IS THE KING OF SAUDI ARABIA IS TRYING TO GET THE UNITED STATES TO SAVE HIS KINGDOM?

One Citizen Speaking...

---

IS THE KING OF SAUDI ARABIA IS TRYING TO GET THE UNITED STATES TO SAVE HIS KINGDOM? Posted: 30 Aug 2014 02:27 PM PDT The Saudis are not our friends … There is little or no doubt in my mind that Saudi Arabia pursues an outreach program to build Mosques around the world that support the fundamentalist Wahhabist religion that is found in Saudi Arabia. Mosques that can be used to radicalize Americans and foment jihadist terror strikes within America. There is also little or doubt in my mind that Saudi Arabia’s rulers may be paying-off terrorists to avoid an attack on their Kingdom and an overthrow over their cushy lifestyles. The Struggle against Jahiliyya – Taken literally, the word Jahiliyya is a reference to a state of barbarism and ignorance. But al-Wahhab used it in a different context. In Wahhabi Islam, all societies that do not follow the true ways of Islam are considered to be in a state of Jahiliyya. All “infidels” are Jahili. Used in this context, Jahiliyya can more accurately be described as a representation of what Wahhabists consider to be the unholy, polytheistic, barbaric, corrupt, and evil state of Arabia before the coming of Islam. Jahiliyya is a representation of the culture that Mohammad fought against and destroyed with the inception of Islam. By so closely comparing their struggle against Jahiliyya with Mohammad’s fight against the polytheists of his time, Wahhabists see the struggle as one of the most holy actions they can take. (Cline; Idris; Metz, Saudi) According to al-Wahhab, it is the duty of all true Muslims to fight Jahiliyya and the Jahili. Though conversion to “true Islam” is an option, Wahhabists are permitted by their doctrine to “rob, murder, and sexually violate” Jahili (Lopez). We can find an example of Wahhabi Islam’s brutal treatment of what they consider to be Jahili in the gruesome beheadings of such people as Paul Johnson, Daniel Pearl, Nick Berg, etc.. (Cline; Idris; Metz, Saudi)  <Source> There appears to be little difference between ISIS (or ISIL) and the Wahhabists of Saudi Arabia – except for who they pledge their allegiance to. Bayah (the oath of allegiance) – According to al-Wahhab’s teachings, all Muslims must individually pledge their allegiance to a Muslim leader. As long as this leader follows the laws of Islam (as determined by Wahhabi Islam) completely, the individual must give him his unquestionable allegiance. The Wahhabist must make this pledge to ensure his redemption by God after death. The purpose of the bayah is to merge religion and politics into one, ensuring that all Muslims dedicate their lives to following a “pure” leader who upholds all the tenets of Islam while at the same time ensuring that every leader must follow the laws of Islam completely. The Muslim community is thus to become the living embodiment of God’s laws and dictates. It is the responsibility of the leader to ensure that all people who live under his control know and follow the laws of God. (Metz, Saudi) Conformity – Wahhabi Islam demands conformity. All people must dress similarly (you may notice in Saudi Arabia, most men wear the same white cloths), behave similarly, pray at the same time, use the same rituals in prayer, and speak in a similar manner. Adherence to the “true faith” is demonstrable in physical and tangible ways. The Wahhabists believe that they can judge a person’s faith by observing his actions and level of conformity to the Islamic ways. It is thus the responsibility of each Wahhabist to constantly observe his neighbors and friends in search of unholy actions and behavior. (Metz, Saudi; Mortimer) <Source> So I have basically have absolutely no trust in the King of Saudi Arabia or those politicians in our government who appear to be hiding something that every American should know about the 9/11 terrorist attack. In fact, I believe that certain Saudis were somehow complicit in providing financing and operational support for the 9/11 terrorist attack in the United States. Something that we may never know because former President George Bush (43) and now President Barack Obama refuse to declassify the 28 classified pages of the 9/11Commission Report that deals with possible foreign involvement with the 9/11 attack. It is believed that the Saudi government, either directly or indirectly, may have provided material support to the 9/11 hijackers - 15 of the 19 which were citizens of Saudi Arabia. Sen. Bob Graham: Did They Act Alone? Here is an edited transcript of the press conference held March 12 by Reps. Walter B. Jones (R-N.C.), Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.), and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), calling for declassification of the suppressed 28 pages of the Congressional 9/11 Inquiry. Also participating were representatives of the 9/11 Families United for Justice Against Terrorism. The press conference received a videotaped message from former Sen. Bob Graham of Florida, who co-chaired the Joint Congressional Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks. Good morning. I appreciate the opportunity to be a part of this conference, which is going to be discussing some of the most important issues affecting the relationships within Congress, and the Executive relationships between government and its people, and the national security of our nation. It's very significant that this conference is being held, the day after Senator Feinstein made her statements relative to the relationship between the inquiry which has been conducted by the Senate Intelligence Committee and the CIA. Because what we're going to be talking about today, raises many of the same fundamental issues. Immediately after 9/11, the leadership of the House and Senate asked the chairs of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees to do what Congress had never done in 200 years, and that is, to form a joint committee for purposes of conducting an inquiry as to what had happened in 9/11, with particular focus on the role of the United States intelligence community. We spent the better part of 15 months working on that inquiry. We had staff that represented persons who were knowledgeable in each of the intelligence communities. We had persons who had experience in the Department of Justice, in other law-enforcement-related agencies of the Federal government. We conducted hundreds of interviews, read thousands of pages of documents, and in December of 2002, produced an 800-plus-page report. That report took over six months in the declassification process, and when the report was returned in publicly releasable form, there were a number of specific redactions. There were names and places and other specific pieces of evidence which were withheld. But the most stunning thing, was that an entire chapter, 28 pages, was censored, from word one to the last word of the chapter. That chapter dealt primarily with who financed 9/11. That was a very fundamental question, because it went to an even larger question. And that is: Did those who committed that heinous attack on Sept. 11, did they act alone, or were they supported by a network of individuals? All of the people who have been in leadership positions of investigations into 9/11have come away with the feeling that it was implausible to believe that these 19 people, most of whom didn't speak English; most of whom had only been in the United States for—if any—a very brief period of time, could have carried out such a complex operation, which required completion of the planning, the practicing, and then, finally, the execution of the plot. A key part of that question of whether they acted alone or had support, related to the financing of9/11: How could these people have financed a project that was as expensive, in terms of the cost of the 19 individuals, without having some support network? That missing chapter provides evidence that would be important to answer the question: Did these people act alone? That chapter has now been censored, since the Summer of 2003, for over 10 years. Whatever reason there may have been for the initial censorship, has long since passed. At the time that we heard that it was being censored, Sen. Dick Shelby, a Republican from Alabama, who was the vice-chair of the Senate Committee, and myself as chair, both agreed that there was no reason to censor that 28-page, important chapter, for national security reasons. But here we are, 10 years later, and it continues to be censored. You may wish to read 9/11 Link To Saudi Arabia Is Topic Of 28 Redacted Pages In Government Report; Congressmen Push For Release. Why did President Bush rush to protect individual Saudis and members of the bin Laden family after the attack when no civilian aircraft in the United States were permitted to fly? Bin Laden Family 'Evacuated' From US Members of Osama bin Laden's family were allowed to fly out of the US shortly after theSeptember 11 terror attacks, a senior official has said. Even though American airspace had been shut down, the Bush administration allowed a jet to fly around the US picking up family members from 10 cities, including Los Angeles, Washington DC, Boston and Houston. Some 140 high ranking Saudi officials were also on the plane. The revelations come from former White House counter-terrorism chief Richard Clarke. He said the Bush administration sanctioned the repatriation of the family in the immediate aftermath of the attacks. 'Repatriation approved' "Somebody brought to us for approval the decision to let an airplane filled with Saudis, including members of the bin Laden family, leave the country," he told Vanity Fair magazine. Mr Clarke said he checked with FBI officials, who gave the go ahead. "So I said, 'Fine, let it happen'."  He first asked the bureau to check that no one "inappropriate" was leaving. "I have no idea if they did a good job. I'm not in any position to second guess the FBI," he said. But Dale Watson, the FBI's former head of counter-terrorism, said the Saudis "were not subject to serious interviews or interrogations". Permission to fly Federal authorities gave permission for the plane to fly. Tom Kinton, director of aviation at Boston's Logan airport, said: "We were in the midst of the worst terrorist act in history and here we were seeing an evacuation of the bin Ladens! ... I wanted to go the highest levels in Washington." Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the Saudi ambassador to the US who is said to have organised the exodus, met President George Bush on September 13, 2001, two days after the terror attacks. <Source> Now it appears that the Saudi King wants the United States to spent its blood and treasure further protecting his Kingdom … Saudi king warns West will be jihadists' next target King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia has warned that the West will be the next target of the jihadists sweeping through Syria and Iraq, unless there is "rapid" action. "If we ignore them, I am sure they will reach Europe in a month and America in another month," he said in remarks quoted on Saturday by Asharq al-Awsat daily and Saudi-backed Al-Arabiya television station. "Terrorism knows no border and its danger could affect several countries outside the Middle East," said the king who was speaking at a welcoming ceremony on Friday for new ambassadors, including a new envoy from Saudi ally the United States. The Islamic State (IS) jihadist group has prompted widespread concern as it advances in both Syria and Iraq, killing hundreds of people, including in gruesome beheadings and mass executions. Lack of action would be "unacceptable" in the face of the phenomenon, King Abdullah said. "You see how they (jihadists) carry out beheadings and make children show the severed heads in the street," he said, condemning the "cruelty" of such acts. "It is no secret to you, what they have done and what they have yet to do. I ask you to transmit this message to your leaders: 'Fight terrorism with force, reason and (necessary) speed'." Source: Saudi king warns West will be jihadists' next target - Yahoo News It seems to me that Saudi Arabia would be in more jeopardy than the west due to its location, its assets, and the general hatred of Saudis not connected with the Royal family. Bottom line … Yes, Saudi Arabia purchases a significant amount of weaponry from the United States, is a major oil-producing nation, and apparently has purchased influence with our government – especially with the Bushs and Clintons – so who is likely to demand the declassification of the 9/11 report? Who is going to demand that the Saudis pay a heavy price for the Americans who will bear the burden of saving the Kingdom from terrorism? And, I do not mean that the money or benefits flow to the politicians and special interests, but to the Treasury of the United States. I think that there should be an audit of all post-presidential actions involving the Saudis and their “contributions” to presidential libraries, foundations, and initiatives. Including funds paid to relatives and others that benefit presidents, past, current, and future. Above all – we should think hard and fast about allowing our military to protect Saudi Arabia without some form of compensation that benefits the American people. Declassifying the 28-pages so that Americans can be fully informed about what their government representatives are doing in their name. And, another reason why we cannot trust another Bush or Clinton in the White House. -- steve Related articles The Muslims riot over a cartoon, but sit idly by as Saudia Arabia turns the Mecca house of one of the Prophets wives into a public toilet Why Does the U.S. Support a Country which was FOUNDED With Terrorism? Huffington Post: ISIS Horror Explained by Saudi Wahhabism Why Does the U.S. Support Saudi Arabia, A Country Which Hosts and Finances Islamic Terrorism? ... Why Does the U.S. Support a Country which was FOUNDED With Terrorism ... and Is Still the MAIN SOURCE of Islamic Terrorism Today? You Can't Understand ISIS If You Don't Know the History of Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia does not support Islamic State terrorists - or any others Saudi king warns of terrorist threat to Europe, US

BLACK HYPOCRISY: RAISING MILLIONS FOR FOUNDATIONS THAT HONOR THUGS, BUT DENYING A POLICE OFFICER A LEGAL DEFENSE FUND? Posted: 29 Aug 2014 03:30 PM PDT There is little or no doubt in my mind that radical progressive socialist democrats are liars and hypocrites. Beyond the racial rantings of self-promoting race-baiters and race-hustlers like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, there is a whole cadre of radicals who believe that freedom of speech is a one way street where they police the content and operate the toll-booth. The idea that all sides of a position have an equal right to media exposure, to raise funds, and to make their position known appears to be abhorrent to these idiots as they demand “equality” and “fairness.” Let us consider the concerted attempt by radicals to stop a fundraising effort for the police officer who shot Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. Not only have the progressive socialist democrats and their race-hustlers like Al Sharpton tried and convicted the officer of “murdering an unarmed black teenager,” but they want to prevent the officer from defending himself against a biased array of prosecutors, including Attorney General Eric Holder, whose self-interests lie not in justice, but in self-serving racial politics. Here is an example of the type of radical, one-sided and self-serving, political actions that point to the hypocrisy of those who refuse to wait for the official grand jury report before jumping to their racist conclusions … From the radical left Alternet.com … Pressure Grows for GoFundMe to Stop Its 'Support Officer Darren Wilson' Campaign More than $400,000 has been raised on two separate GoFundMe pages for Darren Wilson, the officer whoshot unarmed Michael Brown dead on Aug. 9, sparking sharp criticism of the online crowdfunding site. To focus some of that outrage into getting GoFundMe to end the campaign,  organizers atColorOfChange.org have created a petition  demanding that the site return all money donated to the officer because it "is profiting off racially-motivated donors, some of whom are celebrating the police killing of Michael Brown." Besides GoFundMe gets a 5 percent cut from donations Wilson's supporters raise--which many consider profiting from a black teenager's death. Source:  Pressure Grows for GoFundMe to Stop Its 'Support Officer Darren Wilson' Campaign Unarmed is not synonymous with innocent or harmless … One should note that although Michael Brown was “unarmed,” he was an existential threat to the police officer. A 6’4” and 292-pounds, Brown was capable of inflicting great bodily injury and causing the death of the police officer with little more than a blow to the head or any other vital area of the officer’s anatomy. It has been suggested in media reports that Brown punched the officer in such a manner as to possibly impair both his sight and his perception. Unarmed does not equate to either innocent or harmless in the real world. As for profiting off racially-motivated donors, consider those that have declared Trayvon Martin, another thuggish black man, who met his death when he assaulted an armed Neighborhood Watch captain under suspicious circumstances. It appears that significant sums of money have been donated to the foundation that bears his name – yet, does not process the money or report to the government under that name. There is no accounting for the funds that were collected and expended – and I do not expect an accurate accounting to ever take place. Why did I mention this? Because the same lawyer, Benjamin Crump, and race-baiter, Al Sharpton, were the driving forces behind the almost canonization of Treyvon Martin. Martin, from all official and media accounts, was a wannabe gansta and possessed stolen property from a nearby residential burglary (along with a burglary tool) when confronted by school authorities. Because the school police wanted to curtail the number of black youngsters turned into the municipal police, the incident was never reported and the evidence was filed. Only during the court case did the truth come out. Race-hustler, anti-Semite Al Sharpton is Obama's Go-To Guy Anyone else find this disgraceful and immoral? Al Sharpton has a sordid history. First of all, though he uses the rubric “Reverend” to give him some degree of respectability, he never attended a seminary. He just made up the title and bestowed it upon himself. His fraud does not end there. There was the Tawana Brawley rape hoax that he orchestrated that led to race riots and severe personal damage to a policeman Sharpton tried to frame for the fraudulent rape. He has a long and disgraceful history of stoking racism against whites. Now President Obama, who invites Sharpton to official White House state dinners (wonder what foreign leaders make of Sharpton) has made him the go-to-guy to deal with the riots going on in Ferguson (cooled down-for now).  Read more   Bottom line … While it is the right of individuals and organizations to mount a campaign against any fundraising on behalf of Officer Wilson – remember that pesky innocent until proven guilty concept – it is both hypocritical and disingenuous that the effort be characterized along racial lines and suggesting that it is racism – as opposed to fairness – that motivates the donors. Let us consider that this incident would have never seen the light of day had it not been a white cop shooting a black suspect. But, it was perfect for the self-serving race-baiters, race-hustlers like Al Sharpton who are motivated by money and media attention. Not to mention the self-serving politicians like Barack Obama and his cadre of progressive socialist democrats who need to rally their black base for the upcoming November congressional election cycle. Especially in light of the decimation of black job opportunities when they clearly abandoned the blacks to pursue future political power with illegal alien Hispanics. And, especially in light of the almost daily slaughter of young black men in the inner cities governed by progressive socialist democrats. In what alternative universe would we find a corrupt, lying race-hustler and agitator like Al Sharpton serving as point-man for the White House? A man whose lies have caused death, destruction, and increased racial tensions in America. We need to throw the race-baiters, race-hustlers, and the corrupt progressive socialist democrats out of the House, the Senate, and the Presidency. Protect our Constitution and the rule of law by denying the progressive socialist democrats their “fundamental transformation of America.” -- steve

Coahuila: A Drug Summit of Z's, BLO, CJNG Juarez Cartels seeking an Alliance ???

Borderland Beat

---

Coahuila: A Drug Summit of Z's, BLO, CJNG Juarez Cartels seeking an Alliance Posted: 29 Aug 2014 06:57 PM PDT Chivis Martinez for Borderland Beat  Reforma is reporting that four major criminal organizations sought an alliance that would create a  cartel power alliance and reconfigure the entire map of drug trafficking in Mexico. Supposedly, intelligence reports from both the Mexican government and the United States revealed  that the cartels seeking a pact in common, they are; The New Generation Jalisco Cartel ,the Carrillo Fuentes organization, the Beltran Leyva Organization and Los Zetas, which operate in two-thirds the country.  What is reported is that, last June, the premier leaders of the four  organizations held a drug summit in Piedras Negras, Coahuila. Attending the meeting were;  Ruben (or Nemesio), Oseguera Cervantes, "El Mencho"  premier leader of CJNG;  Vicente Carrillo Fuentes, "El Viceroy", leader of Juarez Cartel, and Alejandro "Omar" Trevino Morales, "El Z42" visible leader of Los Zetas, along with another man identified as the "Z43". Reportedly, the only capo  who did not attend,  was Héctor Beltrán Leyva, aka "El H". However, he sent on his behalf, Fausto Isidro Meza  aka "El Chapo Isidro", he considers the most trusted and reliable person to represent the leader.     Who is Z43? The reforma article states a Z43 was present with Trevino at the meeting.  However, in 2010 David Rivera Alvarez aka " Z43" was executed.  (see English language transcript here) He was the second in command in the state of Tabasco.  Rivera had been sent to Tampico to "heat up the plaza", and had only arrived two weeks prior to being kidnapped and killed by a single gunshot.  It is uncertain who this new Z43 is but there is no doubt that a Z43 was killed in 2010. Before being shot he admitted to being involved in the Mirage nightclub killings of 7 people  and the grenade attack during the Tampico fair. Itzli found an article from Grupo published in 2012, saying 7 Zetas were arrested, among the 7 was another Z43;  Carlos Guízar Valencia alias "el Z-43" (also called El Charly), supposedly plaza boss of  Tabasco. This Z43 was charged with murder and other charges in 2012.  Whoever attended the meeting with 42, has substantial prominence in the Zetas cartel,.  Another article I found says Carlos Guizer at the time of his arrest was a drug coordinator with Colombia and several Mexican states.  It sounds like it may be him, but that also means he escaped, or...? The four cartels Each of the four organizations have different areas of specialization, for example; "Mencho" specializes in the manufacture of synthetic drugs, the Beltran and Carrillo are primarily involved, on  large scale, the importation and trafficking of cocaine, and Los Zetas, is a cartel that has  diversification, only 50% of their activities are drug related, the other 50% are criminal activities  such  extortion and kidnapping, oil theft, counterfeit merchandise, sex trade etc.  Mencho has allied his group with the new Templarios splinter group "Los Viagras" who have a strong presence in Michoacán, a state Mencho strongly aspires to control.  Los Viagras are manufacturing in  Michoacán much of the synthetic drug for Mencho. It would not be surprising to learn that La Familia Michoacana  would be a part of an alliance in some capacity since they are rumored to have a pact with CJNJ.  Allegedly the fracture of LFM leading to the formation of Caballeros Templarios, was due to a proposed Zetas alliance by leader Chango Mendez.  The Tuta group vehemently objected to.  Mendez was later arrested, he and Tuta are archenemies. At least two of the Sierra Santana brothers, are godsons of Chango Mendez.  The Sierra Santanas are founders and leaders of the "Los Viagras", first and only Templarios splinter group. Los Zetas and Beltran have a history of a close relationship, with  alliances,  or  non-aggression pacts with each other at since 2007.   In a  PGR investigation referenced as  UEIDCS / 241/2008, it is mentioned that in 2007,  Sergio Villarreal, alias "El Grande" Beltrán representative, and Heriberto Lazcano, "El Lazca" then leader of Los Zetas, agreed to joint actions.

O' Has no Strategy! ISIS has one for US, Europe, every non-Muslim !

Terrorists’ Handbook | National Review Online
http://www.drudgereport.com/

Maps to Help You Understand the World...Pass it on!

 

Maps to Help You Understand the World   1. This map shows the world divided into 7 sections (each with a distinct color) with each section containing 1 billion people.   2. This map shows (in white) where 98 percent of Australia's population lives.   3. It may not come as a surprise but more people live inside the circle than outside of it.   4. This map shows what is on the other side of the world from where you are standing.  For the most part it will probably be water.   5. Apparently you can't get Big Macs everywhere.  This map shows (in red) the countries that have McDonalds.   6. This map shows the countries (in blue) where people drive on the left side of the road.   7. This map shows countries (in white) that England has never invaded.  There are only 22 of them.   8. The line in this map shows all of the world's Internet connections in 1969.   9. This map shows the countries that heavily restricted Internet access in 2013.   10. This map shows (in red) countries that were all Communist at one point in time.   11. This map shows (in red) the countries that don't use the metric system.   12. This map shows (in blue) places where Google street view is available.   13. This map shows (in green) all the landlocked countries of the world.   14. And this is what the world would look like if all the countries with coast lines sank.   15. This is a map of the all the rivers in the United States.   16. And these are all the rivers that feed into the Mississippi River.   17. This is a map of the highest paid public employees in the United States.   18. This map shows how much space the United States would occupy on the moon.   19. This map shows the longest straight line you can sail.  It goes from Pakistan all the way to Kamchatka Peninsula in Russia for a total of 20,000 miles.   20. This is a map of 19th century shipping lanes that outlines the continents.   21. This map shows (in navy blue) every country that has ever operated an aircraft carrier.   22. This map highlights the countries (in red and orange) with the most skyscrapers.   23. This map shows (in red, orange, and yellow) the world's largest donors of foreign aid with red being the biggest donor.   24. This map shows the most photographed places in the world.   25. And this map shows all the places where you can get eaten by a Great White shark!

 

 

 

 

Audubon Florida Advocate Naturalist Magazine - Summer 2014!

Having trouble reading this email? Click here to read it online. Audubon Florida Advocate Naturalist Magazine - Summer 2014 Support the Audubon Team Tell Your Friends Send this message to your friends and family! Stay Connected Bookmark the Audubon Florida News Blog   Summer Edition of Audubon Florida Naturalist Magazine Now Available Download your (free!) copy of Audubon's popular conservation magazine right now - and share with your friends! Labor Day weekend marks the traditional end of summer and the start of fall.But this fall is different. We have a chance to do something that will completely shape the future of Florida conservation. Amendment 1 will direct $18 billion over twenty years to protect and restore water and land. We must do everything in our power to get 60% of the vote on November 4.  Nearly one million Florida voters signed the Water and Land Legacy petition to put Amendment 1 on the ballot. Audubon members gathered nearly 40,000 signatures and helped raise the budget to fund the campaign. To those who gathered signatures and contributed, please accept our hearty gratitude. You helped create an historic moment for Florida conservation. Florida’s conservation history is an epic tale of people who had the vision and passion to protect Florida’s special places through land conservation programs and projects. Please download the latest edition of Audubon Florida Naturalist to learn more about these places and the people who have enriched our state's remarkable natural heritage.  Don't forget, the 2014 Audubon Assembly will be held on October 17-18 and will help rally people to vote in favor of Amendment 1. We hope that you will join us – all Audubon members and supporters are welcome. We keep the costs low so you can learn and help shape Audubon’s conservation agenda.  Thank you. Sincerely, Audubon Florida P.S. For additional details on the Audubon Assembly, see pages 14-15 in theNaturalist Magazine. It's going to be a BIG YEAR for Florida's land, water, and wildlife!