Monday, September 3, 2012

 
Minorities are Window Dressing for the Democrats
Los Angeles Democrat Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa accused Republicans of using Hispanic speakers during their convention as “window dressing.”
Liberals are all about window dressing. Once you get inside the store, the shelves are bare or stocked with worn out political clichés and empty promises. This is especially true when it comes to minorities.
Liberals work hard to get minorities to the polls to vote so the liberal establishment can stay in power, but Liberals are reluctant to give minorities enough power to govern themselves. If the word gets out that a minority can be independent of government, then it might get back to other “brown skin” people that they can do it too. When this happens, the Democrat Party is finished.
There are a number of articles floating around on the Internet about how few black and brown faces there were among the Republican delegates. Michelle Malkin, something of a brown face herself, tweeted the following:
SHAME SHAME SHAME on all you racist progs playing the #negrospotting game. Dear God, you people are sick.
Of course there aren’t that many black Republican delegates; they’re mostly liberal Democrat field hands that do the bidding of their Democrat masters. Every two years, Democrats rent a cadre of black- and brown-face voters for an election telling them that their only hope is to vote for them, and they do it, even though most Hispanics and Blacks have more in common with Republican principles.
Colby King, a columnist for the Washington Post, said Republicans “always have African-Americans on the [convention] podium. Either it’s somebody singing ‘God Bless America,’ or praying, you know, before or after.” Let’s put this claim to the test:
Mia Love (mayor and candidate for US House from Utah)
Arthur Davis (former US Congressman from Alabama)
Jane Edmonds (served in Romney’s Massachusetts cabinet)
Luis Fortuno (Governor of Puerto Rico)
Luce Vela Fortuno (First Lady of Puerto Rico)
Condoleezza Rice (former Secretary of State)
Ted Cruz (candidate for US Senate from Texas)
Nikki Haley (governor of South Carolina)
Brian Sandoval (governor of Nevada)
Sher Valenzuela (candidate for Lt. Gov. of Delaware)
Marco Rubio (US Senator from Florida)
By the way, the Republicans had a white guy pray at the end of the convention, the same white guy who’s going to pray at the Democrat National Convention — Roman Catholic Cardinal Timothy Michael Dolan of New York who I hope will denounce the DNC’s platform for supporting abortion on demand and homosexual marriage, two issues that most brown- and black-faced people abhor.

Interesting
 
 
There are actually two messages here. The first is very interesting,
but the second is absolutely astounding - and explains a lot.

A recent "Investor's Business Daily" article provided very interesting
statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health Organization.

Percentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years
after diagnosis:

U.S. 65%

England 46%

Canada 42%


Percentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received
treatment within six months:

U.S. 93%

England 15%

Canada 43%


Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received
it within six months:

U.S. 90%

England 15%

Canada 43%


Percentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within
one month:

U.S. 77%

England 40%

Canada 43%


Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million
people:

U.S. 71

England 14

Canada 18


Percentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they
are in "excellent health":

U.S. 12%

England 2%

Canada 6%


And now for the last statistic:


National Health Insurance?

U.S. NO

England YES

Canada YES


Check this final set of statistics!!

The percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked
in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet.
You know what the private business sector is a real-life business, not a
government job. Here are the percentages.


T. Roosevelt.................... 38%

Taft.................................40%

Wilson ............................52%

Harding........................... 49%

Coolidge......................... 48%

Hoover ........................... 42%

F. Roosevelt................... 50%

Truman........................... 50%

Eisenhower................ .... 57%

Kennedy......................... 30%

Johnson.......................... 47%

Nixon.............................. 53%

Ford................................ 42%

Carter............................. 32%

Reagan........................... 56%

GH Bush......................... 51%

Clinton .......................... 39%

GW Bush........................ 55%

Obama..................... 8%


This helps to explain the incompetence of this administration:
only 8% of them have ever worked in private business!

That's right! Only eight percent---the least, by far, of the
last 19 presidents! And these people are trying to tell our big
corporations how to run their business?

How can the president of a major nation and society, the one
with the most successful economic system in world history, stand
and talk about business when he's never worked for one? Or about
jobs when he has never really had one? And when it's the same for
92% of his senior staff and closest advisers? They've spent most of
their time in academia, government and/or non-profit jobs or as
"community organizers." They should have been in an employment line.

Pass this on because we'll NEVER see these facts in the main
stream media.





These Billboards will be going up on an electronic billboard on HWY 321
in Lenoir City , TN starting 1 OCT. It was a private project funded by
private donations. It will be fun to see what the reaction will be. The
ads will start to run October 1. (The only thing that is missing from
the ads is the "Paid for by" disclaimer, but that will be in very small
print).


One more important favor:
PLEASE send this entire presentation of nine billboards to all of your
friends and family. We must strive to have thousands of voters look
at our billboard messages by email and any other electronic means. I
hope these messages will be seen by the entire country before November
2.















=

Sunday, September 2, 2012

Around the World with Ken Ham


Posted: 01 Sep 2012 10:42 PM PDT
I was so thrilled to get this letter from a woman in Idaho who visited the Creation Museum with her family. I trust her “raving fan” comments will encourage you as much as they did me, and if you have never been to our high-tech, family-friendly museum, it will encourage you to visit us. Now that we are out of the busy summer season, you don’t have to be concerned about the crowds; and our botanical garden—an attraction in itself—is beautiful right now.
If you doubt that the museum is worth a trip to our Cincinnati area, read on . . .
This spring, a dream came true for our family . . . we took a road trip out to Kentucky to visit your Creation Museum. We drove 2,100 miles one way to get there, but it was worth every mile!
I want to take this opportunity to express how your ministry has been such a tremendous blessing to our family. Of the several ministries dedicated to [creation] and to defending the Gospel, by far Answers in Genesis is our absolute favorite.
I am a home-schooling mother of two, and I consider your wide variety of resources to be invaluable, both educationally and spiritually. Hardly a day goes by when some member of ourfamily isn’t browsing your website for activities, books, or media to be used at home or church. Your video on demand section is amazing—thank you for generously allowing us to access [your videos] and wealth of knowledgeable sources!
We were able to spend two full days at the Creation Museum, and it seemed like each day we were the first to arrive and the last to leave. None of us wanted to miss out on a moment! I cannot even begin to explain how that experience strengthened us as a family. My mind is filled with memories.
The Creation Museum innovatively brings the Bible to life, and then extends the invitation for us to journey through it.
Your themed exhibits surpassed our expectations. Uncompromising detail was portrayed in every aspect of the displays, and the quality was truly a reflection of the passionate heart you have for our Creator and the truth of His Scriptures! I honestly cannot comprehend how anyone can travel through the Creation Museum and not become a believer. The museum is such a compelling presentation of the Bible.
The animatronic Noah was my absolute favorite in the museum! I pulled up a seat in front of him, pressed all the buttons at least once, and listened to Noah’s responses that were heartfelt on so many levels. I’m not ashamed to admit that tears came to my eyes as I reflected on the comparison of Jesus as our present-day Ark of Salvation, a concept I learned from AiG. I now incorporate this parallel while teaching small group Bible studies and children’s church.
Your planetarium and special effects theater were truly wondrous!
My son and daughter (ages 11 and 13) were so very impressed with the many dinosaurs displayed throughout the museum. They have studied these fantastic creatures for years, and what a thrill it was to be up close and personal with your remarkably crafted sculptures. My children are huge fans of all things AiG, soaking up biblical truths every chance they get. Speaking as a parent, I see your organization as a precious gift to me, and I appreciate the responsibility you have assumed in equipping the family and giving us an understanding of the times we are living in!
We have integrated a wide variety of AiG DVDs, books, magazines, pamphlets, wall charts, and educational curricula into our church library.
Thank you for your faithfulness to your calling. God willing, we will be back to experience theArk Encounter when that is completed . . . a very exciting prospect! Be encouraged and know that west of the Rockies, and in this corner of North Idaho, a family has partnered with your ministry to defend the gospel of Jesus Christ.
—A.G., Idaho
For some very special events coming to the museum over the next few weeks, see our calendar of activities at creationmuseum.org/events
Thanks for stopping by and thanks for praying,
Ken

 How to get to Mars -- MUST SEE!
 

 

Incredible.... All I can say is absolute GENIUS !!!!!
 

Saturday, September 1, 2012

Around the World with Ken Ham


Posted: 01 Sep 2012 08:39 AM PDT
Recently  a video on YouTube entitled “Creationism is inappropriate for children” was produced by Bill Nye (known as Bill Nye the Science Guy” from television) and it received over 3 million views—and gained much publicity through the secular media.
AiG responded to Nye’s anti-creationist video with a detailed article on the AiG website and also two videos on YouTube.  In one video, I decided to personally respond and with the title “Bill Nye the Humanist Guy.”  Bill Nye was given the humanist of the year award in 2010 and  has a definite anti-God agenda.  So it should not be surprising to anyone that he would come out with such a blast at those who don’t teach children evolution as fact—as he wants to see happen.
I don’t think its a coincidence that this anti-creation video has been posted as Bill Nye has a new video show coming on YouTube.  I’m sure he and those producing his new show realized that if they came out against creationists, particularly in regard to the teaching of children, they would get all sorts of publicity leading up to their new show.
I encourage you to watch both YouTube videos produced by AiG/Creation Museum—they both expose Bill Nye and the falsity of his arguments:
1.  www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxX11c1cSWU
2.   www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-AyDtD6sPA
I also encourage you to read AiG’s detailed written response to Bill Nye’s propaganda video:
www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2012/08/30/bill-nye-crusade-for-your-kids
And I love how AiG’s cartoonist Dan Lietha responded to Bill Nye:
www.answersingenesis.org/media/image/cartoons/after-eden/competent-advice
There have been a number of media articles linked to or mentioned AiG’s various responses:
religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/08/31/creationists-hit-back-at-bill-nye-with-their-own-video
www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=38628
www.christianpost.com/news/creationist-organization-posts-rebuttal-to-bill-nye-video-80938
www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/12678-”science-guy”-attacks-parents-who-teach-children-creation-story
We  need to be reminded to pray for people like Bill Nye—from all we know about him, he isspiritually lost and so needs the Lord!
Thanks for stopping by and thanks for praying,
Ken


This takes sucking up to the boss to a whole new level!

 



List for 2012


            
 
HERE IS ALL I WANT:


Obama: Gone!


Borders: Closed!


Congress: Obey its own laws


Language: English only


Culture: Constitution, and the Bill of Rights!


Drug Free: Mandatory Drug Screening before Welfare!


NO freebies to: Non-Citizens!


We the people are coming!




Only 8% will send this on. Should be a 100%.
Please send it if only to one person.
HOW TO INSTALL A SOUTHERN HOME SECURITY SYSTEM

1.
 Go to Goodwill and buy a pair of size 14-16 men's work boots.
2.
 Place them on your front porch, along with a copy of Guns & Ammo Magazine.
3. Put four giant dog dishes next to the boots and magazines.
4. Leave a note on your door that reads ......

Bubba,

Me and Marcel, Donnie Ray and Jimmy Earl went for more ammo and beer. Be back in an hour. Don't mess with the pit bulls. They got the mailman this morning and messed him up bad. I don't think Killer took part, but it was hard to tell from all the blood. Anyway, I locked all four of 'em in the house. Better wait outside. Be right back.

Cooter
 

One Citizen Speaking...


Posted: 31 Aug 2012 03:26 PM PDT
It has been often said that everything in Washington is for sale and that which is not for sale can be leased …
What do the following individuals have in common?
  • Former Attorney General Michael Mukasey
  • Former Congressman Patrick Kennedy (Rhode Island)
  • Noted Author Carl Bernstein;
  • Former Governor Howard Dean (Vermont)
  • Former Governor Ed Rendell (Pennsylvania)
  • Former House Speaker Dennis Hastert (Illinois)
  • Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani (New York)
  • Retired General Henry Shelton
  • Retired General George Casey
  • Retired Lieutenant General David Deptula
  • Former FBI director Louis Freeh <Source>
It appears that they are all attempting to informally lobby government officials by “questioning the listing of an obscure Iranian group called the Mujahadin-e Khalq (MEK) on the U.S. government list of officially designated foreign terrorist organizations.” Some of these people I formerly respected as incorruptible or patriotic. Now I can see they are money-grubbing whores who are willing to challenge the intelligence agencies of the United States for their personal benefit and profit. I am thoroughly disgusted by the democrats and the republicans on this list. As for the journalists who purport to be unbiased, it is just another sign of the loss of journalistic ethics and the support of a cause that is alien to the American dream.
How is it that any Americans want to assist any Iranian group?
At least according to Bernstein: “The speech, before a crowd an organizer put at 1,500, made Bernstein one of the few journalists who has appeared at events in a years-long campaign by MEK supporters to free the group from the official terrorist label and the legal sanctions that come with it. He told ProPublica that he was paid $12,000 for the appearance but that, ‘I was not there as an advocate.’”
Then: “Bernstein told the crowd that, ‘I come here as an advocate of the best obtainable version of the truth’ and as ‘someone who believes in basic human rights and their inalienable status.’ He alsochallenged the State Department, saying that if the agency ‘has evidence that the MEK is a terrorist organization, have a show-cause hearing in court, let them prove it.’”
Bernstein's speech, reprinted on the websiteof another pro-MEK group under the title "The Kafkaesque Nature of Things," compared the presence of the MEK on the terrorist list to hisparents' experience belonging to a group that was on a U.S. government list of subversive organizations during the McCarthy era.
“So I know, like you, what it means to be designated a certain way and your cause and your purpose misunderstood, twisted, and turned into something that it is not," he said. "When, in fact, the evil, the terrorism, the real terrorism, is in the heart of Tehran, not in this room."
In an interview, Bernstein told ProPublica that the pro-MEK events are “obviously … part of a lobbying campaign” but his speech  was “largely about using the designation of terrorist and subversive organizations as a smokescreen for other things.” He said that stories focusing on speakers at pro-MEK events rather than on “the substance of what the controversy is” amounted to “journalistic McCarthyism.” <Source>
Was it for the money or because liberals are soft on national defense and constitutionally (pun) and prone to serve as useful idiots for foreign sovereign causes?
For example, former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, a Democrat, received $160,000 for appearing at seven pro-MEK rallies and conferences, his office confirmed  to NBC in March. Each event typically involves five to 10 former officials who speak in favor of removing the group from the terrorist list. The typical fee for a speaker at one of the events has been in the $20,000 range, according to news reports. Pro-MEK groups are thought to have spent millions of dollars on the events in recent years. <Source>
What happened to one working journalist is a cautionary tale of how America may be subverted from within …
ProPublica reported in July that syndicated columnist Clarence Page had spoken at a large rally in Paris featuring MEK leader Maryam Rajavi; after we reached out to Page, he said he would reimburse his $20,000 speaker’s fee, and the Chicago Tribune reprimanded him  for violating the company ethics code. <Source>
Here is a person who can slant stories and spin the truth … and he is being paid a great sum of money to advocate for a group that is listed by the United States government as a terrorist group. Why wasn’t he sanctioned by the government for providing aid and comfort to an enemy of the United States? Or is the liberal dominated Justice Department, headed by Eric Holder, too busy killing all of the pesky state legislation that protects the Constitution and the sovereignty of the United States?
Is Iran our enemy?
In the past few years, pro-MEK groups have marshaled considerable financial resources to bring high-profile speakers to an unending stream of rallies and other events in the U.S. and Europe. The pro-MEK campaign has taken on new prominence against the backdrop of thenuclear standoff involving the U.S., Israel and Iran, whose government is a sworn enemy of the MEK.
The group, sometimes described as cult-like by critics, is blamed by the State Departmentfor killing Americans in several attacks in Iran in the 1970s and in attacking Iranian targets through the early 2000s. The MEK now says it has renounced violence and has sued to be removed from the terrorist list.
The public push in the U.S. is notable both because it has brought together a large bipartisan group of former top military officials and veteran politicians from both parties and also because of the large sums of money paid for those appearances. <Source>
My question …
Is this MEK group spinning themselves an an anti-Iran freedom fighting group to allow them to be removed from the terrorist watch list and the sanctions which would keep them from purchasing “dual use” technology or other materials that would bring aid and comfort to Iran? It would not be the first time that a front group did whatever was necessary for their cause.
Bottom line …
It is obvious, even to the casual observer that something evil is happening to our country. Pro-Marxist/Communist groups have subverted the political process, mostly involving the democrat party, and that rampant political corruption is going unchecked. Prominent politicians and others are openly espousing causes which, only a few decades ago, would have been regarded as enemies and such advocacy tantamount to sedition and/or treason.
We see major United States Corporations using foreign subsidiaries to “fullfill long existing contracts” with our enemies.
According to Bill O’Reilly of Fox News, General Electric, the parent company of NBC, is doing business with Iran.
Iran is listed as a state that sponsors terrorism, and the Pentagon has confirmed that Iranian weapons are being used to kill Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan.A former NBC correspondent John Hockenberry says that GE continues to do business with Iran. CEO Jeffrey Immelt said in a statement, “It is unfortunate that John Hockenberry seems to be so far out of touch with reality. The comments are so utterly absurd; we will have no further comment.”
But then O’Reilly pursues the story and gets astatement from GE, saying it no longer does business with Iran, except fulfilling past contracts and humanitarian stuff. But O’Reilly finds out that through subsidiaries, GE is working with the Iranian government on hydroelectric, oil and gas, and medical projects. <Source>
We need to reform our government and the way our multi-national corporations do business. We cannot impose sanctions against an enemy and have them violated by a foreign subsidiary of any American company. Perhaps why so many companies are now incorporated in the Bahamas. Switzerland and elsewhere.
And we need to start right now in 2012 by removing President Obama and his fellow travelers from power in the Presidency, the Senate and the House of Representatives. We need to shut the revolving door between government and law firms known to be lobbyists for foreign powers. We need to put country over compromise, manhood over money.
It is time to take action at the voting booths. Before America is simply purchased and discarded by those who do not wish America well.
-- steve
Reference Links …
Watergate Journalist Carl Bernstein Spoke at Event Supporting Iranian ‘Terrorist’ Group

Friday, August 31, 2012

Unhappy Muslims  
What can be done about it?

I have to admit, this is brilliant...never heard it put this
way...so succinct and to the point...plain and simple!!!

Whoever thought this out is nothing less than a genius

THE MUSLIMS ARE NOT HAPPY!

They're not happy in Gaza ..
They're not happy in Egypt ..
They're not happy in Libya ..
They're not happy in Morocco ..
They're not happy in Iran ..
They're not happy in Iraq ..
They're not happy in Yemen ..
They're not happy in Afghanistan ..
They're not happy in Pakistan ..
They're not happy in Syria ..
They're not happy in Lebanon ..

SO, WHERE ARE THEY HAPPY?

They're happy in Australia .
They're happy in Canada.
They're happy in England ..
They're happy in France ..
They're happy in Italy ..
They're happy in Germany ..
They're happy in Sweden ..
They're happy in the USA ..
They're happy in Norway ..
They're happy in Holland .
They're happy in Denmark .

Basically, they're happy in every country that is not Muslim
and unhappy in every country that is!

AND WHO DO THEY BLAME?

Not Islam.
Not their leadership.
Not themselves.

THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN!

AND THEN; They want to change those countries to be like....
THE COUNTRY THEY CAME FROM WHERE THEY WERE UNHAPPY!

Excuse me, but I can't help wondering...
How damn dumb can you get?
WELL WORTH THE READ

 


  Dick Kantenberger
Gifted Education Writer
Examiner.com 


History Lesson on Your Social Security Card

Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn't know this.
It's easy to check out, if you don't believe it. Be sure and show it to your family
and friends. They need a little history lesson on what's what and it doesn't matter
whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts.

Social Security Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and
card were not to be used for identification purposes.
Since nearly everyone in the
United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the
message, NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION, was removed.

http://examiner.com/

An old Social Security card with the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message.
Our Social Security

Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. He promised:

1.) That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary,
 
No longer Voluntary
 

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program,
 
Now 7.65%
 on the first $90,000


3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year,
 

No longer tax deductible
 

4.) That the money the participants put into the independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and,
 
Under Johnson the money was moved to

The General Fund and Spent 


5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.
 
Under Clinton & Gore

Up to 85% of your Social Security can be Taxed 

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month -- 
and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to 'put away' -- 

Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent 'Trust Fund' and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it? 

A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate. 


Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding? 

A: The Democratic Party. 


Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities? 

A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the 'tie-breaking' deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US 


Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?

AND MY FAVORITE: 

A: That's right!


Jimmy Carter
 and the Democratic Party.
Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it! 

Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away! 

And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!


If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. But it's worth a try.
How many people can YOU send this to? 

Actions speak louder than bumper stickers 
  

Featured Post

RT @anti_commie32: Keep up the great work!!! https://t.co/FIAnl1hxwG

RT @anti_commie32: Keep up the great work!!! https://t.co/FIAnl1hxwG — Joseph Moran (@JMM7156) May 2, 2023 from Twitter https://twitter....