One Citizen Speaking... |
- OBAMA BROKE THE LAW AND USED BOWE BERGDAHL AS AN EXCUSE -- WHAT MAY BE GOING ON BEHIND THE SCENES?
- A FEMA CAMP FOR CHILDREN IS COMING TO PORT HUENEME, CALIFORNIA COURTESY OF OBAMAS UNILATERAL AMNESTY
- THE PROBLEM IS NOT MASSIVE INEQUALITY, IT IS POLITICALCORRUPTION, CRONYISM, AND THE TAX AND SPEND POLICIES OF THE PROGRESSIVES
OBAMA BROKE THE LAW AND USED BOWE BERGDAHL AS AN EXCUSE -- WHAT MAY BE GOING ON BEHIND THE SCENES? Posted: 03 Jun 2014 05:48 PM PDT Why would President Obama seemingly break two laws? One, a rather minor law involving the prior notification to Congress of any proposed release of enemy combatants from the United States detention facility located in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. And two, a criminal act of giving aid and comfort to an enemy of the United States in a time of war; an offense that rises to the status of an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor. It should be noted that President Obama has claimed that the legislation requiring congressional notification was unconstitutional and an impingement on his presidential powers -- although he signed an unconstitutional act into law. As for the signing statement issued after the law became effective, the signing statement is not law and cannot authorize the breaking of a law. Here is my theory … President Obama, in pursuit of his legacy of quitting Afghanistan, needed to negotiate directly and/or indirectly with the Taliban on behalf of the United States and Hamid Karzai’s Afghan state. Possibly for two or more reasons. One, to allow an orderly withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan with little or no ambushes or fighting. Two, to prevent Afghan from immediately devolving into chaos under the control of tribal warlords before the 2016 presidential election. Three, to insure that the United States would be able to keep some troops in Afghanistan, primarily for damage control, to protect Hamid Karzai whose natural intention would be to bolt with billions of taxpayer dollars when the military withdraws, and to prevent Afghanistan and the Pakistani ISI from combining forces to the disadvantage of the United States and India. Four, to remove Bergdahl as a bargaining chip during U.S. negotiations and to deny Karzai the chance to exploit Bergdahl for his own purposes. And five, to remove the five most dangerous enemy combatants in Gitmo to downplay the relative dangerousness of the remaining detainees – setting the stage for closing of the Guantanamo facility. Whether or not Obama would actually abandon the base to Cuba is unknown – but then again, President Obama is not your traditional patriotic American President. Unfortunately for President Obama, the Taliban may have demanded the return of the five high-ranking Taliban officials as a precursor to talks and any further diplomatic action. Something that would require the approval of Congress to legitimize the transaction since it is clearly beyond the President’s unilateral power to release high-ranking enemy combatants who pose a risk to American lives. So, President Obama and his cadre of progressive socialist democrats decided to, once again, bypass Congress, and use Bowe Bergdahl’s health as an exigent circumstance that justified Obama’s unilateral action to release the five dangerous enemy combatants from Gitmo. Yes, President Obama and his cadre of progressive socialist democrats knew that Bergdahl had deserted his post and possibly was a traitor—giving aid and comfort to the enemy in a time of war. But, being King Obama and having the protection of the mainstream media, Obama probably believed that he could manage any negative media and the issue of Bergdahl’s service would fade away over time. It is amusing that Obama cited exigent circumstances involving Bergdahl's health although he entered the special forces helicopter unassisted and immediately communicated with the troops. Bottom line … I would not put it past President Obama and Valerie Jarrett to stage-manage the optics of the final withdrawal by insuring no American soldier was left in captivity. But what about otherAmerican civilians who may still be in captivity such as Caitlin Coleman, an American citizen who, along with her Canadian-born husband Josh, disappeared in Afghanistan in October 2012 and Warren Weinstein, 72, a government contractor who was doing work in Pakistan when he was kidnapped in August 2011? I would suggest that their lives are as valuable as a potential deserter/collaborator. Once again, President Obama and his cadre of progressive socialist democrats have proved that they cannot be trusted to keep America and Americans safe and secure. And, that the progressive socialist democrats act as a fifth column to destroy America from within. Ergo, the progressive socialist democrats represent a clear and present danger and must be removed from the House and Senate, along with their RINO (Republican In Name Only) cohorts that are selling out America to its enemies, both foreign and domestic and destroying America’s infrastructure and prosperity in order to bring about a socialist state. Remember this when you vote. As for my theory, only time will tell. -- steve |
A FEMA CAMP FOR CHILDREN IS COMING TO PORT HUENEME, CALIFORNIA COURTESY OF OBAMAS UNILATERAL AMNESTY Posted: 03 Jun 2014 10:31 PM PDT President and his cadre of progressive socialist democrats have created a humanitarian crisis by incentivizing illegal aliens to send their children into the country to obtain amnesty … splitting up families and encouraging child rape of girls in transit. Unbelievable, FEMA is building a humanitarian detention center nearby in Oxnard, California. Built on the Port Hueneme Naval Base, the home of the Naval Construction Battalion known as the Seabees, the center will house children who have entered the country illegally.
According to published reports, the flow across our border could reach up to 60,000 children this coming year and 130,000 by 2015 -- a cost to the United States taxpayer north of $2.BILLION. The same reports claim that the children stay 30 – 45 days and are provided with medical, education, and other forms of assistance before they are placed with a sponsor or allowed to leave with a relative. All because President Obama wanted a political win with the illegal alien activist lobby and those who get out the progressive socialist democrat vote in heavily immigrant neighborhoods. Due to the proliferation of false documents, it is unknown how many illegals actually vote in any given election and the extend to which they can affect election outcomes. It is well-known that the House of Representatives found that the number of illegal aliens voting in Loretta Sanchez’s district probably cost Robert Dornan the election. A congressional investigation found at least 748 votes against a winning margin of 984 votes – and Newt Gingrich, acting as the Speaker of the House refused to take further action to prolong the inquiry and deny her a seat in Congress. Another “historic first” as Sanchez was the first Mexican-American Representative from a conservative, but changing, Orange County (California). Bottom line .. President Barack Obama is a clear and present danger to our nation. Not only is he encouraging breaking the law, splitting families, and child rape, he is unnecessarily costing the taxpayer billions of dollars in order to purchase political support from those who support open borders and unrestricted migration. Whereas an American caught illegally in Mexico is jailed or worse, the United States is opening the floodgates to fraud. When we say children, we are talking of individuals up to about 17-1/2 years old – and that includes some of the most violent gangbangers from Mexico, El Salvador, and other countries. We must remove progressive socialist democrats from office before we no longer recognize American and are no longer Americans. -- steve |
Posted: 02 Jun 2014 07:39 PM PDT I could not help but laugh at the way the progressive socialist democrats are telling their coalition of victims that our nation, and them in particular, is suffering because of “massive inequality” … [my comments in blue italic]
Bottom line … The progressive socialist democrats and their RINO (Republican In Name Only) are a clear and present danger to America and constitute a fifth column seeking to destroy America from within. We need to eliminate the political corruption and cronyism that is currently found in politics. The most significant method of fixing our nation’s finances is to eliminate the progressive socialist democrat trade and public employee unions, reduce taxes, eliminate many of the redundant and/or nonsensical administrative rules and regulations and shrink the size and scope of government. If you cannot see this, vote for one of the most corrupt politicians in the history of the United States; one that raised cronyism to a fine art; and one that has no problem lying to the American public. Yes, folks -- vote for Hillary Clinton. Or just stick a dagger in the heart of America. -- steve |