CAN YOU TRUST A CIA DIRECTOR WHO APPEARS TO BE AN ISLAMICIST...

One Citizen Speaking...

---

CAN YOU TRUST A CIA DIRECTOR WHO APPEARS TO BE AN ISLAMICIST? Posted: 01 May 2016 08:29 PM PDT President Barack Hussein Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry, and CIA Director John Brennan all have one thing in common: they tout Islam as the religion of peace in the face of clear, incontrovertible, and undeniable evidence that Islam is an intolerant war-like religion based on spreading its message through force, coercion, or bribery throughout the world. This worldview helps to explain why our foreign policy supports the Muslim Brotherhood and provides material aid and comfort to those said to be terrorists, all the while disparaging and disadvantaging Israel. So can you believe the CIA director when he claims that releasing the 28-pages of classified information from the 9/11 report would be a mistake? CIA director: '28 pages' contain inaccurate information CIA Director John Brennan said Sunday that releasing the 28 classified pages from the 9/11Commission report would be a mistake because they contain inaccurate, un-vetted information that could be used to tie Saudi Arabia to the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.  "This chapter was kept out because of concerns about sensitive methods, investigative actions, and the investigation of 9/11 was still underway in 2002," Brennan said on NBC's "Meet the Press." "I think there's a combination of things that are accurate and inaccurate [in the report]," Brennan said. "I think the 9/11 Commission took that joint inquiry and those 28 pages or so and followed through on the investigation and then came out with a very clear judgment that there was no evidence that ... Saudi government as an institution or Saudi officials or individuals had provided financial support to al Qaeda." Former and current congressmen argue the pages show the existence of a Saudi support network for the hijackers involved in the terror attacks. The 28 pages were cut from a report on the 9/11 terror attacks in 2003 by the George W. Bush administration in the interest of national security. Former Sen. Bob Graham (D-Fla.), who helped author the report, says he believes it shows the 9/11 hijackers were "substantially" supported by the Saudi government, as well as charities and wealthy people in that country. "I think it is implausible to believe that 19 people, most of whom didn't speak English, most of whom had never been in the United States before, many of whom didn't have a high school education — could've carried out such a complicated task without some support from within the United States," Graham said in an interview with "60 Minutes" in April. In response to that legislation [to release the 28-page], which President Obama has lobbied against, the Saudi government threatened to sell off hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of American assets. Read more at: CIA director: '28 pages' contain inaccurate information | TheHill And, it was not only the Obama Administration that withheld this information. The Bush Administration not only withheld the 28-pages, but appeared to assist Saudi assets, including members of bin Laden’s family, in leaving the country after the attack – without being interviewed by the FBI about any possible role in the terrorist attack. Understandable because of the Bushes friendliness and  business ties with Saudi Arabia. And not to forget Bush (41) also served as the CIA Director. Bin Laden Family Evacuated Two dozen members of Osama bin Laden's family were urgently evacuated from the United States in the first days following the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, according to the Saudi ambassador to Washington. Most of bin Laden's relatives were attending high school and college. The young members of the bin Laden family were driven or flown under FBI supervision to a secret place in Texas and then to Washington, The Times reported Sunday. They left the country on a private charter plane when airports reopened three days after the attacks. King Fahd, the ailing Saudi ruler, sent an urgent message to his embassy in Washington pointing out that there were "bin Laden children all over America" and ordered, "Take measures to protect the innocents," the ambassador said. <Source: CBS News> So can we believe CIA Director John Brennan who served as the CIA Station Chief in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia? Former Congressman and military man, Colonel Alan West,  observes… That speech the CIA director gave in Arabic on the beauty of Islam In 2010, John Brennan, the current Director of the CIA, gave a speech extolling the beauty of Islam. I hope you’ll watch this three-minute clip. I’m not interested in contradicting Brennan’s opinion of the glorious aspects of Islam, or commenting on the fact he spoke fluent Arabic, and hoped “Insha’Allah” to study it again one day. What concerns me most about this speech is that a senior member of our National Security team, and now currently the CIA director, referred to the capital of Israel in the first instance not as Jerusalem — but as Al Quds. That is a blatant slap and disrespect to our ally in the Middle East, the State of Israel. If that is the sentiment within the Obama administration, then it more than explains why current Secretary of State John Kerry is negotiating a ceasefire on behalf of an Islamic terrorist organization. What I did find odd was that Mr. Brennan never made any references to the history of continuous violence in Islam since 622 AD — the time of Mohammed’s Hijra from Mecca to Medina. And I guess those ISIS fellas are simply celebrating Islam’s beauty by threatening others to become a part of it, or be killed. <Source> Bottom line … Release the documents. Empanel another 9/11 commission. And, resolve the discrepancies – along with a list of those who suppressed, altered, or classified information for political or ideological gain.  Something stinks. And, I believe it is the Saudis who have funded an international system of Mosques, many of which are said to preach jihad, to spread the Saudi’s virulent strain of Whabbism around the globe.  Don’t let anyone tell you different. ISIS is practicing fundamentalist Islam as it is taught by the Whabbists. And, I would suspect that the Saudis have made a Faustian deal the terrorists; don’t attack or destabilize the Kingdom and the ruling family in return for funding and operational support. We are so screwed when it appears our enemies have infiltrated our government at the very highest levels; infecting our institutions and bureaucracy to carry out an anti-America, anti-Jew agenda long after the leadership has left power. -- steve

ARE YOU GOING TO DONATE TO L. BRENT BOZO AND THE MRC? Posted: 04 May 2016 01:01 PM PDT The day after Ted Cruz suspended his campaign in the face of a massive media campaign by Fox and others, I do not think I am in the mood to donate to a media watchdog that was blind to the all-Trump, all-the-time super-PAC known as Fox … [my comments in bracketed blue italics[ Dear Patriot,  Let's be clear: the Media Research Center is non-partisan and we take no sides in this election or any other. But we do and will hold the media accountable when they try to get their favorite candidates elected. [It appears to me that you started with a BIG lie. If you actually held the media accountable when they try to get their favorite candidates elected, you would have been all over Fox for their all-Trump, all-the-time coverage that decimated the Cruz campaign and repeated some of the most scurrilous lies put forth by Trump in the form of “someone told me” and “look at that” – especially the crap put forth by the National Enquirer with little or no basis in fact. As for that non-partisan assertion, why is this headline addressed “Dear Patriot?” Do you have another series addressed “Dear Communist?”] As clear as day, the leftist media are taking sides right now. Self-appointed news media, such as George Stephanopoulos, Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddow, and many others, are "in bed" with the administration, and exposing this love affair is going to change the landscape of this election.   [Non-partisan? Hold the media accountable? What about Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, Megyn Kelly, and Greta van Susteren at Fox who are not only “in bed” with the administration, but have changed the landscape of this nation when they destroyed the Cruz candidacy?] Take a look at MRC's EXCLUSIVE cartoon that depicts the media's love affair with the Left! <link redacted>  Some of the most horrific examples of the media's love affair with the Left is in their loyalty to Hillary Clinton: covering up the Benghazi disaster, manipulating the coverage of the email server scandal, and downplayingthe contributions made to the Clinton Foundation.  [One might want to take a closer look at Fox and the horrific examples of not being “fair and balanced” and manipulating the audience with their “we report, you decide” – but never mentioning they pick what they report, so you can decide from their choices.] Truthfully, I don't want MSNBC or CNN or the New York Times to elect the next President. I want the American public, fully informed with the truth, to do it. Don't you? Click here if you can help the MRC bring truth to media coverage this election season. <link redacted>  [Likewise, I do not want Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes and Fox to elect the next President – but that appears to be what is happening.] it [sic] is clear that for conservative ideas to get a fair hearing this year, we must be able to go head-to-head against the liberal media... expose their socialist bias... and neutralize their efforts to elect the most left wing candidate possible.  [“conservative ideas?” Yeah, that’s non-partisan. Yeah right!] To expose this leftist juggernaut in 2016, I will need you like never before.The MRC is the only group in America that can stop the propaganda arm of the Left: the liberal media. [Do you even know the meaning of “non-partisan?”And who is going to stop the propaganda arm of the Establishment like Fox News?] The leftist press will succeed in stealing the elections through deceit and character assassination - unless we conservatives take decisive action right now. This is why our $25,000 goal to prepare for the 2016 national conventions are so vital... so important.  [“Deceit and character assassination?” You could be speaking about the Trump campaign. And, spare me the bullshit about “we conservatives.” Those that claimed they were conservatives, turned tail and ran when faced with a constitutional conservative candidate in Ted Cruz. Not the conservatives on the ground, but most of the professed conservatives in the media. Where are the tough guys like Mark Levin who told you where he stood, how he arrived at his decision, and explained why it was important for a conservative to be elected. As for $25,000 why not ask Fox to chip in since you seem to spend some amount of time on their so-called network? It’s chump change for them.]  I believe our "Tell the Truth!" 2016 campaign will be the most important endeavor we have ever undertaken at the MRC. It will have a potentially historic impact on the future of our country. You and I must commit ourselves to this fight like never before - starting right now - if freedom is to have a future in America.  [This reminds me of Jack Nicholson’s line in A Few Good Men. “You can’t handle the truth!” The establishment GOP and Fox appear to have impacted both freedom and our fight for the nation. Unless something unforeseen happens at the GOP convention, we are screwed and you are still staying silent about those who helped the left achieve their agenda.] Sincerely,  L. Brent Bozell Founder and President  Media Research Center  P.S.: No one else is doing what we do to neutralize the Left's most powerful asset - the news media - in their plan to win another term and radically transform America. But we need our guerrilla marketing campaign fully funded and fully operational this month to have any chance of leveling the playing field for all candidates. Help us raise the $25,000 we need to wage this war when our country need it most. <link redacted> [And what conservative group is calling out Fox for their unfair and unbalanced coverage. It is amazing when CNN had fairer (even given the leftward bias) coverage of the candidates.] Bottom line … Discouraged, but not despondent. The conservatives will re-group and fight another day. It appears that we need to concentrate on holding a voting majority in the House and and getting a conservative voting majority in the Senate to protect the nation against what may be coming. Remember, with a strong Senate (and without progressives like Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and the other gutless RINOs) no liberal Supreme Court nominee can be confirmed.  We are so screwed. -- steve

In this mailing: Soeren Kern: Migrant Rape Epidemic Reaches Austria Lawrence A. Franklin: Iran Comes Clean on Banking Problems Raymond Ibrahim: Should the U.S. Build an "ISIS Wall"? Migrant Rape Epidemic Reaches Austria by Soeren Kern  •  May 5, 2016 at 5:00 am A 20-year-old asylum seeker from Iraq confessed to raping a 10-year-old boy at a public swimming pool in Vienna. The Iraqi said the rape was a "sexual emergency" resulting from "excess sexual energy." Those who dare to link spiraling crime to Muslim mass migration are being silenced by the guardians of Austrian multiculturalism. According to data compiled by the Austrian Interior Ministry, nearly one out of three asylum seekers in Vienna was accused of committing crimes in 2015. North African gangs fighting for control over drug trafficking were responsible for roughly half of the 15,828 violent crimes — rapes, robberies, stabbings and assaults — reported in the city during 2015. Austria received 90,000 asylum requests in 2015, the second-highest number in the EU on a per capita basis, but this pales in comparison to what may lie ahead. Interior Minister Wolfgang Sobotka warned last month that up to one million migrants are poised to cross the Mediterranean from Libya to Europe. Left: The area around Praterstern train station in Vienna is overrun by shiftless migrants from Afghanistan and North Africa who are selling drugs, fighting turf battles and assaulting female passersby. Police were dispatched to the area 6,265 times in 2015. Right: The left-leaning magazine Falter was accused of "blanket discrimination" against Muslims, after it ran a cover with a drawing of five "light skinned" European women surrounded by large numbers of "dark skinned" Arab males. The image evoked the mass sexual assaults in Cologne on New Year's Eve. The brutal gang rape of a woman by three Afghan asylum seekers in central Vienna on April 22 has shocked the Austrian public and drawn attention to a spike in migrant-related rapes, sexual assaults and other crimes across the country. The migrant crime wave comes as the anti-immigrant Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) has surged in opinion polls. The party's candidate, Norbert Hofer, won the first round of Austria's presidential elections on April 24, and is on track to win the presidency in the second round, run-off election scheduled for May 22. The three Afghans — two 16-year-olds and one 17-year-old — followed the woman, a 21-year-old exchange student, into a public restroom at the Praterstern train station, one of the main transportation hubs in Vienna. One of the migrants held the woman down while the other two took turns raping her. Continue Reading Article Iran Comes Clean on Banking Problems by Lawrence A. Franklin  •  May 5, 2016 at 4:30 am Central Bank of Iran (CBI) governor Seif Valiollah mentioned that Iran has a reputation for not being exactly transparent on countering financial support for terrorist operations. He further blamed the regime's willingness to facilitate money-laundering schemes as another factor discouraging investment from abroad, and indirectly criticized the overweening influence of the huge business conglomerates run by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) on the Iranian economy. Nasser Hakimi, another CBI official blamed Iran's own banks for access problems with the Society for Worldwide International Transactions (SWIFT) network. Several of Iran's key banks had not yet purchased or installed the required software and financial identifier codes that would enable SWIFT to become operable in Iran. Central Bank of Iran (CBI) officials have admitted that the regime's own financial policies, and not the United States, are responsible for some of the country's banking problems. CBI governor Seif Valiollah admitted recently that Tehran's failure to reap more economic benefits from the JCPOA agreement is, at least in part, Iran's own fault. These revelations by Iran's top banking officials refute charges by Iranian hardliners that the United States has been orchestrating a toteyeh bozoorg ("grand conspiracy") to deny Iran access to international banking networks. CBI officials and others have detailed the shortcomings of Iran's own banking system. These CBI statements challenge the skewed comments in the Iranian press that America's refusal to grant foreign banks access to U.S financial services is what is responsible for Iran's bank problems. Some of the negative commentary came from economists disappointed with President Rouhani's management of the economy. Continue Reading Article Should the U.S. Build an "ISIS Wall"? by Raymond Ibrahim  •  May 5, 2016 at 4:00 am "If you really want to protect Americans from ISIS, you secure the southern border. It's that simple." — Rep. Duncan Hunter. The Department of Homeland Security denied Hunter's claims, called them "categorically false" and added that "no credible intelligence to suggest terrorist organizations are actively plotting to cross the southwest border." Days later, however, it was confirmed that "4 ISIS Terrorists" were arrested crossing the border into Texas. Under Obama's presidency alone, 2.5 million illegals have crossed the border. And those are just the ones we know about. How many of these are ISIS operatives, sympathizers or facilitators? Securing the U.S.-Mexico border — with an electronic fence, which has worked so effectively in Israel — is more urgent than we think. The Israeli-built border fence between Israel and Egypt, completed in December 2013, put a complete stop to illegal infiltration from Egypt into Israel. Before the fence was built, many terrorists, traffickers, and drug smugglers crossed the border each year. (Image source: Idobi/Wikimedia Commons) Of all the reasons a majority of Americans support the plan of businessman and U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump to "build a wall" along the U.S.-Mexico border, perhaps the most critical is to avoid letting terrorists into the country. Drugs enter, the victims of traffickers enter, but the most imminent danger comes from operatives of the Islamic State (ISIS) and like-minded groups that are trying to use this porous border as a way to smuggle weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) into the United States and launch terror attacks that could make 9/11seem like a morning in May. Just last week, "One of the American men accused in Minnesota of trying to join the Islamic State group wanted to open up routes from Syria to the U.S. through Mexico... Guled Ali Omar told the ISIS members about the route so that it could be used to send members to America to carry out terrorist attacks, prosecutors alleged in a document." Continue Reading Article

This years spring collection...

Y

      

The biggest problem is, they Vote!  Lord help us if they breed.

There are no words to add to this!!! But Churchill saw it coming. Read his ending comment. ,,,,,,,, and the very last sentence. Makes you think!

 

     IRAN  1970 
 
 
 
  
  IRAN  2012 
 
 
 
  
  AFGHANISTAN 
 
 
 
  
  EGYPT (Cairo University) 1959 
 
 
 
  
  EGYPT (Cairo University) 2012 
 
 
 
  
  NETHERLANDS (Amsterdam) 1980 
 
 
 
  
  NETHERLANDS (Amsterdam) 2012 
 

  ...And some people still do not see a reason to worry! 

Winston Churchill 1899

 "Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, 

but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. 

No stronger retrograde force exists in the  world."

Even more amazing is that this hasn't been published long before now. 

CHURCHILL ON ISLAM 

Unbelievable, but the speech below was written in 1899. 

(Check Wikipedia - The River War). 

The attached short speech from Winston Churchill, was delivered by him in 1899 when he was a young soldier and journalist. 

It probably sets out the current views of many, but expresses in the wonderful Churchillian turn of phrase and use of the English language, of which he was a past master. 

Sir Winston Churchill was, without doubt, one of the greatest men of the late 19th and 20th centuries. 

He was a brave young soldier, a brilliant journalist, an extraordinary politician and statesman, a great war leader and British Prime Minister, to whom the Western world must be forever in his debt. 

He was a prophet in his own time. 

He died on 24th January 1965, at the grand old age of 90 and, after a lifetime of service to his country, was accorded a State funeral. 

HERE IS THE SPEECH: 

"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. 

The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. 

A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. 

The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

AMERICA HAS LOST A GOOD MAN TONIGHT: CRUZ SUSPENDS CAMPAIGN...

One Citizen Speaking...

---

AMERICA HAS LOST A GOOD MAN TONIGHT: CRUZ SUSPENDS CAMPAIGN Posted: 03 May 2016 06:15 PM PDT It appears that demagoguery and the media have done a number on the only Reaganesque candidate we have had since Ronald Reagan.  Here is the notice from Politico …  Ted Cruz on Tuesday night dropped out of the presidential race, ending one of the best-organized campaigns of 2016 after a series of stinging defeats left Donald Trump as the only candidate capable of clinching the nomination outright.  Cruz had appeared likely to go all the way to the Republican convention, but a string of massive losses in the Northeast, and his subsequent defeat in Indiana, appear to have convinced him there’s no way forward.  “From the beginning I’ve said that I would continue on as long as there was a viable path to victory,” Cruz said, with his wife Heidi by his side. “Tonight I’m sorry to say it appears that path has been foreclosed.” “With a heavy heart but with boundless optimism for the long-term future of our nation, we are suspending our campaign.” Source: Ted Cruz drops out of presidential race - POLITICO But is this the end? Cruz apparently will keep his delegates as did Rubio when he suspended his campaign. Kasich may be preempted from being nominated.  Bottom line … America bought the Obama bullshit and now apparently has bought the Trump bullshit. It remains to be seen if Trump truly becomes the nominee and can beat Hillary Clinton. It is a sad day. -- steve

America's top general resigned and here is why!

What the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Must Tell the Nation By Ray Starmann Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen, in concern for the lives of current and future US military personnel and to honor those  Who have gone before, I must speak to the nation today. I’ve called this press conference to announce that I am resigning as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and I am retiring after 39 years on active duty, which included combat service in Iraq leading the finest Marines in the world. I am resigning as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and retiring from the Marine Corps for the following reasons: For the last seven years during the Obama Administration: I have watched and remained silent as hundreds of senior officers were forced to resign or were forcibly retired because of their disagreements with the current policies wrecking the military. I have watched and remained silent as people who have never served a day in uniform laid siege to the glorious traditions of the US military. I have watched and remained silent as male ROTC cadets paraded in red high heels, male soldiers conducted physical training wearing pregnancy simulators, combat units dealt with breastfeeding and lactation issues in the field and sensitivity training became the standard operating procedure of the US military. I have watched and remained silent as Trans-genders were authorized to serve in the ranks, and three females graduated from  The US Army Ranger School, under what I believe are the most dubious of circumstances. My predecessors in the JCS chose to look the other way, and like Pontius Pilate, wash their hands of these egregious affairs. My predecessors in the JCS were more concerned about their careers than about the welfare of the nation and the troops they  Led every day. Now the final nail in the coffin of the US military has been hammered in. On April 1, 2016, Secretary of Defense Ash Carter,  With the full backing of the President of the United States, authorized the legal inclusion of women in the combat arms branches and special operations units of the United States Armed Forces. In good conscience, I can no longer remain silent. The stakes are too high for this nation and for the women in the US military who, I believe will be greatly harmed by their inclusion in the combat arms and special operations. I can no longer watch the US military be annihilated. While many have chosen to sit on the sidelines, I must step forth and  Report to the nation concerning the mortal danger the US military is in tonight because of its commander in chief, President Barack Obama and his cabinet and advisers. The evidence against women in direct combat from the Center for Military Readiness and the Marine Corps’ 36 million dollar,  9 month study and the performance of women at the Marine Infantry Officers Basic Course is overwhelming. Yet, the President, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Army refuse to acknowledge that the evidence even exists. It does exist and it indicates that while women perform spectacularly in 80% of the jobs in the military, the combat arms and special operations should be closed to them; permanently. Women are simply prone to more injuries than men, have less muscle mass, do not have the upper body strength, the same aerobic lung capacity and the aggressiveness to fulfill the military’s combat readiness requirements and missions. The so-called experts often say that women have already served in combat. In the last two conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, females did engage the enemy and many performed heroically and beyond the call of duty. But, returning fire during a military police security operation is not the same as being in a combat arms unit that has the mission of finding, fixing and killing the enemy. That is like comparing Pop Warner Football with the NFL. Reality says that women serving in the combat arms and special operations is not just a bad idea, but a horrific decision that puts this nation in mortal danger. The President and the Secretary of Defense are not dealing with reality, but with a feminist based fantasy based on false premises of gender neutrality. They see the world the way they want it to be, not the way it is. These policies are based on the illusion that genders are neutral and that none of this will affect the military’s readiness, esprit de corps and ability to wage and win wars. There is no gender neutrality on a battlefield. It is the responsibility of America’s military leaders to protect the nation and to obey the lawful orders of those appointed above us. But, our military leaders are not martinets. There is no Fuehrerprinzip in America. An order is not just an order. The  nation’s military leaders have a moral duty to inform our elected officials when policies they support and implement are destructive to the nation itself. Silence is not golden. It is pure and unadulterated moral cowardice. Congress also has a duty to protect the nation and to insure that the military is strong and readiness is maintained. On the issue of women in combat, Congress has been full of sound and fury, while signifying nothing. Except for a few concerned veterans like Senator John McCain and Congressman Duncan Hunter, Congress has remained silent because a majority of Congress has never served and is largely ignorant of the issue itself. I cannot in good conscience promote policies that will order American women, ages 18 – 26 to register and be eligible for a military draft which could place them in combat arms units in wartime. I cannot in good conscience serve as the highest ranking military member of the US military, when I am completely at odds with the social engineering directives emanating from the Secretary of Defense and the President. The military has one sole mission. That is to wage war and to vanquish the enemies of this nation on land, on the seas and in the air. It must never be used as a social engineering project by naïve and uninformed politicians and lobbyists. As the military prepares for this cataclysmic change, the enemies of this nation are lining up against us. They know that this is a lose, lose situation for us and a win, win situation for them. They know that we are now going to wage war with a much weaker force and that our readiness is withering by the hour. It is very possible that the United States of America may never win another war. I do not believe this is hyperbole. I believe this  is a fact. The fate of the republic hangs in mortal jeopardy. I pray that my successor and a new President elected in 2016 have the  courage and the wisdom to amend the policies that might very well destroy this great nation I have served for nearly four  decades. I bid you farewell. Semper Fi.