Saturday, August 31, 2013

Top 5 Reasons Not to Use Missile Strikes in Syria


There are press reports that the White House is considering missile strikes on the Assad regime in Syria to punish it for the use of chemical weapons. That is a bad idea for five reasons.

1. The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine is not adequate justification for direct military intervention. This dangerous doctrine, promoted at the United Nations, undermines U.S. sovereignty by arguing for an obligation of nations to intervene. As Heritage’s legal expert on sovereignty matters, Steve Groves, explains:

a doctrine that compels the United States to act to prevent atrocities occurring in other countries would be risky and imprudent. U.S. independence—hard won by the Founders and successive generations of Americans—would be compromised if the United States consented to be legally bound by the R2P doctrine. The United States needs to preserve its national sovereignty by maintaining a monopoly on the decision to deploy diplomatic pressure, economic sanctions, political coercion, and especially its military forces.

2. A vital U.S. interest is not at stake. The U.S. does have an interest in the resolution of the conflict, but military force should be reserved for areas where the U.S. has a compelling need to act in defense of its own interests. There are other and more prudent options for advancing U.S. interests to help resolve the conflict.

3. It would not be a wise use of military force. Military force should be used only if there is a clear, achievable, realistic purpose. Missile strikes are unlikely to deter the Assad regime and prevent further abuses. Rather, the U.S. risks escalating its involvement in the crisis.

4. Missile attacks would only make President Obama look weaker. Much like President Clinton’s ineffective cruise missile strikes on Osama bin Laden’s terrorist camps, strikes would only be seen as a sign that the U.S. is lacking a clear, decisive course of action. The Middle East would see this as another effort from the Obama Administration to look for an “easy button” and lead from behind rather than exercise real, constructive leadership.

5. It would distract from what the U.S. should be doing. Rather than attempting to intervene directly in the conflict, the U.S. should be working in a concerted manner with other countries in the region to hasten the end of the Assad regime and deal with the refugee crisis, the resurgence of al-Qaeda, and the destabilizing efforts of Iran and Hezbollah.

Posted in Front PageProtect America [slideshow_deploy]

Comments (68)

-24
Scott's avatar

Scott

I disagree. I believe we should have used missile strikes early and often to disrupt government artillery strikes. We don't have to walk the ground to level the playing field. Missile strikes and no fly zones WERE effective in containing Sadaam Hussein in the late 90s. Sitting on the sideline watching anybody be massacred is not the moral high ground.
10 replies · active 4 hours ago
+64
disgusted's avatar

disgusted

I firmly beleave Obama and his illegal appointees should all be removed from office before it is too late.
5 replies · active 2 days ago
+44
toledofan's avatar

toledofan

Our foreign policy is an utter disaster and I fear the Democrats will try to do something, it'll be the wrong thing, to make Obama look like he's the man in charge, willing to do what is right. But at the end of the day, our window to help shut about a year ago and once Obama drew the imaginary line in the sand, he backed himself, again, into a corner. We should be allying with Israel, we should have done this 5 years ago, insuring that our allies are safe and know we will help them no questions asked, but, again, we didn't and another mistake is to try and make Obama the Commander in Chief he isn't.
+15
Bill Aken's avatar

Bill Aken

This could be the same kind of ruse for which Al-Quida and Hezabollah are famous for... Lets not start attacking another country until we have all the facts... What leader is stupid enough to use chemical weapons several days after he is warned not to.... just a wee bit to convenient....
2 replies · active 2 days ago
+26
Dan Schmutz's avatar

Dan Schmutz

Obama seems to feel like the United Nations is superior to our constitution. It is not and we should follow our own directive and not those put together by some friends and our enemies. THINK ABOUT IT?
+16
MARTHA TISH's avatar

MARTHA TISH

Ally with Israel, that is our only hope. God will take care of us if we do. Read the Bible (KJV 1611 VERSION)
-13
J. Kane's avatar

J. Kane

Congratulations Scott. Thank you for taking the moral high ground. 
It is interesting that there is no concern over the hundred thousand lives already lost in Syria. How many more lives will be taken by the weapons of mass destruction that remain. Perhaps we should see the suffering and death of those our children that have died. 
It is sad that most comments above support the selfish concerns of unaffected individuals . The American Spirit is truly a thing of the past.
2 replies · active 2 days ago
+31
jay w's avatar

jay w

Does anyone really trust our government when the Secretary of State says "we know for a fact that Assad's forces used chemical weapons? This administration has a credibility gap due its past lying
+13
Barbara Frances Delo's avatar

Barbara Frances Delo

It's terrible what is happening there...and an absolute human rights catastrophe... yet it is primarily a civil war... it is not our place to pick winners and losers for other countries??? All we can rightly do is express our support for those we believe in ...and work to protect our interests in the region...
1 reply · active 2 days ago
0
Barbara Frances Delo's avatar

Barbara Frances Delo

and another thought..what being done on the humanitarian front???
1 reply · active 2 days ago
+7
John Moody's avatar

John Moody

As with Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor, which brought us into WWII, the Syrian army and other Arab factions are looking to draw US into a war in Syria (neighbor to Iran); and with Egypt's near-civil war brewing, we would be foolish to be duped into yet another world war.
+13
Bobbi M's avatar

Bobbi M

Well well well, it seems that a HUGE majority of the American People want the US to stay the hell OUT of other countries and let them fight their OWN wars. HOORAH!!! Here are protests against missile strikes or yet ANOTHER ' NATION MAKING " move on another country !!! Enough of OUR boys have died or been maimed for life, MOST of them if you tally in the mental problems these wars have cost. Let them fight to the death if they want , and be STANDING BUY to make sure they do not try to make it OUR death, or let them settle their own differences.
+8
CIH's avatar

CIH

We need to stay out of conflicts in countries where the main fight is CIVIL WAR....
+8
William S.'s avatar

William S.

jay w..."Ditto" our transparent Presidential Administration has all too many credibility issues to-date. Furthermore, our intervention would fail to possess any achievements, except one, the Syrians (all of them)would hate the U.S. even more. We would most likely kill & injure many innocent people (those we hope to help) and piss off the ones that view we took the wrong side. Our intervention is a no win solution....period! Let us learn from Egypt, Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan....stay the hell out of "Nation Building". As a result, no "No Fly zones", cruise-missile and/or drone strikes. Let them work it out between themselves!!!!
+18
Brock's avatar

Brock

The U.S. government should protect the U.S. 
In what way is Assad a threat to the U.S.? 
In what way will intervention help the U.S. economy improve? 
How will intervention reduce unemployment in the U.S.? 
U.S. intervention will only distract from the refusal of most Americans to buy-in to ACA and allow the present administration to continue its effort to ignore the Constitution and dictate the future.
-13
Kirk B.'s avatar

Kirk B.

Although I agree with Steve Groves regarding the R2P Doctrine, we (USA) must be prepared to deal with leaders of other countries who use chemical weapons to kill their own people. We should act immediatly with our allies in the world and with our best effort to first investigate and then respond.I'm sure we have the best intellegence on the ground or we should have. And if it's true and they have used chemical weapons then we should take immediate action to remove that leader. We do not want any more Adolf Hitlers. But we should act within the framework of the US Constitution. This is urgent!
1 reply · active 2 days ago
+15
Terry-fix America1st's avatar

Terry-fix America1st

American Spirit a thing of the past? In many Americans it is dead! Our country is in serious need of leadership and moral teaching here at home! Sure I feel horrible about people slaughtering there own over there, yes it effects me! But don't we do the same in different ways? When children have absolutely no moral conscious, respect or 'American Spirit' at a level where they believe it's ok to beat a man to death because they're bored.... I believe it's long past time to refocus on our own. WWll veteran Delbert Belton, a senior citizen, a man of honor, a man who fought bravely and made sacrifices for his country, fought for the freedom of future generations only to have his life brutally taken by the youth of this generation effects me! That effects me deeply and I never met the man. How's that for moral high ground? I'm all for helping others but something is seriously wrong here. Let's get our own house in order before running out to help everyone else..... Again! This country always seems to be the leader in helping other countries both financially & in sacrificing the lives of our young people as we sink further into debt and grief. where has this gotten us? Our first order of business should be to elect a real Commander in Chief! The current one is clueless about the people in his own back yard. Disgusted by the in-humane treatment of human to human on this planet but we can't save the world if we can't save our own family...
1 reply · active 4 days ago
+4
Goushka's avatar

Goushka

Why is the Government and the Press SILENT with respect to what Russia may or may not do. Has our State Department contacted the Russian Foreign Ministry? Complete silence on this subject in the press/
+10
arby's avatar

arby

I think the Heritage author left out at least a sixth point. Russia has had a vested interest in Syria for decades. There are thousands of Russian citizens living in Syria now and there are Russian ships docked at a port there. 

Vladimir Putin is an old Cold Warrior who never abandoned his 'apparatchik' KGB mentality. If Obama, Kerry, the Senate, Congress all agree on a military strike or if Israel over-reacts to Syria, that could reactivate the Kremlin's old anti-West paranoid mentality, something that could lead to a nuclear war, not just a regional one. 

If that happens, that would be far worse than a chemical gas attack against Syrian civilians. Frankly I think most government "leaders" in America and in the world today at large are just a bunch of irrational, power mad freaks. Who says America must be the world's international cop? Reagan once said: "Governments start wars, not people." He was right. 

Beam me up Scotty....
1 reply · active 2 days ago
#6 There is no proof that Assad used chemical weapons. who would benefit from it's use? Muslims who are looking to the U.S. to knock out Assad so they can take over. 
Assad would be foolish to use weapons like that, especially as it is not his last resort.. This is a set up by Muslims and Obama. Don't fall for it.
2 replies · active 2 days ago

Top 5 Reasons Not To Use Missile Strikes In Syria...

Trackback from PA Pundits - International

By James Carafano Ph.D.~ Massed Protests In Syria There are press reports that the White House is considering missile strikes on the Assad regime in Syria to punish it for the use of chemical weapons. That is a bad idea for five reasons. 1. The Respons...
+13
Buck Russell's avatar

Buck Russell

No airstrikes or military action of any kind without proper congressional approval. Bush got approval, so should Obama. This is not an immenent threat to the US. 

Haven't we learned our lesson? Muslims don't want peace. Islam is a religion of war and dominance at any cost. 

You want to interven somewhere for humand dignity, lets start with North Korea. It is a black eye on humanity and all civilized nations that we sit back and do nothing to help those folks.
1 reply · active 2 days ago

No comments:

Post a Comment

Featured Post

RT @anti_commie32: Keep up the great work!!! https://t.co/FIAnl1hxwG

RT @anti_commie32: Keep up the great work!!! https://t.co/FIAnl1hxwG — Joseph Moran (@JMM7156) May 2, 2023 from Twitter https://twitter....