Saturday, May 18, 2013

One Citizen Speaking... 


ALL YOU LOUD-MOUTHED FEMINISTS: WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU! WHY ARE YOU NOT PROTESTING A WOMAN GANG-RAPED BY MUSLIMS AND THEN JAILED UNDER SHARIA LAW

Posted: 17 May 2013 09:21 PM PDT

Have you all noticed that the loud-mouthed militant feminists refuse to go to their aid of their sisters when it comes to protesting the abhorrent civil rights of women under sharia law? This is the march and protest crowd that refuses to march and protest in Muslim countries where women are routinely and ritualistically killed, mutilated, tortured, and rapes as part of a corrupt legal system that denies that women have basic civil rights.

Australian Alicia Gali took a job in the UAE at Starwood, one of the world’s biggest hotel chains. However, while using her laptop one day in the hotel’s staff bar, her drink was spiked.  What took place next was a nightmare. She awoke to being brutally raped by three of her colleagues. Gali was able to take herself to a local hospital. However, because of Sharia laws there in the UAE, she was seen as the criminal, not the men who raped her. Under Sharia, if the perpetrators do not confess and there are not four Muslim male witnesses, there cannot be a conviction of rape. Well that’s one thing, but not only was she victimized by the rapists, but then she was made a criminal under Sharia. She was charged with having illicit sex outside of marriage, and then put in a filthy jail for eight months. Read more at: Sharia Law: Woman Gang-Raped By Muslims Then Jailed 8 Months Because They Were Not Her Husband : Freedom Outpost

Bottom line …

All you harpies that talk the talk: STFU until you start walking the walk. No wonder Rush Limbaugh refers to them as the Feminazis at  NAG.

According to the Urban Dictionary …

A feminist is someone who supports womens' rights. Simple as that. Thinks girls in poorer countries should go to school, is opposed to those music videos that consist of like, three minutes of boob shots, etc. Equality is cool, guys. Feminism is cool.

A feminazi is not a feminist. Feminists believe in equal rights for us, feminazis just make us look stupid. Feminazis believe that all men are idiots, wearing a bra is a symbol of oppression (personally I find bras comfortable), shaving our legs is apparently showing that we GIVE INTO MALE PRESSURE TO BE ATTRACTIVE HOLY SHIT, snowmen must be called "snowpeople", and that any song that mentions a girl is supporting rape or whatever. Is apparently against sexism, making them a hugefuckinghypocrite.
A feminazi is a sexist. A feminist is a supporter of womens' rights. <Source>

-- steve

BLINDNESS ON BENGHAZI AND THE ISLAMIC THREAT: HILLARY CLINTON TO RECEIVE THE "HELEN KELLER" AWARD

Posted: 17 May 2013 09:07 PM PDT

You cannot make this stuff up. Hillary Clinton will be honored with the Helen Keller Humanitarian Award in recognition of her tireless dedication to improving food and nutrition security, enhancing the health of tens of millions of women and children around the world …

The Spirit of Helen Keller Gala will take place onWednesday, May 22, 2013 at Christie’s in New York City.  The evening will begin at 6:00pm with cocktails, followed by a seated dinner and dynamic live auction. We are thrilled to announce that Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will accept the Helen Keller Humanitarian Award in recognition of her tireless dedication to improving food and nutrition security, enhancing the health of tens of millions of women and children around the world.  This year, we will also present longtime Trustee and devoted HKI advocate Kate Ganz with the Spirit of Helen Keller Award and generous HKI supporter Lions Clubs International with the Helen Keller Visionary Award.  Christopher Burge, Honorary Chair of Christie’s, will serve as our Gala Honorary Chair.  Source:Spirit of Helen Keller Gala - Helen Keller Int'l

To connect Hillary Clinton’s name with that of Helen Keller is a travesty …

Helen Keller was born in Tuscumbia, Alabama, in 1880. When she was only 19 months old, she contracted a fever that left her blind and deaf. When she was almost seven years old, her parents engaged Anne Mansfield Sullivan to be her tutor. With dedication, patience, courage and love, Miss Sullivan was able to evoke and help develop the child's enormous intelligence.

Helen Keller quickly learned to read and write, and began to speak by the age of 10. When she was 20, she entered Radcliffe College, with Miss Sullivan at her side to spell textbooks – letter by letter – into her hand. Four years later, Radcliffe awarded Helen Keller a Bachelor’s degree magna cum laude.

After graduation, Helen Keller began her life's work of helping blind and deaf-blind people. She appeared before state and national legislatures and international forums, traveled around the world to lecture and to visit areas with a high incidence of blindness, and wrote numerous books and articles. She met every U.S. president from Grover Cleveland to Lyndon Johnson, and played a major role in focusing the world's attention on the problems of the blind and the need for preventive measures. <Source>

Bottom line …

Hillary Clinton will receive a prestigious award for doing NOTHING. It was the American taxpayer’s money that was spent by elected officials acting in the name of “We the People.” It really pisses me off that blowhard ideologues like Hillary Clinton collect acclaim and awards for doing their damn job – and, in Hillary Clinton’s case – a piss-poor effort at that.

So, if anything, I will continue to hold Helen Keller in high esteem and be politically incorrect and say that the only reason that Hillary Clinton should get this award is because she has been blind and deaf on so many critical issues of international importance. In essence, enjoying a worldwide tour of foreign dignitaries to feather her future political nest or possible to drum-up business for Clinton’s various enterprises. Especially since it was revealed that her constant traveling companion, Huma Abedin, was engaged in undisclosed commercial activities while working for Hillary Clinton and the Department of State.

Perhaps it is time for our elected officials to accept all awards in the name of the United States of America Citizens who pay the freight for the apparent generosity of elected officials.

-- steve

CRAZY PROGRESSIVE POLITICS -- DHS: MORE AFRAID OF RIGHT-WING "EXTREMISTS" WHO VOTE THAN MUSLIM TERRORISTS WHO KILL?

Posted: 17 May 2013 07:53 PM PDT

It seems logical that the progressives would be more worried about conservatives who can expose their wrongdoing and vote them out of office than they would real terrorists who are likely to kill a relatively few number of people in the United States.

Therefore, one must ask what political influences have coerced our Department of Homeland Security to show great deference to Muslim activists who want to implement Sharia law in the United States over those who are demanding that politicians and the government uphold their oath of office to preserve, protect and defend the United States Constitution? Could it be that the progressives are willing to abide a pro-Muslim president and his fellow travels just so long as the progressives can use the “useful idiot” in office to advance their own socialist agenda? It seems the most likely explanation for what we are seeing. Pro-Muslim groups being given a pass – even when there are demonstrable links to terrorism and foreign sovereign states – while conservative groups are being persecuted and prosecuted.

Extremism and Radicalization Branch?

It is apparent from an examination of the present administration and the activities of the Congressional Black Caucus, that there are any number of overt race-baiters who owe their positions and professional lives to racial discord – much of it generated internally by those who continue to view everything through their self-serving prism of race. Creating racial discord when none exists in order to continue their pattern and practice of profiting off their race-baiting behavior. So it does not surprise me when the government appears to have an “extremism and radicalization branch” with a radical and racial viewpoint. The real drivers of racial discord are dividers, not uniters, for the sole purpose of gaining and maintaining political power through the use of disaffected coalitions of segmentable classes who are promised that “their grievances” shall be addressed in return for their votes and financial support.

Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment (April 7, 2009)

This product is one of a series of intelligence assessments published by the Extremism and Radicalization Branch to facilitate a greater understanding of the phenomenon of violent radicalization in the United States. The information is provided to federal, state, local, and tribal counterterrorism and law enforcement officials so they may effectively deter, prevent, preempt, or respond to terrorist attacks against the United States. Federal efforts to influence domestic public opinion must be conducted in an overt and transparent manner, clearly identifying United States Government sponsorship.

The DHS/Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) has no specific information that domestic rightwing* terrorists are currently planning acts of violence, but rightwing extremistsmay be gaining new recruits by playing on their fears about several emergent issues. The economic downturn and the election of the first African American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment.

Perceptions on Poverty and Radicalization

Scholars and experts disagree over poverty’s role in motivating violent radicalization or terrorist activity. High unemployment, however, has the potential to lead to alienation, thus increasing an individual’s susceptibility to extremist ideas. According to a 2007 study from the German Institute for Economic Research, there appears to be a strong association between a parent’s unemployment status and the formation of rightwing extremist beliefs in their children—specifically xenophobia and antidemocratic ideals.

 <Source>

Let’s review:

One, speaking about economic downturns, poverty, and the lack of opportunities – one might want to take a look at the inner cities, controlled by democrats for decades, where there are few decent opportunities, gang violence and drugs are prevalent, and there is a high proportion of individuals who may have been exposed to radicalization in the prison population; affiliating with violent prison gangs as a matter of everyday survival.

Two, speaking about undemocratic ideas, one must note that Black Liberation Theology, as taught by radical activists like President Barack Obama’s mentor, Jeremiah Wright, have their roots in international socialism/communism and are often linked with anti-America, anti-White, anti-Jew sentiments. Providing the same type of precursor conditions to radicalization on the left as on the right.

And, three, if the government were about governing ALL the people, we would not be seeing a document concentrating on one side of the political spectrum, but a even-handed, fair-minded document concentrating on the problems of radicalization wherever and whenever it is found.

Rightwing extremists have capitalized on the election of the first African American president, and are focusing their efforts to recruit new members, mobilize existing supporters, and broaden their scope and appeal through propaganda, but they have not yet turned to attack planning.

The current economic and political climate has some similarities to the 1990s when rightwing extremism experienced a resurgence fueled largely by an economic recession, criticism about the outsourcing of jobs, and the perceived threat to U.S. power and sovereignty by other foreign powers.  <Source>

You would have to be blind not to see the clear and present danger our flawed immigration system has produced. Whereby foreign nationals, both legal and illegal, have changed the demographics of California by mass immigration without mass assimilation. One need only look to Europe to see the same pattern being played out with Muslim immigration patterns. Forming dense communities which then demand political representation and their own cultural norms be obeyed. Sometimes yielding to a rise in cultural thugocracy and the exclusion of duly constituted law enforcement agencies.

It appears that some groups are more equal than others …

The Department of Homeland Security, which under Secretary Janet Napolitano has shown a keen interest in monitoring and warning about outspoken conservatives, takes a very different approach in monitoring political Islamists, according to a 2011 memo on protecting the free speech rights of pro-Shariah Muslim supremacists.

In a checklist obtained by The Daily Caller entitled “Countering Violent Extremism Dos and Don’ts” the DHS’s Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties notifies local and national law enforcement officials that it is Obama administration policy to consider specifically Islamic criticism of the American system of government legitimate.

The advice of the Dos and Don’ts list is far more conciliatory. “Don’t use training that equates radical thought, religious expression, freedom to protest, or other constitutionally-protected activity, including disliking the U.S. government without being violent,” the manual’s authors write in a section on training being “sensitive to constitutional values.”

The manual, which was produced by an inter-agency working group from DHS and the National Counterterrorism Center, advises, “Trainers who equate the desire for Sharia law with criminal activity violate basic tenets of the First Amendment.”

Read more:http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/17/homeland-security-guidelines-advise-deference-to-pro-sharia-muslim-supremacists/

Disliking your government is suspicious if you are on the right, but perfectly normal and acceptable if you are an Islamic extremist.

The Constitution is not a suicide pact and political correctness is not a solution to combatting terror …

Enough! No more of this hyper-partisan bullshit. I don’t care if they are white supremacists, Black Muslims, or green Martians – they need to abide by the Constitution of the United States and sanctioned should they decide to overthrow the government by violent means.

Bottom line …

There will always be someone who is more disadvantaged than their neighbor. Unfortunately, today’s politicians believe that they can gain or maintain power more easily by managing scarcity (as per socialistic practices) and pitting the classes against each other than growing the economy and watching a rising tide lift all boats. The real problem in America is not the right-wing nor the left-wing, it is the corrupt politicians who use whatever grievances are at hand, whether real or imagined, to pursue their own political agenda. Left by themselves, most people embrace their neighbors and neighborhoods – forming a sense of community. Until political agitators appear to convince certain segments of the population that they are disadvantaged by “the man.”

If one wants to see the process of radicalization and alienation in real time, one needs to look at Barack Obama’s mentor, to see the hate pouring out of his system and infecting his flock. It doesn’t matter much to DHS that this man is every bit as dangerous as the local Imam preaching jihad.

The real bottom line is that we need to hold our politicians and government to account. To call them on their own overt racism and prejudices when they attempt to tell us that the threat exists mainly on the right – and totally ignore the threat of radical Islam or the potential violence from a large influx of foreign influences. This is not being xenophobic, but understanding the risks posed by those who do not embrace the American “melting pot” culture and who demand that there be city markers saying designating ethnic enclaves within a much larger and impersonal city.

No more corruption. There are threats on the right and the left … but be honest enough to address all of the threats to America and her citizens. Or resign your job and move to the country of your choice.

-- steve

No comments:

Post a Comment

Featured Post

by Jm Moran 2025-11-12T13:45:57.000Z from Facebook via IFTTT from Facebook via IFTTT