UK: A Tale of Two Inquiries by Douglas Murray  •  August 5, 2016 at 11:00 am Now someone has "leaked" the full Royall report, which shows that students at the Oxford University Labour club who were Jewish were subjected to frequent anti-Semitism. And this makes clear that the Labour party clearly attempted to cover-up the negative findings of an inquiry that they themselves had commissioned. In an interview aired July 20, Shami Chakrabarti was specifically asked about whether she had been offered a seat in the House of Lords (peerage) before writing her report. She looked unusually uncomfortable and shuffled around before saying, "I don't think I want to talk about my future ambitions at this point." This week, it was announced that the one person put forward for a peerage by the Labour party in the latest honours list is... Shami Chakrabarti. A party that tries to silence those who identify anti-Semitism, and rewards those who cover it up, is a party where moral as well as political corruption is not an aberration, but systemic. Shami Chakrabarti, who wrote a report last month whitewashing the problem of anti-Semitism in the UK Labour party, was this week put forward by the Labour party for a seat in the House of Lords (a peerage). (Image source: Southbank Centre/Flickr) During the course of a hot summer Britain's Labour party is in meltdown on a range of issues. But among the worst parts of its meltdown are those to do with its continuing effort to cover up the party's serious anti-Semitism problem. As we have pointed out here before, the party's leader -- Jeremy Corbyn -- has such a long history of association and sympathy with some of the world's most extreme anti-Semites that it is hard to see how the party's problems could not trickle down as well as up. Now two developments suggest that the Labour body politic has become so wracked by this problem that it is unlikely to recover. Continue Reading Article

An Open Letter to Khizr Khan from U. S marine and navy veteran + Background...

 

An Open Letter to Khizr Khan

 

Dear Mr. Khan,

I want to preface this letter by stating that I respect your son’s sacrifice for this great nation.  By all accounts, he is a true hero that sacrificed himself in service to our country. For that I am thankful.

As a veteran, I watched your comments at the Democratic National Convention with a mixture of sadness, and anger.  The United States has a military comprised of volunteers.  Every single member has made the conscious choice to join the military and serve.  There is not a single service member who has been forced into service.  It is important for all service members (and apparently, their families) to understand that service to this great nation does not imbue one with special privileges or rights.  I found your comments troubling when you said: “Have you ever been to Arlington cemetery? Go look at the graves of brave patriots who died defending the United States of America . You will see all faiths, genders and ethnicities. You have sacrificed nothing and no one.”

Does it matter whether Mr. Trump has sacrificed “…nothing and no one?”…has Ms. Clinton “..sacrificed” for this nation?  How about Mr. Obama?   Your comment stating that Mr. Trump “…has sacrifice no one” is alarming.  Are you intimating that YOU sacrificed?  Sir, your son willingly sacrificed himself.   As a father I cannot imagine the pain you must feel but his sacrifice is his own.  He was not forced to serve.

I am troubled that you would allow a party that has little more than contempt for the US Service Member to parade you into the DNC to denounce Donald Trump.  Did you watch when protesters at the DNC booed and heckled Medal of Honor recipient  Capt. Florent Groberg? Did you notice your party interrupting the moment of silence for slain police officers?  Your own hypocrisy in not denouncing these acts and instead using the DNC as a platform to make a political point is disgraceful.  The simple fact is that whether one served or sacrificed does not give greater power to their statements.  One vote is as valuable as another.  That sir, is why our Country is great.  Your condemnation of one person for a statement while standing idly as your party disparages veterans and police officers is the height of hypocrisy.

To conflate the need to prevent potential terrorists from entering our country with the belief that ‘all Muslims’ should be banned is simply wrong and disingenuous. As a reminder, Mr. Trump said: ” “Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in Jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life,”The irony of your son’s own death at the hands of these very people in Iraq should not be ignored.  I have little doubt that your son would have recognized the need to protect our country from these very people.  In fact, he held is own troops back so that he could check on a suspicious car.  Your son understood sacrifice and how to protect “his people”…’his soldiers’….’his fellow Americans’…

As you continue to make the media circuit and bask in the glow of affection cast upon you by a party that has little regard for your son’s own sacrifice, and veterans in general, I would ask you to consider your comments and your position more closely.

Respectfully,

Chris Mark

US Marine and Navy Veteran.

Also………………..

> 

> Here's' some more facts about the Muslim father who complained about Trump:

> 

> The law firm Kahn worked for is also the law firm for the royal court of Saudi Arabia and the tax lawyers for the Clintons and for the Clinton Foundation and is also the firm Loretta Lynch work for. They also represent a small Tech firm in Denver Colorado which so happens to be the same Tech firm that managed Hillary's private server. Coincidence?

Excerpt From The New York Post Morning Report Clint Eastwood is tired of America being overly sensitive...

“[Donald Trump’s] onto something,” he said in the September issue of Esquire, “Because secretly everybody’s getting tired of political correctness, kissing up. That’s the kiss-ass generation we’re in right now. We’re really in a p—y generation. Everybody’s walking on eggshells. We see people accusing people of being racist and all kinds of stuff. When I grew up, those things weren’t called racist.”

The 86-year-old actor/director went on to explain that the “p—y generation” is all the people who say, “Oh, you can’t do that, and you can’t do this, and you can’t say that.”

He added, “I guess it’s just the times.”

Modal Trigger

Photo: Terry Richardson

Though Eastwood hasn’t endorsed anyone for president, he revealed that he will probably vote for Trump because he feels Hillary Clinton is following in President Obama’s footsteps. Although, he does say Trump has “said a lot of dumb things.”

“So have all of them. Both sides. But everybody — the press and everybody’s going, ‘Oh, well, that’s racist,’ and they’re making a big hoodoo out of it. Just f–king get over it. It’s a sad time in history.”

As far as change, the “Sully” director says he wants everyone to get to work and be more understanding.

“Kick ass and take names. And this may be my dad talking, but don’t spend what you don’t have. That’s why we’re in the position we are in right now.”

Filed under 2016 presidential election ,  clint eastwood ,  donald trump , esquire ,  politics

Best Bathroom Signs ever ... However they won't work in Obambo's world!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AND FINALLY THE ONE THE LADIES LIKE THE BEST

 

 

 

 

 

=

 

  

---

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.  www.avast.com

=

The truth will set you free! Don't believe the Libtardian bullshit about Trump!

Krauthammer: Iran Payment Wasn't Just Ransom, It Was Money Laundering !

 share this

 email

As seen on Special Report with Bret Baier 

---

Benghazi Hero: Iran 'Ransom' Sets Bad Precedent, Endangers Americans

'It Just Plain Stinks': Peters Blasts Obama Admin for $400M Iran Payment

---

Charles Krauthammer reacted to a new Wall Street Journal report that the Justice Department objected to the Obama Administration sending $400 million in non-U.S. currency just hours before Iran released four imprisoned Americans. The DOJ was overruled by the State Department, according to the report.

Krauthammer said "of course the Justice Department objected; it was illegal."

He said that not only was the payment bad optics and a quid pro quo for the release of the Americans, but it skirted statute against dealing with Iran in U.S. dollars.

"They had to print the money here, ship it over to Switzerland, turn it into Swiss francs and Euros and ship it over to Iran," he said.

"If a private company had done this, this is called money laundering. The CEO would be in jail right now."

---

Kirby Defends $400M Iran Payout: 'This Was Not Ransom'

NSA Whistleblower: Agency Has Hillary's Deleted Emails

Gingrich: Obama's 'Despicable' Comments About Trump Undermined America

---

She certainly knows how to relate to "middle America"... Hillary and Armani

 

Hillary and Armani

                

I'm not sending this to blast Hillary for giving a speech about inequality

while wearing a $12,500 Armani jacket.

I'm posting this to give congrats to Armani for being

able to sell a potato sack with sleeves for $12,500,

which, in this case, holds about 180 pounds of bullshit.