Saturday, January 12, 2013

A letter to the Editor in today's Fort Myers paper makes a good point, which I shall paraphrase....

In the recent election, 21 of 22 incumbent senators were re-elected, and 353 of 373 incumbent members of the House were re-elected.

Thus, the American people have re-elected 94 percent of the incumbents who were running for re-election to an institution that has an approval rating of about 9 percent.

This indicates, as an electorate, we are a nation of idiots. We are now stuck with the useless, dysfunctional government that we deserve.

If They Come for Your Guns, Do You Have a Responsibility to Fight?

Posted on January 3, 2013by Dean Garrison

I feel a tremendous responsibility to write this article though I am a little apprehensive. Thinking about the possibility of rising up against our own government is a frightening thing for many of us. I am not Johnny Rambo and I will be the first to admit that I do not want to die. The reason I feel compelled to write this, however, is simply because I don’t think the average American is equipped with the facts. I feel that a lot of American citizens feel like they have no choice but to surrender their guns if the government comes for them. I blame traditional media sources for this mass brainwash and I carry the responsibility of all small independent bloggers to tell the truth. So my focus today is to lay out your constitutional rights as an American, and let you decide what to do with those rights.

About a month ago I let the “democracy” word slip in a discussion with a fellow blogger. I know better. Americans have been conditioned to use this term. It’s not an accurate term and it never has been a correct term to describe our form of government. The truth is that the United States of America is a constitutional republic. This is similar to a democracy because our representatives are selected by democratic elections, but ultimately our representatives are required to work within the framework of our constitution. In other words, even if 90% of Americans want something that goes against our founding principles, they have no right to call for a violation of constitutional rights.

If you are religious you might choose to think of it this way… Say that members of your congregation decide that mass fornication is a good thing. Do they have the right to change the teachings of your God? The truth is the truth. It doesn’t matter how many people try to stray from it. Did I just compare our founders to God? In a way I did, but please note that I am not trying to insult anyone. For the purpose of the American Government our constitution and founders who wrote it are much like God is to believers. It is the law. It is indisputable.

Our founders did not want a “democracy” for they feared a true democracy was just as dangerous as a monarchy. The founders were highly educated people who were experienced in defending themselves against tyranny. They understood that the constitution could protect the people by limiting the power of anyone to work outside of it much better than a pure system of popularity. A system of checks and balances was set up to help limit corruption of government and also the potential for an “immoral majority” developing within the American People. We have forgotten in this country that we are ultimately ruled by a constitution.

Why is a democracy potentially just as dangerous as a monarchy? Let’s look at something that Benjamin Franklin said because it answers that question more fully and succinctly than I can.

Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. -Benjamin Franklin

Even 230+ years ago our founders were perceptive enough to realize that democracy was a dangerous form of government. How so? Because the citizens of a country can become just as corrupt as any government. We have seen evidence of this throughout history. Ask Native Americans and African-Americans if this population can become corrupt.

I think in 2012 we are seeing evidence of what Franklin was trying to tell us. Just because a majority of people may support certain ideas it does not mean that those ideas are just. In simple terms, just because most Americans love our president and voted for him, it does not mean that he has the power to go against our constitutional rights.

Next I’d like to review the text of the second amendment. It is very clear. This is the law of this land. So when Senator Feinstein or President Obama talk about taking your guns, you need to think about something. Are they honoring their sworn oath to uphold the constitution?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

This is a pretty clear statement. The fact is that it took 232 years for the Supreme Court to even rule on this amendment because it has never been successfully challenged. In 2008 a case of Columbia v. Heller the Supreme Court ruled that a handgun ban in Washington D.C. was unconstitutional. One also has to take this into consideration. The Supreme Court supports your right to own guns. If you want to research this decision further you can start here.

For those who try to debate the spirit of the 2nd amendment, they are truly no different from people who will try to take Biblical quotes out of context to try to support their immoral decisions. The founders were very clear on the intent of the 2nd amendment. Let me share a few quick quotes here:

The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. -Thomas Jefferson

Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence … From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to insure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable . . . the very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference – they deserve a place of honor with all that is good. -George Washington

The Constitution shall never be construed….to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms. -Samuel Adams

I could find hundreds of quotes like these. This country was built on the right to bear arms. It was built on the rights of an individual to bear arms, regardless of what his government or neighbor happened to think. This is crystal clear. Ironically the people who voice their opinions against this right have their free speech protected by your guns. Without guns in this country, all other amendments become null and void, simply because “We the People” will lose our power of enforcement.

We need to keep this in mind as our “representatives” try to push gun bans. I don’t care if 99% of people are in support of gun bans (which is far from the case), it is a violation of our constitutional rights, plain and simple.

A constitutional republic protects the rights of the individual even when their ideas are very much in the minority. If I were the only person in America who believed in the 2nd amendment, I would still be within my rights to call upon it. You would all think I was insane and possibly celebrate if I was gunned down, but in the end I would be the only true American among us.

Our framers were very clear on this. If my government comes to take my guns, they are violating one of my constitutional rights that is covered by the 2nd amendment.

It is not my right, at that point, but my responsibility to respond in the name of liberty. What I am telling you is something that many are trying to soft sell, and many others have tried to avoid putting into print, but I am going to say it. The time for speaking in code is over.

If they come for our guns then it is our constitutional right to put them six feet under. You have the right to kill any representative of this government who tries to tread on your liberty. I am thinking about self-defense and not talking about inciting a revolution. Re-read Jefferson’s quote. He talks about a “last resort.” I am not trying to start a Revolt, I am talking about self-defense. If the day for Revolution comes, when no peaceful options exist, we may have to talk about that as well. None of us wants to think about that, but please understand that a majority can not take away your rights as an American citizen. Only you can choose to give up your rights.

Congress could pass gun ban legislation by a 90%+ margin and it just would not matter. I think some people are very unclear on this. This is the reason we have a Supreme Court, and though I do not doubt that the Supreme Court can also become corrupt, in 2008 they got it right. They supported the constitution. It does not matter what the majority supports because America is not a democracy. A constitutional republic protects the rights of every single citizen, no matter what their “elected servants” say. A majority in America only matters when the constitution is not in play.

I just wrote what every believer in the constitution wants to say, and what every constitutional blogger needs to write. The truth of the matter is that this type of speech is viewed as dangerous and radical or subversive, and it could gain me a world of trouble that I do not want. It is also the truth. To make myself clear I will tell you again. If they come for your guns it is your right to use those guns against them and to kill them. You are protected by our constitution.

Most of the articles I am reading on the subject are trying to give you clues without just coming out and saying it. I understand that because certain things in this country will get you on a list that you don’t want to be on. I may well be on that list. This blog is small and growing so I may not be there yet, but I have dreams. I also have my own list of subversives and anyone who attempts to deny my constitutional rights is on that list.

I am not the “subversive” here, it is the political representatives who are threatening to take away my inalienable rights. If they come to take my guns and I leave a few of them wounded or dead, and I somehow survive, I have zero doubt that I will spend a long time in prison and may face an execution. But I would much rather be a political prisoner than a slave.

If I go down fighting then I was not fighting to harm these human beings. I was simply defending my liberty and yours. It is self-defense and it is what our country was built on. We won our freedom in self-defense. We would not be ruled by a tyrannical government in the 1770′s and we will not be ruled in 2012 by a tyrannical government. There is no difference.

This is a case of right and wrong. As of now the 2nd amendment stands. It has never been repealed. If Feinstein or Barack have a problem with the constitution then they should be removed from office. They are not defending the constitution which they have sworn an oath to protect. It is treasonous to say the least. They would likely say the same about me, but I have the constitution, the founders, and the supreme court on my side. They only have their inflated egos.

I am not writing this to incite people. I am writing this in hopes that somehow I can make a tiny difference. I have no idea how many of my neighbors have the will to defend their constitutional rights. 2%? 20%? I am afraid that 20% is a high number, unfortunately. When push comes to shove many people may give up and submit to being ruled. I believe that our government is banking on this.

What I do know is that this country was founded by people who had balls the size of Texas and Patriotic Americans take shit off of no one, especially our own government. For evidence of that, you might research the Revolutionary War. My question is how many Patriots are left?

I would hope that our officials come to realize that, regardless of our numbers, we still exist because they are calling Patriotic Americans to action. They are making us decide if we want to die free or submit to their rule. I can not tell you where you should stand on that. I do know that it may make the difference between living a life of freedom or slavery.

You must start thinking about this because I believe that the day is coming soon and I personally believe it has already been planned. Not all conspiracy theories are hogwash. They may throw down the gauntlet soon and my suggestion is that you prepare yourself to react.

I mean no disrespect to our elected officials but they need to understand that “We the People” will not be disarmed. If they proceed then it is they that are provoking us and we will act accordingly. We are within our rights to do so.

For those who are in support of taking the guns, you need to ask yourself a very important question, and I am not just talking about the politicians, because if you support them, you have chosen your side.

Are you willing to die to take my guns?



A veteran is someone who, at one point in his life, wrote a blank check made payable to 'The United States of America' for an amount of 'up to and including my life.' That is Honor, and there are way too many people in this country who no longer understand it.' anonymous



May God Bless Our Troops And our Veterans.



God Bless America



In God We Trust!



Guns Save Lives


Kentucky Sheriff Says His Office Would Oppose Any Gun Confiscation Laws
White House Playing Down “Assault Weapons” Ban, Pushing Universal Background Checks, Magazine Limits
Robber Armed With Cattle Prod (Yeah a Cattle Prod) Stopped by Store Clerk With Gun
Kentucky Sheriff Says His Office Would Oppose Any Gun Confiscation Laws
Posted: 11 Jan 2013 12:24 PM PST
According to RedState.com, Jackson County Sheriff Denny Peyman has some advice for federal officials attempting to confiscate legal guns held by citizens in his jurisdiction: “go ahead, make my day.” “My office will not comply with any federal action which violates the United States Constitution or the Kentucky Constitution which I swore to uphold,” Peyman [...] Related posts:
Four Colorado Sheriffs Pledge to Never Take Part in Federal Gun Confiscation.
[Video] Sheriff Scott Berry on National Television (Fox Business) – Nails It!
Dana Safety Supply Stops Selling Semi Auto Rifles to Civilians So Sheriff Pulls His Business

White House Playing Down “Assault Weapons” Ban, Pushing Universal Background Checks, Magazine Limits
Posted: 11 Jan 2013 11:48 AM PST
The New York Times has published an article implying that the White House may be moving away from promoting an all out assault weapons ban. However the White House is possibly looking at putting its weight behind magazine capacity limits and universal background checks (even for private transactions and gifts). Now is the time to [...] Related posts:
Why an Assault Weapons Ban is Still Unlikely
White House Responds to Piers Morgan Deportation Petition
URGENT: New Assault Weapons Ban Language – It Affects YOUR Guns

Robber Armed With Cattle Prod (Yeah a Cattle Prod) Stopped by Store Clerk With Gun
Posted: 11 Jan 2013 10:44 AM PST
A robber who armed himself with an unconvential weapon, a cattle prod, is now behind bars thanks to a store clerk armed with a handgun. The would be robber tried to rob a Florida convenience store using a cattle prod. The suspect shocked the clerk several times before she produced a handgun and the suspect [...] Related posts:
VA Grocery Store Clerk Shoots At, Scares Off Armed Robber
Indianapolis, IN Liquor Store Clerk Shoots, Kills Armed Robber
MI Store Clerk Shoots Knife Wielding Armed Robber in the Head


Friday, January 11, 2013

Banana ‘Super Dwarf Cavendish’ (Musa acuminata)-Logee's Greenhouses

Banana ‘Super Dwarf Cavendish’ (Musa acuminata)-Logee's Greenhouses

China sends troops to border with conflict-torn Myanmar: media | Reuters
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/11/us-china-myanmar-idUSBRE90A0FN20130111

US_CALIFORNIA_COLD_SNAP...Global LOL Warming!


News from The Associated Press
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_CALIFORNIA_COLD_SNAP?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2013-01-11-04-34-51

O Nominates Lewis and Hagel?


"He can't be serious."

That's what I thought this week when I saw President Obama's nominations to lead the U.S. Department of Defense and the Department of Treasury.

In former Senator Chuck Hagel (for Defense) and White House Chief of Staff Jack Lew (for Treasury), the president named two individuals who should raise serious concerns for Americans who care about our nation's security, but most especially our economic strength. (A third nominee, John Brennan to head the Central Intelligence Agency, was more reassuring - would that the president had nominated equally capable leaders for Defense and Treasury.)

Concerned Veterans for America (CVA) is on record opposing the Hagel and Lew nominations. You can read why at our website:

Hagel: Wrong Man at the Wrong Time

Lew: More of the Same Failed Economic Policies
These choices by President Obama make it clear that he has no desire to engage in a meaningful and serious discussion of what is required to restore economic prosperity and meet the security challenges of a dangerous world. Once again, the president missed an opportunity to get serious about our national debt, the need for spending reform, and the strength of our military. Plain and simple - he is not serious about reform.

Check out our website for more and to learn how you can get involved.


Sincerely,

Pete Hegseth
CEO, Concerned Veterans for America

CVA Statement: Hagel is "Wrong Man at Wrong Time" for Defense VIEW
CVA Statement on Nomination of John Brennan as CIA Director VIEW
CVA Opposes the Nomination of Jack Lew to Serve as Treasury Secretary VIEW

Featured Post

RT @anti_commie32: Keep up the great work!!! https://t.co/FIAnl1hxwG

RT @anti_commie32: Keep up the great work!!! https://t.co/FIAnl1hxwG — Joseph Moran (@JMM7156) May 2, 2023 from Twitter https://twitter....