Proposed 28th Amendment - the amendment is just 3 states short of happening. This will take less than thirty seconds to read. If you agree, please pass it on. This is an idea that we need to address.

From: Thomas Bell

Proposed 28th Amendment - the amendment is just 3 states short of happening.

 

This is what Mark Levine has been talking about--a constitutional convention by the states to get back to the laws of the Constitution.

This will take less than thirty seconds to read.  If you agree, please pass it on.   This is an idea that we need to address.

 

       =   =   =   =   =   =   =   =   =   =   =   =    =   

35 STATES SO FAR...AND GROWING - One message to forward!

 

 

Governors of 35 states have filed suit against the Federal Government for imposing unlawful burdens upon them.   It only takes 38 (of the 50) States to convene a Constitutional Convention. This will take less than thirty seconds to read.  If you agree, please pass it on.

 

 

          For too long we have been too complacent about the workings of Congress.  Their latest stunt is to exempt themselves from the Healthcare Reform that they passed ... in all of its forms.  Somehow, that doesn't seem logical.  We do not have an elite ruling class that is above the law.  I truly don't care if they are Democrat, Republican, Independent or whatever.  The self-serving must stop.

           If each person that receives this will forward it on to 15 people, in three days, most people in The United States of America will have the message.  This is one proposal that really should be passed around.

 

         Proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution: "Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators, Representatives of Congress; and, Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators and/or  Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States    ..."

 

            You are one of my 15.  Please keep this going.

10 Things You Should Never Post On Social Networks

• Share
• Pin
• Email

Turnbull/Ikon Images/Getty Images

by Andy O'Donnell

Updated August 21, 2016 

We share so many details of our daily lives online, but where should we draw the line on what we share about ourselves, our family, and our friends? There are some tidbits of personal information that it is best to never share online, here are ten of them:

1. Your Full Birthdate

While you may love getting loads of birthday wishes posted by your friends on your Facebook Timeline, having your birthdate posted on your profile may provide scammers and identity thieves with one of the key pieces of information needed to steal your identity and open up accounts in your name.

2. Your Current Location

Many people don't realize that when they post a status update or a tweet, they may also be revealing their current location. Giving out your location information can be dangerous because it tells potential thieves that you might not be at home. Depending on your privacy settings, that innocent tweet from your vacation spot might give the bad guys the green light they were waiting for to rob your house.

3. Pictures of Your Children or Your Friends' Children Tagged With Their Names

Ok, this is a sensitive topic. We all want to protect our kids, we would lay down in front of a truck to protect them, but many of us post hundreds of name tagged pictures of our children online for the world to see. The problem is that you can never be sure that only your friends are seeing these pictures. What if your friend has their phone stolen or logs into Facebook from the library and forgets to log out?

You can't rely on the "Friends only" setting because you really never know. Assume that everything is public and don't post anything that you wouldn't want the world having access to.

If you must post pictures of your children, remove any geotag information, and avoid using their real names in the picture tag or description.

Your true friends know their names, no need to label them. Same goes for tagging pictures of your friends' kids. If in doubt leave the tag out.

I would be a hypocrite if I said I had removed all tags of my kids from Facebook. It's a long process to go back through years worth of photos, but I work on it a little bit at a time, eventually I'll have them all removed.

4. Your Home Address

Again, you never know who might be looking at your profile. Don't post where you live as you are making things easy for the bad guys. What can criminals do with your address? Check out our article on How Criminals Use Google Maps to 'Case the Joint' to find out.

5. Your Real Phone Number

While you may want your friends to be able to contact you, what if your real phone number falls into the wrong hands. It's possible that your location could be narrowed down by someone using a reverse phone number lookup tool which are freely available on the Internet.

An easy way to allow people to contact you by phone without giving them your real phone number is by using a Google Voice phone number as a go-between. Check out our article on How to Use Google Voice as a Privacy Firewall for full details.

6. Your Relationship Status

Want to give your stalker the green light they've been waiting for while simultaneously letting them know that your more likely to be home alone?

Posting your relationship status is the surest way to accomplish this. If you want to be mysterious, just say "It's Complicated".

7. Pictures With Geotags

There's no better road map to your current location than a geotagged picture. Your phone might be recording the location of all pictures you take without you even knowing it. To find out more about why geotags aren't necessarily as cool as you thought they were and to learn how to nix them from your pix, check out our article on How to Remove Geotags from Pictures.

8. Vacation Plans

"Hey, I'm going to be on vacation on the 25th of August, please come rob me", that's basically what you're saying to social network trolling criminals when you post your vacation plans, vacation photos, and when you location tag yourself while you're still on vacation. Wait until you are safely home before uploading your vacation pics or talking about your vacation online. Is "checking in" at that fancy restaurant really worth giving up your location information to potential criminals?

Check out our article on How to Disable Facebook Places Location Tracking for tips on how to avoid accidentally checking in somewhere.

9. Embarrassing Things You Wouldn't Want Shared With Your Employer or Family

Before you post anything online, think to yourself, would I want my boss or family to see this? If not, don't post it. Even if you post something and delete it, doesn't mean that someone didn't take a screenshot of it before you had the chance to remove it. For more tips on this topic check out our article: How to Monitor and Protect Your Online Reputation.

10. Information About Your Current Job or Work-related Projects

Talking about work-related things on social networks is a bad idea. Even an innocent status update about how mad you are about missing a deadline on a project could provide valuable information to your competitors that they could leverage against your company.

Does your company have a security awareness training program to help educate users about threats such as these? If not, check out How to Create a Security Awareness Training Program to learn how to develop one.

Ads

Catch Your Cheater Spouse

spokeo.com/Cheating-Spouse-Search

Enter Their Email Address. See Hidden Social Profiles & Pics Now!

Who's He/She Been Texting

phone.instantcheckmate.com

1) Enter A Phone Number 2) Find Everything They're Hiding

This list contains titles, links of proof, quotes from the links, and commentary from Reddit. These are just SOME of the thousands of leaks exposing Hillary Clinton's corruption, and mainly comprise of the Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta's emails, as well as a few other sources (FBI docs, DNC leaks, etc.) So much cover-up, media collusion, and pay for play proof was not included, otherwise this list would be too long.

Open this and view Wikileaks facts.

http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/

Muslim Imperialism Reaches the United Nations by Denis MacEoin  •  October 29, 2016 at 5:00 am UNESCO has joined forces with Islamic State. The fundamentalists now have a new weapon: resolutions passed by servile international bodies. An earlier delay and the opposition of UNESCO's chief, Irina Bokova, had raised hopes that this act of jihadist, barbaric, unjust, and, frankly, arrogant supremacism might be voted down. It was not. Now a new lie was given the sanction of the world's largest and most unaccountable body whose reason for being is to preserve significant sites, not to bowdlerize them. Lies by UNESCO to rewrite history, erasing all traces of Judaism and Christianity to favour a jihadist Islamic fancy, were already under way in 2015. UNESCO fraudulently renamed two ancient Biblical Jewish sites, Rachel's Tomb and the Cave of the Patriarchs, as Islamic sites. Historically, Islam did not even existuntil the seventh century. This is the history of Islam, how it takes over -- with both hard jihad (violence) and soft jihad (usurping history, migration [hijrah], political and cultural infiltration), and intimidation (soft jihad with the threat of hard jihad underneath it). What is even more saddening is that often, as with this vote, it is done with the West's cooperation and voluntary submission. Before the United Nations, with its authoritarian, anti-democratic voting blocs, finishes eradicating Western, Judeo-Christian civilization, as it is clearly trying to do, it is high time for Western democracies to run, not walk, away, before further harm comes to them too, as it surely promises to do. UNESCO's latest resolution to deny any Jewish link to Jerusalem's Temple Mount, the most central of all Jewish holy sites, is not the first time the body has tried to rewrite and falsify a history going back thousands of years. UNESCO had previously declared the Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron (left) as the "Ibrahimi Mosque," and Rachel's Tomb in Bethlehem (right) as the "Bilal ibn Rabah Mosque." (Images source: Wikimedia Commons) UNESCO last August planned to vote on the historical status of Jerusalem's Temple Mount and its associated Western Wall. Back then, this author stated that UNESCO's plan was to deny any Jewish link to this most central of all Jewish holy sites, to trash a history going back thousands of years, and to claim the Mount and the Wall as Islamic sites. Islam believes that it is eternal and had therefore preceded the other two great monotheisms, Judaism and Christianity, even though it was only to become visible to the world through Mohammad in the seventh century AD, but entitled to elbow out the two older religions. Lies by UNESCO to rewrite history, erasing all traces of Judaism and Christianity to favour a jihadist Islamic fancy, were already under way in 2015. UNESCO fraudulently renamed two ancient Biblical Jewish sites, Rachel's Tomb and the Cave of the Patriarchs -- abracadabra -- Islamic sites. Continue Reading Article You are subscribed to this list as josephmoran7156@gmail.com. To unsubscribe, go to https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/list_unsubscribe.php To edit your subscription options, go to https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/list_edit.php To subscribe to the this mailing list, go to https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/list_subscribe.php Gatestone Institute 14 East 60 St., Suite 1001, New York, NY 10022

The 2016 Presidential Election: Voting from a Catholic Perspective (taught in one awesome homily)

https://tomperna.org/2016/10/04/the-2016-presidential-election-voting-from-a-catholic-perspective-taught-in-one-awesome-homily/

Att’y General Loretta Lynch Pleads The 5th When Asked Questions About Obama’s Iran Ransom Payment

New post on Now The End Begins Att’y General Loretta Lynch Pleads The 5th When Asked Questions About Obama’s Iran Ransom Payment by Geoffrey Grider Attorney General Loretta Lynch is declining to comply with an investigation by leading members of Congress about the Obama administration’s secret efforts to send Iran $1.7 billion in cash earlier this year, prompting accusations that Lynch has “pleaded the Fifth” Amendment to avoid incriminating herself over these payments Sen. Marco Rubio (R., Fla.) and Rep. Mike Pompeo (R., Kan.) initially presented Lynch in October with a series of questions about how the cash payment to Iran was approved and delivered. In an Oct. 24 response, Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik responded on Lynch’s behalf, refusing to answer the questions and informing the lawmakers that they are barred from publicly disclosing any details about the cash payment, which was bound up in a ransom deal aimed at freeing several American hostages from Iran. Loretta Lynch Pleads the Fifth To Protect Obama In Iran $1.7 Billion Hostage Money The response from the attorney general’s office is “unacceptable” and provides evidence that Lynch has chosen to “essentially plead the fifth and refuse to respond to inquiries regarding [her] role in providing cash to the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism,” Rubio and Pompeo wrote on Friday in a follow-up letter to Lynch, according to a copy obtained by the Free Beacon. The inquiry launched by the lawmakers is just one of several concurrent ongoing congressional probes aimed at unearthing a full accounting of the administration’s secret negotiations with Iran. “It is frankly unacceptable that your department refuses to answer straightforward questions from the people’s elected representatives in Congress about an important national security issue,” the lawmakers wrote. “Your staff failed to address any of our questions, and instead provided a copy of public testimony and a lecture about the sensitivity of information associated with this issue.” Obama on Iran payment: 'We do not pay ransom' “As the United States’ chief law enforcement officer, it is outrageous that you would essentially plead the fifth and refuse to respond to inquiries,” they stated. “The actions of your department come at time when Iran continues to hold Americans hostage and unjustly sentence them to prison.” The lawmakers included a copy of their previous 13 questions and are requesting that Lynch provide answers by Nov. 4. When asked about Lynch’s efforts to avoid answering questions about the cash payment, Pompeo told the Free Beacon that the Obama administration has blocked Congress at every turn as lawmakers attempt to investigate the payments to Iran. “Who knew that simple questions regarding Attorney General Lynch’s approval of billions of dollars in payments to Iran could be so controversial that she would refuse to answer them?” Pompeo said. “This has become the Obama administration’s coping mechanism for anything related to the Islamic Republic of Iran—hide information, obfuscate details, and deny answers to Congress and the American people.” Obama Administration Finally Admits $400M To Iran Was Ransom For Hostages “They know this isn’t a sustainable strategy, however, and I trust they will start to take their professional, and moral, obligations seriously,” the lawmaker added. In the Oct. 24 letter to Rubio and Pompeo, Assistant Attorney General Kadzik warned the lawmakers against disclosing to the public any information about the cash payment. Details about the deal are unclassified, but are being kept under lock and key in a secure facility on Capitol Hill, the Free Beacon first disclosed. Lawmakers and staffers who have clearance to view the documents are forced to relinquish their cellular devices and are barred from taking any notes about what they see. “Please note that these documents contain sensitive information that is not appropriate for public release,” Kadzik wrote to the lawmakers. “Disclosure of this information beyond members of the House and Senate and staff who are able to view them could adversely affect the diplomatic relations of the United States, including with key allies, as well as the State Department’s ability to defend [legal] claims against the United States [by Iran] that are still being litigated at the Hague Tribunal.” “The public release of any portion of these documents, or the information contained therein, is not authorized by the transmittal of these documents or by this communication,” Kadzik wrote. Congressional sources have told the Free Beaconthat this is another part of the effort to hide details about these secret negotiations with Iran from the American public. One senior congressional source familiar with both the secret documents and the inquiry into them told the Free Beacon that the details of the negotiations are so damning that the administration’s best strategy is to ignore lawmakers’ requests for more information. “Every Obama administration official and department involved in the Iran Deal appear to be running for cover,” the source said. “Like we feared, the Iran deal is turning out to be a disaster and Iran is emboldened in its aggression. Evidently Attorney General Lynch and the Department of Justice have decided ‘refusal to cooperate’ is their best strategy. But this is dangerous and ultimately won’t protect them from anything.” source Geoffrey Grider | October 28, 2016 at 5:57 pm | URL: http://wp.me/p1kFP6-cbj Comment    See all comments Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from Now The End Begins. Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:  http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/attorney-general-loretta-lynch-pleads-5th-asked-questions-obama-iran-ransom-payment/

Ever Wonder Why Republicans Want Voter ID? Here are some insights as to why...

why ...    The next time you hear Hillary, or any other Democrat, ranting about Republicans wanting to disenfranchise minorities by requiring voter ID, please keep the following in mind these facts:   * In 59 voting districts in the Philadelphia area, Obama received 100% of the votes with not even a single vote recorded for Romney. (A mathematical and statistical impossibility).   * In 21 districts in Wood County Ohio, Obama received 100% of the votes where GOP inspectors were illegally removed from their polling locations - and not one single vote was recorded for Romney. (Another statistical impossibility).   * In Wood County Ohio, 106,258 voted in a county with only 98,213 eligible voters.   * In St. Lucie County, FL, there were 175,574 registered eligible voters but 247,713 votes were cast.   * The National SEAL Museum, a polling location in St. Lucie County, FL had a158% voter turnout.   * Palm Beach County, FL had a 141% voter turnout.   * In one Ohio County, Obama won by 108% of the total number of eligible voters   NOTE: Obama won in every state that did not require a Photo ID and lost in every state that did require a Photo ID in order to vote.  A coincidence? If it is, then America is THE DUMBEST NATION ON THE PLANET!