi and it was free and the bubbles were blue, until I got in a fight with a girl and then it felt way more like instant messaging, way more tethered, than SMS. And it's even better on the iPad, says Adrian.
And the other thing is location, and the new way it's used in iOS 5. Find My Friends is a game-changer. I've already used it to crash a co-worker's apartment and ruin his Friday night. Foursquare lets me know every time I pass a restaurant I want to go to. Reminders tells me to send emails when I get to work. It also makes it feel more like Android, in that it killed my battery roughly 30 percent faster.
Oh. The other other thing. When I pulled this phone out of the box, I didn't plug it into a computer. I punched in my iCloud account. And my blank iPhone 4S suddenly looked a lot like my iPhone 4. Over a year ago, I asked why I wasn't the center of the Apple universe. Why I had to plug my iThing into a computer. I don't anymore. It syncs, wirelessly, to iCloud. Or to my computer, when I want it to. It means never worrying again about the last time I synced my phone. Or dumped photos. iCloud's not perfect. But it's good, and it's a security net way too many people lived without.
There are a lot of other new things in iOS 5. Like 200 or so, mostly small, but nice things, like hourly weather updates, or deleting songs from your phone, or Twitter built right in. But connection. That's the main one.
I wish iOS 5 felt fresher, though.
***
I suppose you could wait and see if the Nokia Windows Phone is going to be amazing, or if the gargantuan Galaxy Nexus is the Android phone that finally gets creature comforts correct.
But I don't think they'll be better than the iPhone 4S, not really, though they may come very, very close, closer than anything's come before, like an asymptote.
This is the phone to buy, for most people. Not if you have an iPhone 4, but for everybody else. Next year, five years after the iPhone, maybe things will be different.

WE'VE FIGURED HIM OUT! THE 'O' THAT BLOWS


WE'VE FIGURED HIM OUT! By Ben Stein
Why was President Barack Obama in such a hurry to get his socialized medicine bill passed? Because he and his cunning circle realize some basic truths:
The American people in their unimaginable kindness and trust voted for a pig in a poke in 2008.
(Pig in a poke means: an offering or deal that is foolishly accepted without being examined first. A poke means sack.)
They wanted so much to believe Barack Obama was somehow better and different from other ultra-leftists that they simply took him on faith.
They ignored his anti-white writings in his books.
They ignored his quiet acceptance of hysterical anti-American diatribes by his minister, Jeremiah Wright.
They ignored his refusal to explain years at a time of his life as a student.
They ignored his ultra-left record as a "community organizer," Illinois state legislator, and Senator.
The American people ignored his total zero of an academic record as a student and teacher, his complete lack of scholarship when he was being touted as a scholar.
Now, the American people are starting to wake up to the truth. Barack Obama is a super likeable super leftist, and not a fan of this country.
The American people have already awakened to the truth that the stimulus bill -- a great idea in theory -- was really an immense bribe to Democrat interest groups, and in no way helped all Americans.
The American people already know that Mr. Obama's plan to lower health costs while expanding coverage and bureaucracy is a myth, a promise of something that never was and never can be -- "a bureaucracy lowering costs in a free society." Either the costs go up or the free society goes away... an historical truth.
These are perilous times. Mrs. Hillary Clinton, our Secretary of State, has given Iran the go-ahead to have nuclear weapons, an unqualified betrayal of the nation. Now, we face a devastating loss of freedom at home in health care. It will be joined by controls on our lives to "protect us" from global warming, itself largely a fraud, if believed to be caused by man. She has also signed on to a Small Firearms Treaty at the U.N. This is a back door gun control move. This is approved by the Senate and a 2nd Amendment majority doesn't exist in the Senate now. It will supersede all U.S. Law and the 2nd Amendment. All citizen possession will be eliminated through confiscation. Just Like Great Britain and Australia .
Mr. Obama knows Americans are getting wise and will stop him if he delays at all in taking away our freedoms. There is his urgency and our opportunity. Once freedom is lost, America is lost. Wake up, beloved America .
Ben Stein is a writer, economist, and lawyer living in Beverly Hills and Malibu .. He writes "Ben Stein's Diary" for every issue of The American Spectator.

Unhappy times at the White House


Unhappy times at the White House

By Wesley Pruden
Good old Joe, always good for a laugh. However, that’s not President Obama or the White House wise men holding their sides and rolling on the floor. Joe is endearing enough in the way of crazy uncles, but when the attic door is left unlatched someone has to be dispatched to find old Joe and pay for the damage. Joe has lately been wandering around the country trying to drum up support for the Obama jobs bill by blaming the Republicans for the regiments of rapists he sees stalking the land. He reminded an audience in Michigan that when the number of cops in Flint was reduced, violent crime increased. The Republicans in Congress oppose the jobs bill. Ergo, it’s the Republicans’ fault that so many evil men have taken up raping.
Joe got his usual laughs in the usual places, but only groans from the president’s wise men, who know better. When a reporter for Human Events, the Washington political weekly, asked Joe later at an appearance at the University of Pennsylvania whether he wanted to amend his remarks, the veep practically went postal. He shoved his finger at the reporter’s chest and let him have a bit of schoolyard bluster and bloviation. “I didn’t use, no, no, no . . . Let’s get it straight, guy. Don’t screw around with me.” (And my daddy can lick your daddy.)
Mr. Biden is endearing in the way of crazy uncles, but someone left the attic door unlatched. Biden_Obama
It’s not just old Joe. Alarm is the soup du jour not only at the White House mess, but wherever Democrats gather to groan. President Obama, winding up his bus tour of Virginia to pump a little energy into faithful fans of his $447 billion jobs package, reminded a small gathering at a firehouse in a suburb of Richmond that $35 billion of the package would go to prevent layoffs of cops and firemen. When only two people applauded, the president said: “You can go ahead and clap. Go ahead, nothing wrong with it.”
The president and his men look and sound rattled, as any serious man would be, by all the signs and slights evident everywhere they look. He put Michelle out to raise money (for $2,500, contributors can get their pictures taken with her). Someone even stole his Teleprompter. But not all the news is bad. Nancy Pelosi is said to be not talking to him.
The president’s embrace of the so-called Wall Street occupiers, after first keeping his distance, hints of reluctant romancing. All the girls, as the song goes, get prettier at closing time. The protests obviously appeal to a community organizer’s instincts and sympathies, but pollsters are telling him that the public hasn’t yet decided whether it likes or loathes the occupiers. So far there’s no indication that Occupy Wall Street is the terrific ‘60s writ large, or even small. A new Gallup Poll, taken for USA Today, finds that 22 percent of the respondents approve of the movement’s goals and 15 percent disapprove; 25 percent approve of the conduct of the occupiers and 20 percent disapprove. The figure that most of the pols see writ largest is the 63 percent who say they just don’t know enough about the movement to know what to think of it.
When Doug Schoen, a Democratic pollster, sent an agent to Zucotti Park, where the protests began, to make inquiries, he got back surprising data. Only 198 occupiers were polled, so this was hardly a scientific sampling, but an experienced pollster nevertheless is careful about whom he talks to. Only 48 percent say they will vote for Mr. Obama next year. Only about 15 percent are unemployed, and clearly aren’t the downtrodden “99 percent” they claim they are. However, “We’re the 85 percent” wouldn’t make much of a message on a tee shirt.
For sure, the protest at Zucotti Park is not a grit and granola operation imported whole from the fab ‘60s. “We’re running a five-star restaurant down there,” Eric Smith, 38, the ex-le Chef de Tournant at the Sheraton in midtown Manhattan, tells the New York Post. He works in a soup kitchen that cooks a thousand meals a day for the occupiers. “The other day, we made some wonderful salmon cakes with dill sauce and some quinoa salad and a wonderful tomato salad with fennel and red onion,’’ he said. “We use organic grass-fed meats, and the other day we made a wonderful fried rice and root vegetables and all kinds of soup.”
Someone ought to send a plate up to the attic. Joe may be a bit of gasbag, but he’s got the mood of a miserable White House down just right.
Wesley Pruden is editor emeritus of The Washington Times.

Featured Post

by Jm Moran 2025-11-12T13:45:57.000Z from Facebook via IFTTT from Facebook via IFTTT