GLOBAL WARMING AND THE ECO-SOCIALISTS BARACK OBAMA AGREES TO CUT A DEAL WITH IRAN, SELLS OUT ISRAEL TO DISTRACT AMERICA FROM OBAMACARE FAILURE

One Citizen Speaking...

---

• GLOBAL WARMING AND THE ECO-SOCIALISTS
• BARACK OBAMA AGREES TO CUT A DEAL WITH IRAN, SELLS OUT ISRAEL TO DISTRACT AMERICA FROM OBAMACARE FAILURE
• THE PROGRESSIVE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: FOOL ME ONCE, FOOL ME TWICE, CONTINUE TO FOOL ME

GLOBAL WARMING AND THE ECO-SOCIALISTS Posted: 23 Nov 2013 05:08 PM PST There is little doubt in my mind that the radical socialists and communists have infiltrated the environmental movement, where an abundance of “useful idiots” contribute their time, effort, and money to pursue a socialist agenda and to use our laws against us. A fifth column designed by our enemies, both foreign and domestic, to use our own money and laws against us as they advance their toxic agenda. The socialists are all about gaining and maintaining political power through the creation and management of real or imagined scarcity. Very rarely do you hear that mankind is smart enough to use their brains and technology to grow their way out of potential disaster. No, it is all about population control and the need for affluent or industrialized nations to curtail their lifestyles and to reduce their standard of living – all for the purposes of fulfilling the socialist’s wealth redistribution promises to those “population units” whom they are encouraging to revolt and disrupt the system. Here is an example of how the socialists are trying to subvert American society … As you read this piece, consider that the socialist “scientists,” acting on behalf of the United Nations or their member states, have openly lied and distorted so-called scientific data  to gin up media attention and funding for their causes. In reality, the United Nations is a dismal fraud upon the world as they sat idly by and watched the genocide in Africa, appointed the worst human rights offenders to positions on their committees, and have killed hundreds of millions of people with their nonsense about DDT.  Consider the implications of a significant reduction of spending on our infrastructure and our economy. A road to ruin that is heartily encouraged by those who do not wish America well and want to weaken her defenses in order to promote the rise of another socialist/communist superpower to hold America “in check” and unable to spread democracy to totalitarian states. Note, this video is approximately 26 minutes long and filled with socialist/communist propaganda … I find it amazing that the socialist/communists are now calling for “clean” nuclear power after decades of protesting against anything nuclear – ostensibly to reduce our weapons-making capabilities and to keep us from true energy independence. Bear in mind that we now have solidly-engineered nuclear reactors, but politics (NIMBY – Not In My Back Yard) plays a role in site selection and the selection of contracts; many of whom have been known to cut corners in the past to increase profits and make up for their low-bids. It is also extremely funny that many of the activists protested the meeting saying “polluters talk, we walk” – perhaps in reference to the fact that carbon and pollution credits are little more than government-sanctioned “indulgences” that allow polluters to keep polluting their local air, water, and land while passing the costs on to their utility ratepayers, customers, and the public at large. All based on some theoretical calculation involving trees in a rain forest and a piece of paper created, sold, banked, and traded by the Wall Street Wizards and their wealthy friends. "We Have to Consume Less": Scientists Call For Radical Economic Overhaul to Avert Climate Crisis A pair of climate scientists are calling for what some may view as a shocking solution to the global warming crisis: a rethinking of the economic order in the United States and other industrialized nations. Kevin Anderson and Alice Bows-Larkin of the influential Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research in England say many of the solutions proposed by world leaders to prevent "runaway global warming" will not be enough to address the scale of the crisis. They have called for "radical and immediate de-growth strategies in the United States, EU and other wealthy nations." Anderson says that to avoid an increase in temperature of two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit), the world would require a "revolutionary change to the political and economic hegemony." Now that the United States has moved from an agrarian society, through the industrial revolution, to the age of technology and service industries, it should be noted that we thrive on consumerism. And, that without the continuing consumption of goods and services, money would accrete to the wealthy, our standard of living will nosedive, and we will be caught-up in a death spiral that promises to turn America into an unexceptional member nation of the United Nations, much like the socialist democracy of France. First, I have never heard of the influential Tyndall Centre nor the two scientists quoted. Second, the concept of “runaway global warming” is not a fact, not an observation of historical climate patterns, and is little more than a hypothesis based on deeply-flawed computer models with mistaken assumptions and highly-massaged input data. The fact is that global climate seems to change about 1.2o Celsius and that all of the climate patterns we are seeing are well within the range of normal and historical climate variability. Truth be told, the majority of the climate models failed to predict or illustrate the current decade+ of global cooling. But, the authors are dead-on correct about the “revolutionary” change and wealth redistribution that is being referenced by radical socialists and communists Third, it appears that Kevin and his colleagues are hanging with the eco-socialists and trying to bring about a revolution … “Socialist Bolivian President Evo Morales said delegates needed to fight a “battle between capitalism and life.” Without a strong agreement, global warming “will keep getting worse,” he warned. Some of his proposed solutions: a “Climate Tribunal” for “climate criminals,” implementation of his “Declaration of Rights” for “Mother Earth,” and, of course, lots of capitalist money transfers. His sentiments were echoed by representatives of tin-pot dictators around the world — most of whom love to blame the problems they have created in their own countries on global warming and “evil capitalist” countries. Morales’ counterpart in Venezuela, socialist strongman Hugo Chavez, blamed a downpour that washed away some shanty towns in his utopia on “capitalism,” too. Their supposed solution: world socialism.” “This, naturally, was music to the ears of the Socialist International (SI), the worldwide organization of socialist and communist parties, which plays an important role at all UN conferences. The Socialist International — which counted Obama’s “Climate Czar” Carol Browner among its leaders until she left SI to join the new U.S. administration — joined the call for committing at least $100 billion per year into a United Nations “Green Fund,” ostensibly to save the poor.” “A proposal by Professor Kevin Anderson, director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research in the U.K., made a splash at Cancun. Anderson authored a paper for the Royal Society urging the adoption of a draconian World War II-style rationing system — for carbon emissions. “The Second World War and the concept of rationing is something we need to seriously consider if we are to address the scale of the problem we face,” he explained in the article, urging world rulers to limit electricity and prohibit food imports, among other things. His suggestion would involve a total freeze on economic growth in developed countries and “carbon rations” for every person on the planet. Unbelievably, at least one of his “Royal Society” colleagues said even that would not be enough.”  <Source> Fourth, we continue to see well-credentialed, well-titled, and well-employed “scientists” bridge the gap between science and socialism. Some even going to far as to define socialism as the scientific management The philosophy of science basis of the claim of Marxism—and, in the Soviet Union, Marxism-Leninism—to be a science is based its conceptions of dialectical materialism and historical materialism. Although the influence of Marxist thought especially in the social sciences is great, there are no communities of theoretical or applied scientists or technicians based on Marxism. <Source> Fifth, as many have noted, the discipline of so-called “climate science” seems to include many individuals outside of the traditional disciplines of physics, chemistry, and mathematics. Many of the activists who are engaged in “doing climate science” appear to be geologists, engineers and others in the social sciences and economics who find that funding and recognition can be more easily obtained when one links and extrapolates their work to the “climate realm, rather than simply stating their findings and conclusions in scientific journals. A review of the participants of any of the socialist-dominated climate conferences is heavily weighted towards political functionaries. And sixth, it should be noted that, as with any radical political movement such as socialism and communism, those with a contrarian findings, conclusions or view points are demonized, disparaged, or denigrated with the goal of making them and their work irrelevant. Thus, many reputable and credible scientists have been forced into silence lest their reputation and employment suffer.  Look how “climate scientists” are subtly associated with truly accomplished scientists and how class warfare is woven into the mix … AMY GOODMAN: Yes, we’re broadcasting from the U.N. climate change summit here in Warsaw, Poland, the country of Copernicus and Marie Curie—the first metal she named, polonium, for Poland, and then, of course, radium. We turn now to a pair of climate scientists who are calling for what some may view as a shocking solution to the climate crisis: a rethinking of the economic order in the United States and other industrialized nations. Their names are Kevin Anderson and Alice Bows-Larkin. They work at the influential Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research in England, as well as the University of Manchester. They were featured in a recent widely read article by Naomi Klein headlined "How Science Is Telling Us All to Revolt." According to Anderson and Bows-Larkin, many of the solutions proposed by world leaders to prevent "runaway global warming" will not be enough to address the scale of the crisis. They have called for, "radical and immediate de-growth strategies in the U.S., EU and other wealthy nations." Anderson has said that to avoid an increase in temperature of two degrees Celsius—that’s 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit—the worldwould require a, quote, "revolutionary change to the political and economic hegemony." Kevin Anderson and Alice Bows-Larkin are here in Warsaw at the U.N. climate summit. We welcome you both to Democracy Now! It was rare to be able to actually sit across the table from you, because I know you don’t fly. You came here by train, Dr. Anderson. KEVIN ANDERSON: Yes, that’s the case. We haven’t flown for—I haven’t flown for eight years. And Alice is something similar, I think. ALICE BOWS-LARKIN: Yeah. AMY GOODMAN: Because? KEVIN ANDERSON: Because the carbon dioxide emissions from flying, I mean, it’s sort of emblematic of modern life, for the wealthy few of us, that it symbolizes what we do, day in, day out. We don’t think twice about burning more and more carbon. So it’s important for us to make—it’s a symbolic gesture. But then, hopefully, that catalyzes action with other people to also say, "We, too, can make those sorts of changes." Those who do not wish to watch the video and to read this false screed in context, it can be found at Democracy Now. Flying is no longer for the “wealthy” and modern communications has brought the various peoples of this world closer than ever before. Perhaps one reason why the socialists and communists want to control the discussion. How else are they going to explain to “their people” why their life in crapistan is horrible and others – even the poor – are thriving in the United States and elsewhere. To tell them the truth about their totalitarian kleptocracy would be to invite a revolution of the wrong kind, the kind that throws the corrupt enlightened ruling elite on the ash heap of history without significant wealth, position, and power to elevate their exalted being. Bottom line … As long as corruption exists in government, and human nature makes it a certainty, there is no equitable solution to the division of natural or manmade resources. The idea that the politicians can sell their public policies to the masses based on the fear of a planetary emergency is ludicrous in the light of simple facts: the Earth has been hotter and colder, with more atmospheric carbon dioxide and less atmospheric carbon dioxide, before man’s significant influence began in the industrial revolution. Man has always adapted to changing climates and circumstances by moving or improving their sheltering mechanisms and methodologies. Man cannot affect the energy output of the Sun, the position of the Earth relative to the Sun, nor the Earth’s rotational and processional dynamics.  Likewise, man cannot effect the Earth’s volcanology, plate tectonics, deep ocean currents. or the greatest greenhouse gas of all, water vapor. Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant, but a life-sustaining gas; and that an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide is beneficial for plants, oxygen production, and life in general. Likewise, the rise in carbon dioxide lags the rise in temperature, so carbon dioxide is not a causal factor in global climate change. Socialists and communists are all about revolution and the imposition of a totalitarian regime to control the people for the benefit of the ruling elite. With respect to climate science, I defer to Dick Feynman's observation, anything with science is the title (e.g. climate science, political science, etc.)  often has little or nothing to do with science as it is commonly understood. With respect to the climate and political scientists who are attempting to overthrow the United States government and transform America into a socialist state – STFU or go cure the poverty and pollution in China, Russia, and elsewhere using nothing but their natural resources for funding. With respect to the “dudes in dashikis” and the participants of those socialist-named coalitions, networks, partnerships, and bio-diversity organizations, you come with your hands out, but have little or nothing to say about the kleptocrats running the show in your neighborhood. Perhaps it is time you revolted instead of making others feel responsible for your starving children and lack of clean water, food, and medicine. Before you ask Americans to transform their country into crapistan, perhaps you should clean up crapistan and prove that your socialist/communist system actually works and that you enjoy human rights and other God-given freedoms. And, I leave you with a fundamental question, Why should I disadvantage myself, my family, my friends, my community, my state, or my nation to give a portion of my hard-earned money to other third-world nations where it is, more often than not, stolen by corrupt political kleptocrats. If anything, explain why we are focusing on Africa when our inner cities of Detroit, Chicago, Oakland and elsewhere are festering cesspools of poverty, illiteracy, disease, and despair – all governed by the progressive socialist democrats who are pushing this climate change nonsense? -- steve Related articles Climate Change: It Doesn't Matter Whether It Is Global Warming or Global Cooling As Long As There Are Socialist Public Policies to Be Implemented and Special Profits to Be Made! Global Warming: Can It Be That Man's Influence on Warming Is Not As Great As We Thought? Obama's Team of Alinsky's Radical Socialists: Demonize Those That Don't Believe in Global Warming -- What They Are Hiding From the Public? "We Have To Consume Less": Scientists Call For Radical Economic Overhaul to Avert Climate Crisis Warsaw's widening climate chasm could lead to 4C warming | Graham Readfearn Global Warming Nut Prof. Anderson 'Cuts back on washing and showering' to fight climate change Whacked out socialist environmentalists and animal rights whacko's are asking: "Would You Give Up Eating Hamburgers to Stop Climate Change?" Global warming professor Kevin Anderson 'cuts back on washing and showering' to fight climate change - Admits at UN climate summit: 'That is why I smell'

BARACK OBAMA AGREES TO CUT A DEAL WITH IRAN, SELLS OUT ISRAEL TO DISTRACT AMERICA FROM OBAMACARE FAILURE Posted: 23 Nov 2013 09:30 PM PST The only reason President Obama took to the airwaves Saturday night was to influence the Sunday news cycle and to ensure that the Administration’s chin-waggers talk about the great deal Obama cut with Iran INSTEAD OF THE CONTINUING ABYSMAL FAILURE OF OBAMACARE. However, for those who are watching closely, President Obama agreed to turn over BILLIONS of blocked dollars and reduce economy-crippling sanctions that were forcing Iran to moderate its nuclear program. Unfortunately, the real deal is that Iran will consider a reduction in their nuclear program – not cessation – when the U.S. check clears the bank. A promise not unlike the one Neville Chamberlin got from Adolph Hitler. Appeasement pure and simple … and all to distract the American public from the disaster that is Obamacare. Obviously, he cares little for the only productive democracy in the region … Reverend Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan would be so proud. For cutting a deal with Iran, the people who foment state-sponsored terrorism in the region, the people who endanger Israel and others in the region, and the people who supplied enhanced IED (Improvised Explosive Devices) that killed and maimed U.S. soldiers,  I hereby reward Barack Obama with his rightful place in history … This is a breaking story … more later. -- Steve Related articles OBAMA: Iran Nuclear Deal 'Cuts Off Most Likely Path To A Bomb' ["Most Likely" Not Sufficient For Israel] Obama declares Iran deal 'important first step' Obama declares Iran deal 'important first step' Obama declares Iran deal 'important first step'

THE PROGRESSIVE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: FOOL ME ONCE, FOOL ME TWICE, CONTINUE TO FOOL ME Posted: 22 Nov 2013 10:30 PM PST Many bloggers are independent pundits are beginning to comment on the renewed vigor with which the progressive mainstream media appears to be attacking the President of the United States and his Administration. And, unlike the rather inarticulate former President George Bush, I remember the pertinent quote: "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me" What we now know … The White House and its administrative agencies are now beginning to bypass the progressive mainstream media in favor of producing or stage-managing their own media events. Using government employees to produce propaganda favorable to the President and his Administration. These pre-produced media products are then offered to the progressive mainstream media – with many outlets taking and presenting this propaganda sandwiched between their own commentary as if it was part of their production process. A great time and cost-savings benefit for the smaller outlets, but not exactly the role of an independent media that is being denied increasing access to the President, White House, and Administrative agency events. The President is not running for office and appears to care little for the people he purports to govern. President Obama has repeatedly been caught lying – and there is no other term – to the American people on a number of important and serious issues: the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the Benghazi 9/11 terror attack and the alleged conveyance of military-grade weaponry to militant fundamental Islamic radicals (AKA terrorists), the subversion of a presidential election using the IRS to deny fundraising opportunities to the opposition, the NSA spying on American soil, the Fast and Furious provision of weapons to Mexican drug cartels, and more yet to be discovered. The President doesn’t appear to care if he is attacked personally and is all about providing his cadre of progressive socialist democrats in Congress with cover from the fallout for the President’s lying, the pain and suffering inflicted on millions of Americans who thought Obamacare was going to provide them with better medical care and insurance at a lower cost, and all of the other scandals swirling about. So why should we trust the progressive mainstream media? It appears that the renewed vigor of the progressive mainstream media is a sham. Having overwhelmingly supported Barack Obama and progressive socialists democrats, they need to regain America’s trust as an independent arbiter – so they can feed the American public the same line of progressive bullshit when Hillary Clinton announced her presidential aspiration. All of the coverage given to conservatives and conservatism will evaporate in a flash on the day Hillary Clinton announces her candidacy. And, the vicious, personal attacks on the conservatives will be ramped up to record levels as they declare that the GOP is engaging in a “War on Women” and pointing out that the GOP hates Hispanics, children, clean water and clean air. Bottom line … In essence, the progressive mainstream media is trying desperately to make themselves relevant and credible again – so, once again,  they can stab conservatives in the back. The Leopard does not change its spots – and certainly not in a span of 12 months. So I say to my fellow Americans …. "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me" -- steve