Tuesday, October 25, 2016

October 25, 2016 Clinton Aide in New WikiLeaks Email: 'We Need to Clean This Up. He Has Emails from Her'

Clinton Aide in New WikiLeaks Email: 'We Need to Clean This Up. He Has Emails from Her' 

There are fresh revelations this morning after WikiLeaks released a new batch of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta's hacked emails.

An email from 2015 shows Hillary Clinton's top aide and lawyer Cheryl Mills writing to Podesta, "we need to clean this up," an apparent reference to communications between President Obama and Hillary Clinton in which she had used her private email server. 

"He has emails from her - they do not say state.gov," Mills continued.

Russia Taunts England And Europe By Unveiling It’s ‘Satan 2’ Nuclear-Capable RS-28 Sarmat Missile


A handful of you may like these. I did.....They are just jokes? Uhh….no….they are not!

 


 

 

13230208_10153613893222596_3116203058345989395_n
 
13244661_10153627870167596_1966492558170989821_n
 
13260224_10153618731057596_2798488598867178848_n
 
13266059_10153615998577596_7489078913434820304_n
 
 
13241343_10153620673562596_3157093122238854866_n
 
13335792_10153648499462596_9117297605401599217_n
 
13327566_10153640527397596_8374134215182994178_n
 
13322163_10153642454162596_4009293226299474742_n
 
 
13346882_10153644439162596_8765501699535440302_n
 
 
13412926_10153653144222596_1911506842818596702_n
 
13336089_10153646521442596_6718351919060759451_n
 
13413788_10157129108815389_2848300897998613353_n
 
13315757_10153634944227596_1253141833983565499_n
 
13322046_10153645957342596_7106575527145495928_n
 
13346402_10153641271262596_2305110095282708020_n
 
13322068_10153636886812596_6129338833749018651_n
 

 

13254574_10153630858362596_5516595644835519064_n

 


Monday, October 24, 2016

Obama held all of this until his term was almost over. The fee also for Medicare goes up something close to $237 a month per person starting next year.

FYI

For some of you, this will not affect you immediately, but for some of us, we are already at this age and can really be in for some rough times.

The Liberal/Democrats in action. 

 

IMPORTANT ACTION INFORMATION FOR NOVEMBER, 2016, VOTE Medicare  at  age 76!

 

If you don't read this, and do nothing about it, don't complain when it affects you or your loved ones!  This is the second Judge to have read the Obama Care document comments.  More highlights of Nancy's "pass it and then find out what's in the bill"!  Show this to everyone nearing the ripe old age of 76.  These are just a few of the things that we seniors are going to have to deal with which started in 2014. 

 

Even far left Democrats will not like these.

 

MEDICARE AT AGE 76, IMPORTANT PLEASE READ - ANYONE WHO DOUBTS THIS IS TRUE CAN DOWNLOAD THE NEW OBAMACARE AND LOOK UP THE PAGES MENTIONED.  THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING.... 

 

THIS should be read by everyone, especially important to those over 75....... If you are younger, then it may apply to your parents.  Your hospital Medicare admittance has just changed under ObamaCare.

 

You must be admitted by your primary Physician in order for Medicare to pay for it!  If you are admitted by an emergency room doctor, it is treated as outpatient care where hospital costs are not covered.  This is only the tip of the iceberg for Obama Care. 

 

Just wait to see what else went into effect in 2014. YOU ARE NOT GOING TO LIKE THIS... At age 76, when you most need it most, you are NOT eligible for cancer treatment...

 

* see page 272.  What Nancy Pelosi didn't want us to know until after the healthcare bill was passed.  Remember, she said, "We have to pass the Bill so that we can see what's in it." 

 

Well, here it is.

 

Obama Care Highlighted by Page Number THE CARE BILL HB 3200 JUDGE KITHIL IS THE 2ND OFFICIAL WHO HAS OUTLINED THESE PARTS OF THE CARE BILL.

 

Judge KITHIL of Marble Falls, TX highlighted the most egregious pages of HB3200.  Please read this...... especially the reference to pages 58 & 59.  JUDGE KITHIL wrote:

 

Page 50/section 152:  The bill will provide insurance to all non-U.S. residents, even if they are here illegally.

 

Page 58 and 59:  The government will have real-time access to an individual's bank account and will have the authority to make electronic fund transfers from those accounts.

 

Page 65/section 164:  The plan will be subsidized (by the government) for all union members, union retirees and for community organizations (such as the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now - ACORN).

 

Page 203/line 14-15:  The tax imposed under this section will not be treated as a tax.  (How could anybody in their right mind come up with that?)

 

Page 241 and 253:  Doctors will all be paid the same regardless of specialty, and the government will set all doctors' fees.

 

Page 272. section 1145:  Cancer hospital will ration care according to the patient's age.

 

Page 317 and 321:  The government will impose a prohibition on hospital expansion; however, communities may petition for an exception.

 

Page 425, line 4-12:  The government mandates advance-care planning consultations.  Those on Social Security will be required to attend an "end-of-life planning" seminar every five years. (Death counseling..)

 

Page 429, line 13-25:  The government will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order.

 

 HAD ENOUGH????  Judge Kithil then goes on to identify: 

 

Finally, it is specifically stated that this bill will not apply to members of Congress.

 

No wonder they did not see the need to read it....doesn't apply to them!!! THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED TO STAND UP TO WASHINGTON 

.....

 

I don't know if we can do anything, but awareness helps.

 

 Winds Of Change  --  Warren Buffet is asking each addressee to forward this email to a minimum of twenty people on their address list; in turn, ask each of those to do likewise.

 

At least 20 if you can. 

 

It has to stop somewhere.

 

In three days, most people in The United States of America will have this message.  This is one idea that really should be passed around! 

 

Voters Remember '98 Sexcapades The biggest irony of the 2016 Presidential election is we are seeing a leading political party possibly being hoisted on its own petard. Sex may no longer matter to America.

Voters Remember '98 Sexcapades
The biggest irony of the 2016 Presidential election is we are seeing a leading political party possibly being hoisted on its own petard. Sex may no longer matter to America.

Travel back in memory just 18 years ago. Bill Clinton was in trouble because of his sexcapades while Commander-in-Chief. On Sunday, September 13, 1998, the New York Daily News published an informal poll conducted on the streets of New York. The message came in loud and clear, "New Yorkers did not like the scandal the President got himself into but 'an overwhelming majority (76%) were ready to forgive and forget." In short, Clinton was seen as human and therefore, as it was just sex, he should be allowed to finish his term.

So if extra-marital sex was not a disqualifying position in 1998, why does the Hillary Clinton Campaign news outlets seem to think sex is going to change anything in this election cycle? Yet they seem dumbfounded the daily news reports over sex allegations are not having the desired impact in 2016. 

What was of real import was the New Yorkers, mostly Democrat voters, thought the prosecutor, Ken Starr, was 'far too explicit' in his descriptions of the sexual acts conducted by the President. The cigar put them over the top.

So the conclusion by the Times IN 1998 was, "Many supported Clinton's claim that his relationship with (Monica) Lewinsky is his business and that his sex life and whether he lied about it has NOTHING TO DO WITH HIS ABILITY TO PERFORM HIS JOB." One interviewee even went so far as to support the President no matter what he did because the economy did very good and "if he steps down I do not know what will happen to the economy."

Now it is 2016, the shoe seems to be on the other foot and the mass media and Democrats seemed obsessed over whether or not Donald Trump is 'pulling a Clinton' and what that means to his fitness to be Commander-in-Chief. Are they serious? As a crutch.

The reason is this is the only end game left to them. Over the weekend several commentators urged their followers to forget the polls, "Trump will win." Why could they assert this--because the regular political pollsters cannot see beyond their own safety nets.

In my county, a union-leading Democrat hotbed, early voting began on Oct. 13. By the end of the day on Friday, 4100 early ballots had been cast--a rather large number. But 2700 of those early ballots came from first-time voters or voters who had failed to vote often enough to have their names retained on the rolls. A very interesting fact was over 1900 of the registering voters, just under 72%, took an independent position rather than aligning with one of the two major parties. 

Is this visible backlash against 'the establishment system?' 

I believe it is. Back in February I claimed voter anger at the establishment was a factor the pollsters had not accounted for. I clung to that position before each and every primary vote. I've held fast to it over the past weeks as the debates rolled by.

Every person I know is holding his or her nose over the choice at the top of the ballot. But what I am getting from these people is the disgust with the "Establishment" (which means the leadership of both political parties in Washington) is paramount. The average Josephine and Joe on Main Street loathes both parties equally. Therefore the announced defections by Washington-insider Republicans from their party's candidate is not hurting him nearly as much as it would have 20 years ago. In a perverse way it may be helping him with the unnoticed anti-Establishment voter as both Democrats and insider-Republicans are against him.

The Daily News' story about Bill Clinton those 18 years ago had all the supporting data possible of why removal impeachment was the only possible course for America to remain on the high ground. The Democrats fought like mad to keep their man and settled on a rebuke impeachment instead of removal. They salved their conscience with the idea a rebuke would suffice. Thousands of Americans turned their back on this political decision in disgust. That number has been growing ever since.

This action provides the point the anti-Establishment voter has fixated his anger upon. The pollsters claim they are "putting all Americans in their surveys." How? If these people are not on the rolls, on what basis are they contacting them. Most carry cell phones so using land-line phonebooks (as was the past practice) also doesn't get you in contact with them. 

If Hillary's campaign staff was really as concerned as she claims over Trump's sex allegations--then why is she still with Bill? If it such a disqualifying trait, why is she still with Bill? How can Billy stump for his wife morally when she demoralized his accusers 18 years ago?

The campaign, thankfully, is on its last legs. Since all the independent candidates seem to be running a distant third at best, America's choice seems to be Hil-Liar or the Trumpster at the top of the ticket.

Not much of a choice, but then again the stage was set 18 years ago when the moral high ground was abandoned to maintain the status quo. For decades voters have comprised a shrinking factor in America. Those who willingly dropped rather than opt for a immoral Left versus a high-brow Right may be resurfacing. 

The pollsters do not want what the New Voters want because the pollsters want to maintain Establishment politics. Whoever takes the Oval Office won't be able to govern as they would like however, the aroma of molding cigar still pervades the place and some Americans can't forget.
"I have sworn on the altar of God eternal hostility to every form of tyranny over the mind of man."--Thomas Jefferson

Sunday, October 23, 2016

POLITICS polls-faceoff Clinton Vs. Trump: IBD/TIPP Presidential Election Tracking Poll IBD STAFF5:48 AM ET Donald Trump maintains a 2-point lead over Hillary Clinton (43% - 41%)


The "M" word...by Jeff Foxworthy.





Have you ever wondered why it's OK to make jokes about
Catholics, Jews, Christians, the Pope, the Irish, the
Italians, the Polish, the Hungarians, the Chinese, the
French (including French Canadians), Kiwi's, the elderly, bad
golfers, men/women, blacks/whites, etc, but its insensitive
to make jokes about the Muslims?

Well, it's time to level the playing field and be
politically incorrect, by including our friends, the
Muslims, on this grandiose list.

So Jeff Foxworthy did his part to include the Muslims on his
list ...

1. If you grow and refine heroin for a living, but morally
object to the use of liquor, You may be a Muslim.

2. If you own a $3,000 machine gun and a $5,000 rocket
launcher, but can't afford shoes, You may be a Muslim.

3. If you have more wives than teeth, You may be a Muslim.

4. If you wipe your butt with your bare hand, but consider
bacon to be unclean, You may be a Muslim.

5. If you think vests come in two styles, Bullet-proof and
suicide, You may be a Muslim.

6. If you can't think of anyone that you haven't
declared jihad against, You may be a Muslim.

7. If you consider television dangerous, but routinely carry
explosives in your clothing, You may be a Muslim.

8. If you were amazed to discover that cell phones have
uses, other than setting off roadside bombs, You may be a
Muslim.

9. If you have nothing against women and think every man
should own at least four, then you, too, may be a Muslim.

10. If you find this offensive and do not forward it, you
are part of the problem; but if you delete
this, you are most likely a Muslim.

Freedom Is not Free!

INCOMING GUNFIRE ALWAYS HAS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY!



 



Featured Post

RT @anti_commie32: Keep up the great work!!! https://t.co/FIAnl1hxwG

RT @anti_commie32: Keep up the great work!!! https://t.co/FIAnl1hxwG — Joseph Moran (@JMM7156) May 2, 2023 from Twitter https://twitter....