WATCH: Krauthammer: ‘Mainstream Media’ Won’t Be Interested in Benghazi ‘Cover-up of a Cover-up’
Commentator Charles Krauthammer challenged the mainstream media to report on documents released this week directly tying then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice’s Benghazi talking points to instructions in an email from a White House official.
“The mainstream media are going to say, ‘Oh, it’s so complicated,’ and they’re not going to look into this and without it it’s going to be quite a struggle,” Krauthammer said last night on Fox’s “Special Report.”
He was referring to emails obtained through a lawsuit by Judicial Watch that reveal senior White House official Ben Rhodes instructed that Rice blame an “Internet video”—not a policy failure—for the terrorist attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that left the U.S. ambassador and three others dead.
The email Krauthammer called “the smoking document” implicating the White House is dated three days after the attack on Sept. 11, 2012.
One goal of Rice’s appearances Sept. 16 on all five Sunday morning talk shows was “To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy,” according to Rhodes’ email.
Rice is now Obama’s national security adviser. Rhodes, a deputy national security adviser at the time, continues on as Rice’s deputy for strategic communications and speechwriting.
Krauthammer condemned the Obama administration for shifting responsibility for the sanitized talking points to intelligence officials.
>>> Read More: New Evidence Shows White House Role in Changing Benghazi Talking Points
“Now we know from [Mike] Morrell, who testified under oath—he at the time was the deputy director at the CIA—that he never brought up the video, so it didn’t come from him. That leaves only the White House and the State Department,” Krauthammer said.
“I just don’t know if there’s going to be any interest in the mainstream media,” Krauthammer said, adding:
The fact that it was redacted when the documents were asked for [by Congress] and only revealed by a court order is telling you that this is a classic cover-up of a cover-up.”
This story was produced by The Foundry’s news team. Nothing here should be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of The Heritage Foundation.
Check out this Heritage video about the White House and Benghazi:
Alissa Tabirian
Ken McIntyre
Related Posts
President Obama has been on a foreign tour. How’s it going on the world stage? Probably not so well when New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd is accusing him of “whining” and “whiffing.” Dowd’s eviscerating assessment of Obama’s foreign policy is timely. “It doesn’t feel like leadership,” she said yesterday. … More
Danny Wright92p· 18 hours ago
What? Well of course there's not going to be any interest. Where have you been for the last 20 years Charles?
lovemydesignergenes· 16 hours ago
There was a photo also of a white man being tortured which was claimed as being a photo of the Ambassador (am not sure if it is him)
Anyway, the elephant in the room...was that Pres. Obama's reelection came up in 2 months.
So...Benghazi had to be quickly squashed...minimized...tamped down.
And for the many gullible, it worked.
Pres. O was reelected.
Totally Disgusted· 16 hours ago
Rochelle Fugette· 16 hours ago
Pat· 15 hours ago
Frank· 15 hours ago
Ned· 15 hours ago
Do our legislators have the guts?....
Ted· 15 hours ago
dam1953· 15 hours ago
Rob· 15 hours ago
jeff· 15 hours ago
jeff· 15 hours ago
Mikey Snot· 14 hours ago
Ron· 14 hours ago
J to the S· 14 hours ago
Doug Whaley· 14 hours ago
Dave Horne· 14 hours ago
Bush got to invade the wrong country ... and Benghazi trumps that. Is that more or less correct?
I.M.· 14 hours ago
steep· 14 hours ago
Walter Beverly· 14 hours ago
David John Francis· 14 hours ago
Joe Disgusted· 13 hours ago
jRhodes· 13 hours ago
Eliott· 12 hours ago
Jim Fuscaldo· 12 hours ago