Quickies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

    

    

 

    

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Europe's Planned Migrant Revolution

by Yves Mamou  •  November 12, 2016 at 5:00 am Between 2005 to 2014, Germany welcomed more than 6,000,000 people. Two essential questions about integration must be put on the table: 1) What do we ask of newcomers? And 2) What do we do to those who do not accept our conditions? In Europe, these two questions of integration were never asked of anyone. In the new migrant order, the host population is invited to make room for the newcomer and bear the burden not of what is an "integration," but the acceptance of a coerced coexistence. "No privileges are granted to the Europeans or to their heritage. All cultures have the same citizenship. There is no recognition of a substantial European culture that it might be useful to preserve." — Michèle Tribalat, sociologist and demographer. "We need people that we welcome to love France." — French Archbishop Pontier, Le Monde, October 2016. When "good feelings" did not work, however, the authorities have often criminalized and prosecuted anti-immigration critics. The Dutch politician Geert Wilders is currently on trial for trying to defend his country from Moroccan immigrants whose skyrocketing crime wave has been transforming the Netherlands. Thousands of migrants cross illegally into Slovenia on foot, in this screenshot from YouTube video filmed in October 2015. Everyone now knows -- even German Chancellor Angela Merkel -- that she committed a political mistake in opening the doors of her country to more than a million migrants from the the Middle East, Africa and Asia. It was, politically, a triple mistake: Continue Reading Article

the morning after......///WE DID IT ----NO MORE HILLARY ///

 

 

 

---

Musings after the Election 2016...

   

Thank you Matt Walsh:

Leftists today are searching for answers to explain their defeat. They arrived at a conclusion pretty quickly, it seems. Clinton lost because Americans are sexist, racist, bigoted, awful, stupid, and hateful. They nominated the worst candidate in the history of the United States and have decided that she lost because WE'RE defective. 

So, rather than simply gloating over their defeat, I'd like to help them make better sense of all of this. I know you probably won't listen, leftists, but in my piece I explain the three fundamental reasons why the next president will be named Donald Trump. None of the reasons have anything to do with any -ism. 

I'll elaborate in the article, but here's a snapshot:

1) Hillary Clinton is a corrupt, deceitful, detestable crook. It turns out that a lot of Americans were not enthused about the idea of putting a crime family back in the White House. It turns out that, actually, most Americans aren't willing to elect someone while she's under two active FBI investigations. Who knew? Well, we knew, but you wouldn't listen. 

2) This is very important: white working class Americans are tired of being lectured and insulted and condescended to and accused of bigotry. "All straight white men are racist and sexist" is, actually, not the best rallying cry. Especially because you need some of those straight white men to turn out for you, but why should they? You don't like them. You don't respect them. And it seems the feeling is mutual.

3) Your policies are failures. Exhibit A: Obamacare. 

These are the three reasons why you lost. Not bigotry. Not prejudice. It just comes down to these, and for your own good, you need to face that fact:

http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/matt-walsh-liberals-this-is-very-simple-you-lost-because-hillary-clinton-is-objectively-terrible/

  

Well said!...

 

 

 

 

A guy looked at my Corvette the other day and said I wonder how many people could have been fed for the money that sports car cost.

I replied I am not sure, it fed a lot of families in Bowling Green, Kentucky who built it, it fed the people who make the tires, it fed the people who made the components that went into it, it fed the people in the copper mine who mined the copper for the wires, it fed people in Decatur IL. at Caterpillar who make the trucks that haul the copper ore. It fed the trucking people who hauled it from the plant to the dealer and fed the people working at the dealership and their families. BUT,... I have to admit, I guess I really don't know how many people it fed.

That is the difference between capitalism and welfare mentality. When you buy something, you put money in people's pockets, and give them dignity for their skills.

When you give someone something for nothing, you rob them of their dignity and self worth.

Capitalism is freely giving your money in exchange for something of value.

Socialism is taking your money against your will and shoving something down your throat that you never asked for.

I've decided I can't be politically correct anymore. (I never was, actually)