In this mailing: Soeren Kern: Migrant Rape Epidemic Reaches Austria Lawrence A. Franklin: Iran Comes Clean on Banking Problems Raymond Ibrahim: Should the U.S. Build an "ISIS Wall"? Migrant Rape Epidemic Reaches Austria by Soeren Kern  •  May 5, 2016 at 5:00 am A 20-year-old asylum seeker from Iraq confessed to raping a 10-year-old boy at a public swimming pool in Vienna. The Iraqi said the rape was a "sexual emergency" resulting from "excess sexual energy." Those who dare to link spiraling crime to Muslim mass migration are being silenced by the guardians of Austrian multiculturalism. According to data compiled by the Austrian Interior Ministry, nearly one out of three asylum seekers in Vienna was accused of committing crimes in 2015. North African gangs fighting for control over drug trafficking were responsible for roughly half of the 15,828 violent crimes — rapes, robberies, stabbings and assaults — reported in the city during 2015. Austria received 90,000 asylum requests in 2015, the second-highest number in the EU on a per capita basis, but this pales in comparison to what may lie ahead. Interior Minister Wolfgang Sobotka warned last month that up to one million migrants are poised to cross the Mediterranean from Libya to Europe. Left: The area around Praterstern train station in Vienna is overrun by shiftless migrants from Afghanistan and North Africa who are selling drugs, fighting turf battles and assaulting female passersby. Police were dispatched to the area 6,265 times in 2015. Right: The left-leaning magazine Falter was accused of "blanket discrimination" against Muslims, after it ran a cover with a drawing of five "light skinned" European women surrounded by large numbers of "dark skinned" Arab males. The image evoked the mass sexual assaults in Cologne on New Year's Eve. The brutal gang rape of a woman by three Afghan asylum seekers in central Vienna on April 22 has shocked the Austrian public and drawn attention to a spike in migrant-related rapes, sexual assaults and other crimes across the country. The migrant crime wave comes as the anti-immigrant Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) has surged in opinion polls. The party's candidate, Norbert Hofer, won the first round of Austria's presidential elections on April 24, and is on track to win the presidency in the second round, run-off election scheduled for May 22. The three Afghans — two 16-year-olds and one 17-year-old — followed the woman, a 21-year-old exchange student, into a public restroom at the Praterstern train station, one of the main transportation hubs in Vienna. One of the migrants held the woman down while the other two took turns raping her. Continue Reading Article Iran Comes Clean on Banking Problems by Lawrence A. Franklin  •  May 5, 2016 at 4:30 am Central Bank of Iran (CBI) governor Seif Valiollah mentioned that Iran has a reputation for not being exactly transparent on countering financial support for terrorist operations. He further blamed the regime's willingness to facilitate money-laundering schemes as another factor discouraging investment from abroad, and indirectly criticized the overweening influence of the huge business conglomerates run by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) on the Iranian economy. Nasser Hakimi, another CBI official blamed Iran's own banks for access problems with the Society for Worldwide International Transactions (SWIFT) network. Several of Iran's key banks had not yet purchased or installed the required software and financial identifier codes that would enable SWIFT to become operable in Iran. Central Bank of Iran (CBI) officials have admitted that the regime's own financial policies, and not the United States, are responsible for some of the country's banking problems. CBI governor Seif Valiollah admitted recently that Tehran's failure to reap more economic benefits from the JCPOA agreement is, at least in part, Iran's own fault. These revelations by Iran's top banking officials refute charges by Iranian hardliners that the United States has been orchestrating a toteyeh bozoorg ("grand conspiracy") to deny Iran access to international banking networks. CBI officials and others have detailed the shortcomings of Iran's own banking system. These CBI statements challenge the skewed comments in the Iranian press that America's refusal to grant foreign banks access to U.S financial services is what is responsible for Iran's bank problems. Some of the negative commentary came from economists disappointed with President Rouhani's management of the economy. Continue Reading Article Should the U.S. Build an "ISIS Wall"? by Raymond Ibrahim  •  May 5, 2016 at 4:00 am "If you really want to protect Americans from ISIS, you secure the southern border. It's that simple." — Rep. Duncan Hunter. The Department of Homeland Security denied Hunter's claims, called them "categorically false" and added that "no credible intelligence to suggest terrorist organizations are actively plotting to cross the southwest border." Days later, however, it was confirmed that "4 ISIS Terrorists" were arrested crossing the border into Texas. Under Obama's presidency alone, 2.5 million illegals have crossed the border. And those are just the ones we know about. How many of these are ISIS operatives, sympathizers or facilitators? Securing the U.S.-Mexico border — with an electronic fence, which has worked so effectively in Israel — is more urgent than we think. The Israeli-built border fence between Israel and Egypt, completed in December 2013, put a complete stop to illegal infiltration from Egypt into Israel. Before the fence was built, many terrorists, traffickers, and drug smugglers crossed the border each year. (Image source: Idobi/Wikimedia Commons) Of all the reasons a majority of Americans support the plan of businessman and U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump to "build a wall" along the U.S.-Mexico border, perhaps the most critical is to avoid letting terrorists into the country. Drugs enter, the victims of traffickers enter, but the most imminent danger comes from operatives of the Islamic State (ISIS) and like-minded groups that are trying to use this porous border as a way to smuggle weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) into the United States and launch terror attacks that could make 9/11seem like a morning in May. Just last week, "One of the American men accused in Minnesota of trying to join the Islamic State group wanted to open up routes from Syria to the U.S. through Mexico... Guled Ali Omar told the ISIS members about the route so that it could be used to send members to America to carry out terrorist attacks, prosecutors alleged in a document." Continue Reading Article

This years spring collection...

Y

      

The biggest problem is, they Vote!  Lord help us if they breed.

There are no words to add to this!!! But Churchill saw it coming. Read his ending comment. ,,,,,,,, and the very last sentence. Makes you think!

 

     IRAN  1970 
 
 
 
  
  IRAN  2012 
 
 
 
  
  AFGHANISTAN 
 
 
 
  
  EGYPT (Cairo University) 1959 
 
 
 
  
  EGYPT (Cairo University) 2012 
 
 
 
  
  NETHERLANDS (Amsterdam) 1980 
 
 
 
  
  NETHERLANDS (Amsterdam) 2012 
 

  ...And some people still do not see a reason to worry! 

Winston Churchill 1899

 "Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, 

but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. 

No stronger retrograde force exists in the  world."

Even more amazing is that this hasn't been published long before now. 

CHURCHILL ON ISLAM 

Unbelievable, but the speech below was written in 1899. 

(Check Wikipedia - The River War). 

The attached short speech from Winston Churchill, was delivered by him in 1899 when he was a young soldier and journalist. 

It probably sets out the current views of many, but expresses in the wonderful Churchillian turn of phrase and use of the English language, of which he was a past master. 

Sir Winston Churchill was, without doubt, one of the greatest men of the late 19th and 20th centuries. 

He was a brave young soldier, a brilliant journalist, an extraordinary politician and statesman, a great war leader and British Prime Minister, to whom the Western world must be forever in his debt. 

He was a prophet in his own time. 

He died on 24th January 1965, at the grand old age of 90 and, after a lifetime of service to his country, was accorded a State funeral. 

HERE IS THE SPEECH: 

"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. 

The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. 

A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. 

The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

AMERICA HAS LOST A GOOD MAN TONIGHT: CRUZ SUSPENDS CAMPAIGN...

One Citizen Speaking...

---

AMERICA HAS LOST A GOOD MAN TONIGHT: CRUZ SUSPENDS CAMPAIGN Posted: 03 May 2016 06:15 PM PDT It appears that demagoguery and the media have done a number on the only Reaganesque candidate we have had since Ronald Reagan.  Here is the notice from Politico …  Ted Cruz on Tuesday night dropped out of the presidential race, ending one of the best-organized campaigns of 2016 after a series of stinging defeats left Donald Trump as the only candidate capable of clinching the nomination outright.  Cruz had appeared likely to go all the way to the Republican convention, but a string of massive losses in the Northeast, and his subsequent defeat in Indiana, appear to have convinced him there’s no way forward.  “From the beginning I’ve said that I would continue on as long as there was a viable path to victory,” Cruz said, with his wife Heidi by his side. “Tonight I’m sorry to say it appears that path has been foreclosed.” “With a heavy heart but with boundless optimism for the long-term future of our nation, we are suspending our campaign.” Source: Ted Cruz drops out of presidential race - POLITICO But is this the end? Cruz apparently will keep his delegates as did Rubio when he suspended his campaign. Kasich may be preempted from being nominated.  Bottom line … America bought the Obama bullshit and now apparently has bought the Trump bullshit. It remains to be seen if Trump truly becomes the nominee and can beat Hillary Clinton. It is a sad day. -- steve

America's top general resigned and here is why!

What the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Must Tell the Nation By Ray Starmann Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen, in concern for the lives of current and future US military personnel and to honor those  Who have gone before, I must speak to the nation today. I’ve called this press conference to announce that I am resigning as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and I am retiring after 39 years on active duty, which included combat service in Iraq leading the finest Marines in the world. I am resigning as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and retiring from the Marine Corps for the following reasons: For the last seven years during the Obama Administration: I have watched and remained silent as hundreds of senior officers were forced to resign or were forcibly retired because of their disagreements with the current policies wrecking the military. I have watched and remained silent as people who have never served a day in uniform laid siege to the glorious traditions of the US military. I have watched and remained silent as male ROTC cadets paraded in red high heels, male soldiers conducted physical training wearing pregnancy simulators, combat units dealt with breastfeeding and lactation issues in the field and sensitivity training became the standard operating procedure of the US military. I have watched and remained silent as Trans-genders were authorized to serve in the ranks, and three females graduated from  The US Army Ranger School, under what I believe are the most dubious of circumstances. My predecessors in the JCS chose to look the other way, and like Pontius Pilate, wash their hands of these egregious affairs. My predecessors in the JCS were more concerned about their careers than about the welfare of the nation and the troops they  Led every day. Now the final nail in the coffin of the US military has been hammered in. On April 1, 2016, Secretary of Defense Ash Carter,  With the full backing of the President of the United States, authorized the legal inclusion of women in the combat arms branches and special operations units of the United States Armed Forces. In good conscience, I can no longer remain silent. The stakes are too high for this nation and for the women in the US military who, I believe will be greatly harmed by their inclusion in the combat arms and special operations. I can no longer watch the US military be annihilated. While many have chosen to sit on the sidelines, I must step forth and  Report to the nation concerning the mortal danger the US military is in tonight because of its commander in chief, President Barack Obama and his cabinet and advisers. The evidence against women in direct combat from the Center for Military Readiness and the Marine Corps’ 36 million dollar,  9 month study and the performance of women at the Marine Infantry Officers Basic Course is overwhelming. Yet, the President, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Army refuse to acknowledge that the evidence even exists. It does exist and it indicates that while women perform spectacularly in 80% of the jobs in the military, the combat arms and special operations should be closed to them; permanently. Women are simply prone to more injuries than men, have less muscle mass, do not have the upper body strength, the same aerobic lung capacity and the aggressiveness to fulfill the military’s combat readiness requirements and missions. The so-called experts often say that women have already served in combat. In the last two conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, females did engage the enemy and many performed heroically and beyond the call of duty. But, returning fire during a military police security operation is not the same as being in a combat arms unit that has the mission of finding, fixing and killing the enemy. That is like comparing Pop Warner Football with the NFL. Reality says that women serving in the combat arms and special operations is not just a bad idea, but a horrific decision that puts this nation in mortal danger. The President and the Secretary of Defense are not dealing with reality, but with a feminist based fantasy based on false premises of gender neutrality. They see the world the way they want it to be, not the way it is. These policies are based on the illusion that genders are neutral and that none of this will affect the military’s readiness, esprit de corps and ability to wage and win wars. There is no gender neutrality on a battlefield. It is the responsibility of America’s military leaders to protect the nation and to obey the lawful orders of those appointed above us. But, our military leaders are not martinets. There is no Fuehrerprinzip in America. An order is not just an order. The  nation’s military leaders have a moral duty to inform our elected officials when policies they support and implement are destructive to the nation itself. Silence is not golden. It is pure and unadulterated moral cowardice. Congress also has a duty to protect the nation and to insure that the military is strong and readiness is maintained. On the issue of women in combat, Congress has been full of sound and fury, while signifying nothing. Except for a few concerned veterans like Senator John McCain and Congressman Duncan Hunter, Congress has remained silent because a majority of Congress has never served and is largely ignorant of the issue itself. I cannot in good conscience promote policies that will order American women, ages 18 – 26 to register and be eligible for a military draft which could place them in combat arms units in wartime. I cannot in good conscience serve as the highest ranking military member of the US military, when I am completely at odds with the social engineering directives emanating from the Secretary of Defense and the President. The military has one sole mission. That is to wage war and to vanquish the enemies of this nation on land, on the seas and in the air. It must never be used as a social engineering project by naïve and uninformed politicians and lobbyists. As the military prepares for this cataclysmic change, the enemies of this nation are lining up against us. They know that this is a lose, lose situation for us and a win, win situation for them. They know that we are now going to wage war with a much weaker force and that our readiness is withering by the hour. It is very possible that the United States of America may never win another war. I do not believe this is hyperbole. I believe this  is a fact. The fate of the republic hangs in mortal jeopardy. I pray that my successor and a new President elected in 2016 have the  courage and the wisdom to amend the policies that might very well destroy this great nation I have served for nearly four  decades. I bid you farewell. Semper Fi.

 

Australian Perspective

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BUT THEY ARE COMING ANYWAY!!!!!!