Wednesday, September 18, 2013

One Citizen Speaking...



AGAIN, IT'S NOT GUN CONTROL, IT'S CRAZY CONTROL ....

Posted: 17 Sep 2013 08:41 PM PDT

Once again, the radical progressive socialist democrats like the dishonest Diane Feinstein are jumping up-and-down calling for disarming all law-abiding citizens in the wake of another shooting rampage by a crazy person. Rather than admit that these things will happen time-to-time in any population of hundreds of millions, the radicals want to propose a draconian solution that creates an even larger pool of victims. Think about it, what happens if the citizen population is disarmed and a crazy military person grabs a handful of grenades or an automatic weapon and goes on a rampage … who will they blame then? The crazy or the system that did not detect and deter the crazy?

It is about time that America wakes up. There is evil and craziness in the world and nobody, especially not a corrupt and incompetent government, can protect each and every citizen. It is also about time to demand that the progressive mainstream media restrain themselves from the 24/7 wall-to-wall, minute-by-minute coverage of emerging events. Especially those which lead to false assumptions and conclusions. It is the media that amplifies these local events into “national tragedies” to be exploited for political purpose. Enough. 

According to the Associated Press …

Officials: Gunman treated for mental health issues

U.S. law enforcement officials are telling The Associated Press that the Navy contractor identified as the gunman in the mass shootings at the Washington Navy Yard had been suffering a host of serious mental issues, including paranoia and a sleep disorder. He also had been hearing voices in his head, the officials said.

Aaron Alexis, 34, had been treated since August by the Veterans Administration for his mental problems, the officials said. They spoke on condition of anonymity because the criminal investigation in the case was continuing. The Navy had not declared him mentally unfit, which would have rescinded a security clearance that Alexis had from his earlier time in the Navy Reserves. Family members told investigators that Alexis was being treated for his mental issues. Source: News from The Associated Press

Bottom line …

While you cannot control what crazy people do, you can restrict them from purchasing weapons. So why is the gun control crowd not calling for an FBI database of psychologically-impaired people who are on psychotropic medicines? Why is the gun control crowd not calling for an FBI database of everyone arrested for domestic violence or alcohol- and drug-related misbehavior? Where is the database of criminals and others who should be denied weapons? Where is the database of original weapons charges – not the the charges that were reduced in a plea bargain? And, where is the database of disturbed veterans?

Even if you register handguns or any other weapons, what does that mean if there is no database of people ineligible to own weapons. 

Oh silly me! They don’t want to keep the guns out of the hands of those who shouldn’t own them, they want the guns out of the hands of everybody – especially those who might object forcibly when confronted with government tyranny.

It has never been about gun control – or even crime control – it is about grabbing and keeping political power.

-- steve

Why the progressive socialist democrat mainstream media loves Meghan McCain

Posted: 17 Sep 2013 08:00 PM PDT

Listening to Meghan McCain makes it readily apparent that she is a member of the lucky sperm club … a position of privilege and perks based upon nothing other than her father is Senator John McCain, former “war hero” who managed to spin his grueling experience in Viet Nam into a position as a political powerhouse. Even though he was a self-professed enemy collaborator and possibly psychologically unfit to hold a political office.

So why does the progressive socialist democrat mainstream media love Meghan McCain?

  1. She is a member of the lucky sperm club and her father is more progressive democrat than he is a Republican. If you doubt the aisle-hopping proclivities of McCain the elder, witness McCain-Feingold (campaign finance reform), McCain-Kennedy (amnesty for illegal aliens), and McCain-Lieberman (global warming).
  2. She is blond (faux) and not too unattractive – perfect for the low-information voters who watch television.
  3. She is republican and routinely proves that she walks in her father’s progressive socialist democrat footsteps.
  4. She is none too bright and is prone to sound a little like Joe Biden on a bad hair day.

And, there are some in the progressive socialist media who are not too pleased when she doesn’t get the story exactly right  … 

Why Meghan McCain Is the Worst -- John McCain's daughter knows little about history or politics -- but keeps getting platforms to spout her ignorance.

Millennials, the generation that came after Gen-Y and is nebulously responsible for the success of Twitter, debit cards and *NSYNC, are as easy to mock as they are to use as a marketing metric.

And, until I saw “Raising McCain,” I had thought millennials got a bad rap.

The series, which debuted on the new network Pivot TV Saturday, is a combination talk show and unscripted series — half “The View,” half “Sarah Palin’s Alaska.” It follows the exploits of one Meghan McCain, the daughter of the current U.S. senator from Arizona and one-time presidential nominee John McCain; she alternates between interviewing her guest and showing a slice of what it is like to be the daughter of a U.S. senator who lost the presidency in a landslide. She has been given 30 minutes a week on an aspirant cable network to prove that she has nothing to say.

Meghan McCain is the epitome of what it is to be not a millennial — a group of individuals of multifarious racial and class backgrounds — but the media perception of a millennial. The media wished that millennials, as a group, could be self-absorbed, entitled and unimaginative; Meghan McCain rose to the challenge.

Prior to the release of her current series, Meghan McCain was a columnist for the Daily Beast; her columns for the site, for which her last piece ran shortly after the last presidential election, included such pieces as “Yes, I Wear Fake Hair” and The GOP’s House Hottie.”She interviewedSnooki, too!

Following in the steps of another progressive socialist democrat …

On its face, nepotism is not worth crying over; it’s the unfortunate way of the world. Most Arkansas schoolchildren don’t end up profiled in Vogue and helping to run global foundations, and yet Chelsea Clinton seems a serious-minded person. Good for her! (Other such cases of nepotism are much more frustrating — but at least, unlike McCainLuke Russerthas stuck with his position as an MSNBC on-air personality!) And yet McCain’s apparent belief that she deserves a seat at the table — that her thoughts, such as they are, ought to drive the national conversation — shocks the conscience. It is the hauteur that only a millennial could possibly possess.

I recognize that this reads as harsh. But the second episode of “Raising McCain,” which I have seen, features a lengthy discussion of feminism, which McCain dismisses as irrelevant to the women of today. The episode, already savaged by the New Yorker, features McCain arguing that feminism out-of-hand is irrelevant to the women of today. If you want to be sexy and fun, McCain alleges, feminism is an outmoded model. “Who doesn’t like getting attention from the opposite sex?” she asks.

Read more at Why Meghan McCain Is the Worst | Alternet.

Bottom line …

m2

Sometimes the progressive socialist media does get it right. But then only to point out how stupid republicans and their spawn might be. It is time that the republican party disinvited unwelcome guests – like progressive socialist democrats – and quit diluting whatever branding they might have left.

I wish the Meghan McCain would start learning about conservatism and possibly start behaving like a republican instead of the ill-informed RINO (Republican In Name Only) she appears to be. At the present time, her primary asset is that she is more telegenic than Chelsea Clinton – but given Chelsea’s accomplishments, way behind the game.

-- steve

Guns Save Lives


Link to Guns Save Lives

Concealed Carrier in Texas Shoots Two Car Jackers, Kills One

Posted: 17 Sep 2013 12:34 PM PDT

A Houston area resident, with a concealed weapons permit was using the Red Box DVD Kiosk outside of an area McDonald’ last week. The man was then approached by two men, identified as Melvin Frederick Austin and Elijah Alexander Mims. Both men were armed with handguns and demanded the man’s car keys and cell phone. […]

AR Homeowner Shoots and Kills Intruder to Protect Wife and Two Preschool Age Children

Posted: 17 Sep 2013 09:46 AM PDT

One of the most terrifying thoughts for most people is knowing that your young children are in a home with a potentially violent intruder. That’s exactly what happened to one family in Arkansas last week. A man identified as William Anthony Wilson, age 27, forced his way through the backdoor of a home in Ashdown, […]

Multiple Media Sources Reporting Navy Shooter NOT Armed With AR-15 When He Entered Yard

Posted: 17 Sep 2013 08:37 AM PDT

Yesterday we saw that NBC News was reporting that the suspected Navy shooter was armed only with a shotgun when he entered the Navy yard and may have gained access to a handgun and possibly an AR-15 along the way. Now we have even more reports, some saying that an AR-15 wasn’t used AT ALL. […]

Dianne Feinstein, I'm a Libtard,  Calls for More Federal Gun Control Following Navy Yard Shooting

Posted: 16 Sep 2013 11:25 PM PDT

Well, the Senate’s most vocal anti-gun advocate didn’t wast any time putting a tragedy to work for her political agenda. The senior Senator from California, Dianne Feinstein, yesterday called for a renewed federal push for more gun control before we even have all of the facts of the recent Navy Yard shooting in Washington DC. […]

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

Military Bases are "gun free zones" thanks to Billy , the zipper,Clinton...

WHEN DID MILITARY BASES BECOME ‘GUN-FREE ZONES’?

Tuesday, September 17, 2013


It hasn’t always been the case that only MPs can carry firearms on U.S. military bases. A mere twenty years ago, “gun free zones” made their way to these facilities under the watch of President Bill Clinton.
According to a Washington Times editorial written days after the Nov. 5, 2009 attack on soldiers at Fort Hood, one of Clinton’s “first acts upon taking office… was to disarm U.S. soldiers on military bases.”
Clinton’s actions birthed Army regulations “forbidding military personnel from carrying their personal firearms and making it almost impossible for commanders to issue firearms to soldiers in the U.S. for personal protection.”

 
216 


21 

2 



Print Friendly and PDF
This entry was posted in Email and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

Featured Post

by Jm Moran 2025-11-12T13:45:57.000Z from Facebook via IFTTT from Facebook via IFTTT